Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Gerrit Code Review review

A configurable self-hosted review system for organizations building their own workflow.

7.6/10Editor score
Gerrit Code Review7.6 Visit Gerrit

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Gerrit Code Review is a web-based platform for reviewing and managing changes in Git repositories. It is designed for organizations that want to run code review on their own infrastructure and define their own approval, permission, and submission processes. Patchset-based workflows support iterative revisions, while inline comments keep discussion tied to specific changes. Custom dashboards help teams query and organize review activity.

Gerrit’s main strength is workflow control. Teams can configure submit requirements, approval rules, repository permissions, and project access at a fine-grained level. Its REST API, webhooks, command-line tools, and plugin system provide several ways to connect review with existing development processes. Listed integrations include GitHub, Jenkins, GitHub Actions, Zuul, and CI/CD systems. This makes Gerrit a strong fit when review needs to align closely with automated quality checks and internal engineering rules.

The trade-off is operational ownership. Gerrit is open-source and self-hosted rather than a hosted subscription product, so organizations choosing it take responsibility for running the platform. AI-assisted review and review analytics are available through listed plugins, not as core functionality, which adds an extension decision to those use cases. Choose Gerrit if your organization values customizable review gates, permissions, APIs, and infrastructure control. A hosted service may suit teams that want less platform administration or a simpler path to adoption.

Gerrit Code Review pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Patchset workflows support iterative reviews with inline comments
    • Fine-grained permissions and configurable approval rules
    • APIs, plugins, dashboards, and CI/CD integrations support customization
  • Where it doesn't
    • Requires teams to run and maintain the self-hosted platform
    • AI review and analytics depend on plugins rather than core features
    • Its workflow may be more involved than a hosted review service

Gerrit Code Review fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update