Hurl
Hurl: A focused open-source CLI for plain-text API tests and CI/CD execution. Ranked #16 of 33 in API Testing Tools by our editors (7.6/10); pricing: Free plan; best for CLI-first teams testing HTTP APIs in CI.
At a glance
- Editor score7.6 / 10
- PricingFree plan
- Best forCLI-first teams testing HTTP APIs in CI
- Free planYes
- Paid fromFree
- Facts checked21 Sep 2026
Where it wins
- Plain-text tests support chaining, captures, and detailed assertions
- Covers REST, SOAP, GraphQL, XPath, and JSONPath validation
- Produces text, JUnit, TAP, and HTML reports for CI workflows
Where it doesn't
- CLI-first workflows may not suit teams seeking a graphical interface
- Does not include mocks or contract testing in its stated feature set
- Scheduled test runs are not part of its stated feature set
Our verdict on Hurl
Hurl is an open-source command-line tool for developers and DevOps teams who define HTTP tests in plain-text files. It runs requests, chains multiple calls, captures response values for later use, and validates status codes, headers, HTML, JSON, and XML. Support for REST, SOAP, and GraphQL makes it suitable for teams testing varied API styles, while Linux, macOS, and Windows support broadens its local development fit. The single Rust binary and libcurl foundation also keep its distribution focused for command-line environments.
The main strength is the depth of its request-and-assertion workflow. Hurl can query responses with XPath and JSONPath, test endpoint performance and response bytes, and generate text, JUnit, TAP, and HTML reports. Those formats give CI pipelines several ways to consume results, and the published integrations include GitHub Actions and GitLab CI/CD. Teams that prefer version-controlled, readable test files can keep request definitions and assertions alongside application code.
Hurl’s pricing model is open source, and it is distributed under the Apache License 2.0. Its fit is strongest when API testing belongs in local terminals and CI/CD pipelines rather than in a graphical test workspace. Teams needing plain-text HTTP coverage across REST, SOAP, or GraphQL should consider it; teams that require mocks, contract testing, or scheduled runs should choose a product that explicitly includes those workflows.
Your product? Our editors can test Hurl in depth and publish a review, labelled as paid · from $149/mo →
Hurl pricing
Hurl fact sheet
| Free plan | Yes |
|---|---|
| Paid from | Free |
| GraphQL support | Yes |
| SOAP support | Yes |
| Scheduled runs | Not verified |
| CI/CD integration | Yes |
| Mock server | Not verified |
| Contract testing | Not verified |
| Included requests | Not verified |
| Deployment | Self-hosted |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Support | Docs, Community |
| Built for | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise (editorial estimate) |
| Pricing | Free plan |
| Website | hurl.dev |
| Facts checked | 21 Sep 2026 |
Alternatives to Hurl
- PostmanA mature API test platform with broad protocol support and a wide feature set.9.3
- ApidogA broad API toolkit for teams that need design, testing, automation, and documentation together.9.2
- SoapUIA broad, free API testing desktop tool for functional, contract, performance, and load work.9.0
Also Ranked In
Hurl is ranked in 3 of our directories.
Used Hurl? Be the first to review it
The editor score above is our own research. What this page doesn't have yet is a reader's view — what you used Hurl for, what worked and what didn't. No stars are seeded and no review is paid for; an editor reads every one before it appears.
Write a reviewTwo minutes · verified accounts only · read by an editor before it appears
Featured on iTechGuides
Hurl is listed in our API Testing Tools directory. Add the badge to your site — it links back to this page.
<a href="https://www.itechguides.com/products/hurl/"><img src="https://www.itechguides.com/best/badge/hurl.svg" alt="Featured on iTechGuides" width="230" height="46"></a>
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Last updated · How we research and update