Best Find Security Bugs Alternatives in 2026
The top Find Security Bugs alternatives are Checkmarx SAST, Snyk Code and OpenText Fortify SAST: 15 static application security testing sast our editors would look at instead of Find Security Bugs, in our ranking order.
Find Security Bugs: An open-source JVM security plugin that adds framework-aware checks to SpotBugs workflows. Where it falls short: requires a SpotBugs-based workflow rather than operating as a standalone scanner.
Switching from Find Security Bugs? For most static application security testing sast buyers the best Find Security Bugs alternative is Checkmarx SAST, built for enterprise teams needing broad SAST coverage. On a budget, Snyk Code starts at $25/user/mo. Snyk Code has a free plan. Semgrep Code offers the most languages supported (35 languages).
Why People Look for a Find Security Bugs Alternative
- Requires a SpotBugs-based workflow rather than operating as a standalone scanner
- Custom rules are not listed as supported
- Support is through community resources and documentation
- No custom rules — 9 of the alternatives below have it
- Languages supported: 4 languages — up to 35 languages with Semgrep Code
Quick Picks by What You Need
- Best overallCheckmarx SAST9.3
Enterprise teams needing broad SAST coverage
Visit Checkmarx SAST - Lowest priceSnyk Code9.1
Paid plans from $25/user/mo
Visit Snyk Code - Best free optionSnyk Code9.1
Has a free plan
Visit Snyk Code - Most languages supportedSemgrep Code8.5
35 languages
Visit Semgrep Code - Best for custom rulesSnyk Code9.1
Custom rules (Find Security Bugs: no)
Visit Snyk Code
All 15 Find Security Bugs Alternatives, Ranked
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
-
Best forEnterprise teams needing broad SAST coverage
- Better than Find Security Bugs:
- Editor score 9.3 vs 6.9
Broad source analysis with custom queries and remediation guidance for enterprise teams.
9.3/10★★★★★Visit Checkmarx -
Best forTeams seeking SAST with a free entry tier
- Better than Find Security Bugs:
- Custom rules
- Languages supported: 16 languages vs 4 languages
- Editor score 9.1 vs 6.9
Source-code scanning across IDEs, pull requests and CI/CD, with a free entry tier.
- Custom rules
- CI/CD integration
9.1/10★★★★★Visit Snyk Code -
Best forLarge development and AppSec teams
- Better than Find Security Bugs:
- Custom rules
- Editor score 8.9 vs 6.9
Broad SAST coverage with pull-request scans, custom rules, and AI-assisted fixes.
- Custom rules
- CI/CD integration
8.9/10★★★★☆Visit OpenText -
Best forTeams needing deep multi-language and binary analysis
- Better than Find Security Bugs:
- Custom rules
- Editor score 8.8 vs 6.9
Whole-program code and binary analysis for teams with complex, high-integrity software.
- Custom rules
- CI/CD integration
8.8/10★★★★☆Visit AdaCore -
Best forMid-market and enterprise code-quality programs
- Better than Find Security Bugs:
- Custom rules
- Editor score 8.7 vs 6.9
Configurable SAST for teams that need code-quality gates across complex codebases.
- Custom rules
- CI/CD integration
8.7/10★★★★☆Contact Perforce -
Best forGitHub-centered teams wanting semantic scanning
- Better than Find Security Bugs:
- Custom rules
- Languages supported: 11 languages vs 4 languages
- Editor score 8.6 vs 6.9
Semantic SAST with custom queries and pull-request alerts, tied to GitHub Code Security for paid use.
- Custom rules
- CI/CD integration
8.6/10★★★★☆Visit GitHub CodeQL -
Best forTeams wanting customizable SAST and AI fixes
- Better than Find Security Bugs:
- Custom rules
- Languages supported: 35 languages vs 4 languages
- Editor score 8.5 vs 6.9
Custom rules, cross-file analysis, and AI fix guidance for code security workflows.
- Custom rules
- CI/CD integration
8.5/10★★★★☆Visit Semgrep -
Best forEnterprises scanning source, bytecode, and binaries
- Better than Find Security Bugs:
- Custom rules
- Editor score 8.4 vs 6.9
Scans source, bytecode, and binaries with policy controls and IDE/CI integrations.
- Custom rules
- CI/CD integration
8.4/10★★★★☆Visit Veracode -
Best forEnterprises needing broad language and framework coverage
- Better than Find Security Bugs:
- Editor score 8.3 vs 6.9
Broad source-code analysis for enterprises with complex application estates.
