Best Google Cloud Managed Lustre Alternatives in 2026
The top Google Cloud Managed Lustre alternatives are Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP, Alibaba Cloud File Storage NAS and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP: 15 cloud file storage services our editors would look at instead of Google Cloud Managed Lustre, in our ranking order.
Google Cloud Managed Lustre: High-throughput POSIX storage with performance tiers for Google Cloud workloads. Where it falls short: no free plan; pricing is billed monthly per GiB.
Switching from Google Cloud Managed Lustre? For most cloud file storage services buyers the best Google Cloud Managed Lustre alternative is Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP, built for aWS multiprotocol enterprise storage. On a budget, Amazon FSx for OpenZFS starts at $0.09/mo. Alibaba Cloud Cloud Parallel File System (CPFS) offers the most maximum capacity (1024 TB).
Why People Look for a Google Cloud Managed Lustre Alternative
- No free plan; pricing is billed monthly per GiB
- Instances are provisioned in individual zones
- Scaling uses provisioned capacity and supports Lustre over TCP
- No managed backups — 15 of the alternatives below have it
Quick Picks by What You Need
- Best overallAmazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP9.4
AWS multiprotocol enterprise storage
Visit Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP - Lowest priceAmazon FSx for OpenZFS8.7
Paid plans from $0.09/mo
Visit Amazon FSx for OpenZFS - Most maximum capacityAlibaba Cloud Cloud Parallel File System (CPFS)8.1
1024 TB
Visit Alibaba Cloud Cloud Parallel File System (CPFS) - Best for managed backupsAmazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP9.4
Managed backups (Google Cloud Managed Lustre: no)
Visit Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP
All 15 Google Cloud Managed Lustre Alternatives, Ranked
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
-
Best forAWS multiprotocol enterprise storage
- Better than Google Cloud Managed Lustre:
- Managed backups
- Editor score 9.4 vs 7.3
A broad AWS storage service for enterprise file and block workloads.
- Snapshots
- Managed backups
9.4/10★★★★★Visit AWS -
Best forBroad Alibaba Cloud file storage needs
- Better than Google Cloud Managed Lustre:
- Managed backups
- Editor score 9.3 vs 7.3
Flexible NFS and SMB file storage for Alibaba Cloud workloads, with usage-based tiers.
- Snapshots
- Managed backups
9.3/10★★★★★Visit Alibaba Cloud -
Best forMulticloud enterprise file and block storage
- Better than Google Cloud Managed Lustre:
- Managed backups
- Editor score 9.2 vs 7.3
A broad ONTAP storage appliance for enterprise workloads across AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud.
- Snapshots
- Managed backups
9.2/10★★★★★Visit NetApp -
Best forAzure enterprise file volumes
- Better than Google Cloud Managed Lustre:
- Managed backups
- Editor score 9.1 vs 7.3
A configurable Azure file service for enterprise workloads needing shared file access.
- Snapshots
- Managed backups
9.1/10★★★★★Visit site -
Best forGoogle Cloud multiprotocol volumes
- Better than Google Cloud Managed Lustre:
- Managed backups
- Editor score 9.0 vs 7.3
A flexible Google Cloud service for enterprise file, block, and application storage.
- Snapshots
- Managed backups
9.0/10★★★★☆Visit Google Cloud -
Best forElastic AWS-native file storage
- Better than Google Cloud Managed Lustre:
- Managed backups
- Editor score 8.9 vs 7.3
Elastic NFS file storage for Linux workloads running across AWS services.
- Managed backups
8.9/10★★★★☆Visit Amazon EFS -
Best forLow-cost Windows-compatible file shares
- Better than Google Cloud Managed Lustre:
- Managed backups
- Editor score 8.8 vs 7.3
A low-cost AWS file share for Windows workloads that need SMB and Active Directory.
- Snapshots
- Managed backups
8.8/10★★★★☆Visit Amazon FSx -
Best forLow-cost AWS NFS storage
- Better than Google Cloud Managed Lustre:
- Managed backups
- Editor score 8.7 vs 7.3
A cost-focused AWS NFS service with snapshots, backups, and flexible deployment options.
- Snapshots
- Managed backups
8.7/10★★★★☆Visit Amazon FSx -
Best forAffordable shared file storage
- Better than Google Cloud Managed Lustre:
- Managed backups
- Editor score 8.6 vs 7.3
Affordable shared storage with flexible access, scaling, snapshots, and Tencent integrations.
- Snapshots
- Managed backups
8.6/10★★★★☆Visit Tencent Cloud -
Best forIBM VPC file shares with replication
- Better than Google Cloud Managed Lustre:
- Managed backups
- Editor score 8.5 vs 7.3
A managed NFSv4.1 file service for IBM Cloud VPC workloads needing shared storage.
- Snapshots
- Managed backups
8.5/10★★★★☆Visit IBM Cloud -
Best forHuawei elastic NFS and SMB storage
- Better than Google Cloud Managed Lustre:
- Managed backups
- Editor score 8.4 vs 7.3
A focused Huawei Cloud file service for elastic shared storage across cloud servers.
