Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Hound review

Freemium#48 of 51 in Code Review Software

A focused GitHub lint reviewer for teams that want configurable style checks.

5.5/10Editor score
Hound5.5 Visit Hound

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Hound is a hosted code review service for teams working with GitHub pull requests. It uses supported linters to check changed code for style and quality issues, then adds findings as inline comments in the pull request. Its language coverage includes JavaScript, Ruby, Python, Swift, PHP, Sass, Go, Elixir, TypeScript, CoffeeScript, Haml, and Shell. Repository-level configuration through .hound.yml lets teams adjust style-guide behavior. Hound fits development teams that want automated lint feedback inside a GitHub-centered review workflow.

Pricing is based on private-review volume rather than per-user access. Public repositories are free. The Chihuahua plan costs $29 per month for up to 50 private reviews, while Terrier costs $49 per month for up to 300 private reviews. Labrador costs $99 per month for up to 1,000 private reviews, and Husky costs $199 per month for up to 3,000 private reviews. These tiers give small teams a low-entry paid option and provide higher review allowances as private-repository activity grows.

Hound’s main strength is focus: it automates linter-based style and quality checks, supports configurable rules, and comments directly on GitHub pull requests when they are opened or updated. That makes it a practical choice for teams prioritizing consistent code style across several supported languages. It is less suited to organizations seeking AI-assisted review, security analysis, review analytics, or code-host coverage beyond GitHub. Teams needing those capabilities should consider a broader code review product, while GitHub teams looking for configurable lint feedback can choose Hound for its narrow, workflow-oriented approach.

Hound pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Automates reviews when GitHub pull requests open or change
    • Adds inline comments for code quality and style issues
    • Supports multiple languages with configurable style guides
  • Where it doesn't
    • Works with GitHub as its listed code host
    • Does not provide AI review or security analysis
    • Advanced private-review volumes require higher monthly plans

Hound fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update