8.3/10★★★★☆Visit Black Duck -
Best forTeams wanting contextual prioritization and AI fixes
- Better than Find Security Bugs:
- Editor score 8.2 vs 6.9
Mend SAST pairs source-code scanning with prioritization and AI fix suggestions.
8.2/10★★★★☆Visit Mend -
Best forTeams wanting open-source multi-risk code scanning
- Better than Find Security Bugs:
- Custom rules
- Editor score 8.1 vs 6.9
Bearer scans source code for vulnerabilities, sensitive data flows, and privacy risks.
- Custom rules
- CI/CD integration
8.1/10★★★★☆Visit Bearer -
Best forPython teams wanting a free focused scanner
- Better than Find Security Bugs:
- Custom rules
- Editor score 8.0 vs 6.9
A free, focused Python scanner with configurable checks and CI workflows.
- Custom rules
- CI/CD integration
8.0/10★★★★☆Visit Bandit -
Best forMobile teams needing free source and binary analysis
- Better than Find Security Bugs:
- Editor score 7.9 vs 6.9
A free, mobile-focused tool for static and dynamic app security analysis.
- CI/CD integration
7.9/10★★★★☆Visit MobSF -
Best forGo teams wanting free taint-aware scanning
- Better than Find Security Bugs:
- Editor score 7.8 vs 6.9
A focused, free Go scanner with taint analysis and CI integrations.
- CI/CD integration
7.8/10★★★★☆Visit gosec -
Best forC/C++ teams wanting free pattern scanning
- Better than Find Security Bugs:
- Editor score 7.7 vs 6.9
A free, local C/C++ scanner for teams that want ranked vulnerability-pattern findings.
- CI/CD integration
7.7/10★★★★☆Visit Flawfinder
Find Security Bugs Alternatives: Common Questions
What is the best alternative to Find Security Bugs?
Checkmarx SAST: #1 in our Static Application Security Testing Sast ranking, with an editor score of 9.3 out of 10. Broad source analysis with custom queries and remediation guidance for enterprise teams.
Is there a free alternative to Find Security Bugs?
Yes. Snyk Code, GitHub CodeQL, Semgrep Code, Bearer and Bandit have a free plan or a free tier (8 of the 15 alternatives on this page).
What is the cheapest paid alternative to Find Security Bugs?
Of the alternatives here that publish a price, Snyk Code starts lowest, at $25/user/mo.
Why do people look for Find Security Bugs alternatives?
Requires a SpotBugs-based workflow rather than operating as a standalone scanner; Custom rules are not listed as supported; Support is through community resources and documentation.
Which Find Security Bugs alternative has the most languages supported?
Semgrep Code, with 35 languages.
How do I switch from Find Security Bugs?
Export your data from Find Security Bugs (most tools have an export in their settings). Sign up for the alternative; start on its free plan or trial if it has one. Import your export and set up the integrations your team relies on. Run both side by side for a short while, then cancel Find Security Bugs.
How to Switch from Find Security Bugs
- Export your data from Find Security Bugs (most tools have an export in their settings).
- Sign up for the alternative; start on its free plan or trial if it has one.
- Import your export and set up the integrations your team relies on.
- Run both side by side for a short while, then cancel Find Security Bugs.
Find Security Bugs vs Each Alternative
| # | Tool | Free plan | Paid from | CI/CD integration | Custom rules | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 | Find Security Bugs | Yes | Free | Yes | No | 6.9 |
| 1 | Checkmarx SAST | 9.3 | ||||
| 2 | Snyk Code | Yes | $25/user/mo | Yes | Yes | 9.1 |
| 3 | OpenText Fortify SAST | Yes | Yes | 8.9 | ||
| 4 | CodeSonar | Yes | Yes | 8.8 | ||
| 5 | Klocwork | Yes | Yes | 8.7 | ||
| 6 | GitHub CodeQL | Yes | $30/user/mo | Yes | Yes | 8.6 |
| 7 | Semgrep Code | Yes | $30/user/mo | Yes | Yes | 8.5 |
| 8 | Veracode Static Analysis | Yes | Yes | 8.4 | ||
| 9 | Black Duck Coverity | 8.3 | ||||
| 10 | Mend SAST | $1,000/user/yr | 8.2 | |||
| 11 | Bearer | Yes | Free | Yes | Yes | 8.1 |
| 12 | Bandit | Yes | Free | Yes | Yes | 8.0 |
| 13 | MobSF | Yes | Free | Yes | 7.9 | |
| 14 | gosec | Yes | Free | Yes | 7.8 | |
| 15 | Flawfinder | Yes | Free | Yes | 7.7 |
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update