- Managed backups
8.4/10★★★★☆Visit Huawei Cloud -
Best forElastic Huawei hybrid file access
- Better than Google Cloud Managed Lustre:
- Managed backups
- Editor score 8.3 vs 7.3
A flexible Huawei Cloud file service for shared NFS and SMB workloads.
- Managed backups
8.3/10★★★★☆Visit Huawei Cloud -
Best forManaged NFS on Google Cloud
- Better than Google Cloud Managed Lustre:
- Managed backups
- Editor score 8.2 vs 7.3
A managed NFS service for shared storage across Google Cloud workloads.
- Managed backups
8.2/10★★★★☆Visit Google Cloud -
Best forAlibaba high-throughput parallel storage
- Better than Google Cloud Managed Lustre:
- Managed backups
- Editor score 8.1 vs 7.3
A specialized parallel file system for Linux-based HPC and intelligent-computing workloads.
- Managed backups
8.1/10★★★★☆Visit Alibaba Cloud -
Best forScalable file and object platforms
- Better than Google Cloud Managed Lustre:
- Managed backups
- Editor score 8.0 vs 7.3
A scalable enterprise platform for file, object, block, and table data across protocols.
- Snapshots
- Managed backups
8.0/10★★★★☆Visit VAST Data
Google Cloud Managed Lustre Alternatives: Common Questions
What is the best alternative to Google Cloud Managed Lustre?
Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP: #1 in our Cloud File Storage Services ranking, with an editor score of 9.4 out of 10. A broad AWS storage service for enterprise file and block workloads.
Why do people look for Google Cloud Managed Lustre alternatives?
No free plan; pricing is billed monthly per GiB; Instances are provisioned in individual zones; Scaling uses provisioned capacity and supports Lustre over TCP.
Which Google Cloud Managed Lustre alternative has the most maximum capacity?
Alibaba Cloud Cloud Parallel File System (CPFS), with 1024 TB.
How do I switch from Google Cloud Managed Lustre?
Snapshot or back up the data and configs on your Google Cloud Managed Lustre server. Create the new server with the same operating system and size, and add your SSH key. Copy the data across (rsync or your backup tool) and reinstall your apps or containers. Move the DNS records or IP references to the new server, test it, then cancel Google Cloud Managed Lustre.
How to Switch from Google Cloud Managed Lustre
- Snapshot or back up the data and configs on your Google Cloud Managed Lustre server.
- Create the new server with the same operating system and size, and add your SSH key.
- Copy the data across (rsync or your backup tool) and reinstall your apps or containers.
- Move the DNS records or IP references to the new server, test it, then cancel Google Cloud Managed Lustre.
Google Cloud Managed Lustre vs Each Alternative
| # | Tool | Free plan | Paid from | Supported protocols | Snapshots | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 | Google Cloud Managed Lustre | No | $0.06/GB/mo | Lustre over TCP | 7.3 | |
| 1 | Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP | NFS, SMB, iSCSI, NVMe-over-TCP | Yes | 9.4 | ||
| 2 | Alibaba Cloud File Storage NAS | No | NFSv3, NFSv4.0, SMB 2.1, SMB 3.0 | Yes | 9.3 | |
| 3 | NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP | No | iSCSI, NFS, SMB, NVMe-TCP, S3 | Yes | 9.2 | |
| 4 | Azure NetApp Files | No | NFS, SMB, dual protocol, Object REST API | Yes | 9.1 | |
| 5 | Google Cloud NetApp Volumes | NFSv3, NFSv4.1, NFSv4.2, SMB, iSCSI, NVMe/TCP, S3 multiprotocol (ONTAP-mode only) | Yes | 9.0 | ||
| 6 | Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) | No | $0.30/GB/mo | NFSv4.0, NFSv4.1 | 8.9 | |
| 7 | Amazon FSx for Windows File Server | No | $0.01/GB/mo | SMB | Yes | 8.8 |
| 8 | Amazon FSx for OpenZFS | $0.09/mo | NFS v3, v4.0, v4.1, v4.2 | Yes | 8.7 | |
| 9 | Tencent Cloud File Storage (CFS) | $0.06/GB/mo | NFS, CIFS/SMB, TURBO | Yes | 8.6 | |
| 10 | IBM Cloud File Storage | NFSv4.1 | Yes | 8.5 | ||
| 11 | Huawei Cloud Scalable File Service Turbo | No | NFSv3, SMB 2.0, SMB 2.1, SMB 3.0 | 8.4 | ||
| 12 | Huawei Cloud Scalable File Service Turbo (SFS Turbo) | NFSv3, SMB 2.0, SMB 2.1, SMB 3.0 | 8.3 | |||
| 13 | Google Cloud Filestore | No | NFSv3, NFSv4.1 | No | 8.2 | |
| 14 | Alibaba Cloud Cloud Parallel File System (CPFS) | No | $0.12/GB/mo | POSIX, NFS v3 | 8.1 | |
| 15 | VAST Data Platform | NFS, SMB, S3, Block | Yes | 8.0 |
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update