Best Disaster Recovery Linux Manager Alternatives in 2026
The top Disaster Recovery Linux Manager alternatives are Azure Site Recovery, Veeam Recovery Orchestrator and VMware Live Site Recovery: 15 disaster recovery software our editors would look at instead of Disaster Recovery Linux Manager, in our ranking order.
Disaster Recovery Linux Manager: A free Linux recovery manager with strong backup coverage but limited failover orchestration. Where it falls short: does not provide verified failover orchestration.
Switching from Disaster Recovery Linux Manager? For most disaster recovery software buyers the best Disaster Recovery Linux Manager alternative is Azure Site Recovery, built for azure- and hybrid-environment enterprises. Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes has a free plan.
Why People Look for a Disaster Recovery Linux Manager Alternative
- Does not provide verified failover orchestration
- Does not include test failover capabilities
- Focused on GNU/Linux systems rather than broader platform coverage
Quick Picks by What You Need
- Best overallAzure Site Recovery9.4
Azure- and hybrid-environment enterprises
Visit Azure Site Recovery - Best free optionVeeam Kasten for Kubernetes8.2
Has a free plan
Visit Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes - Most rpo targetAzure Site Recovery9.4
0.5 min
Visit Azure Site Recovery
All 15 Disaster Recovery Linux Manager Alternatives, Ranked
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
-
Best forAzure- and hybrid-environment enterprises
- Better than Disaster Recovery Linux Manager:
- Editor score 9.4 vs 6.6
Broad hybrid workload coverage with orchestration, testing, and a 31-day trial.
- Failback orchestration
- Recovery runbooks
- Failover orchestration
9.4/10★★★★★Visit site -
Best forVeeam environments needing tested recovery plans
- Better than Disaster Recovery Linux Manager:
- Editor score 9.3 vs 6.6
A Veeam-centered platform for orchestrated, tested failover and recovery operations.
- Failback orchestration
- Recovery runbooks
- Failover orchestration
9.3/10★★★★★Visit Veeam -
Best forVMware environments requiring site recovery
- Better than Disaster Recovery Linux Manager:
- Editor score 9.2 vs 6.6
A focused choice for orchestrating recovery across paired VMware sites.
- Failback orchestration
- Recovery runbooks
- Failover orchestration
9.2/10★★★★★Contact VMware -
Best forAWS-centric teams with transparent hourly pricing
- Better than Disaster Recovery Linux Manager:
- Editor score 9.0 vs 6.6
A focused AWS recovery service with clear hourly pricing and separate traffic management.
- Failback orchestration
- Recovery runbooks
- Test failover
9.0/10★★★★☆Visit AWS DRS -
Best forBusinesses needing broad cloud DR orchestration
- Better than Disaster Recovery Linux Manager:
- Editor score 9.0 vs 6.6
Broad cloud DR orchestration for service providers managing mixed infrastructure.
- Failback orchestration
- Recovery runbooks
- Failover orchestration
9.0/10★★★★☆Visit Acronis -
Best forMulti-cloud teams needing near-synchronous recovery
- Better than Disaster Recovery Linux Manager:
- Editor score 8.9 vs 6.6
A capable multi-cloud recovery platform for teams that need near-synchronous protection.
8.9/10★★★★☆Visit Zerto -
Best forMixed Windows and Linux high availability
- Better than Disaster Recovery Linux Manager:
- Editor score 8.8 vs 6.6
A broad disaster recovery platform for mixed Windows and Linux high-availability workloads.
- Failback orchestration
- Failover orchestration
- Test failover
Pricing on request · 30-day trial Our Arcserve Replication and High Availability verdict → Visit Arcserve8.8/10★★★★☆Visit Arcserve -
Best forMSPs managing multi-tenant backup DR
- Better than Disaster Recovery Linux Manager:
- Editor score 8.7 vs 6.6
A hybrid DR platform with five-minute backups, virtualization, failback, and multi-tenant management.
- Failback orchestration
- Failover orchestration
- Test failover
8.7/10★★★★☆Visit Datto SIRIS -
Best forSMBs wanting guided hybrid DR
- Better than Disaster Recovery Linux Manager:
- Editor score 8.6 vs 6.6
A guided hybrid DR platform with failover orchestration, testing, and broad workload coverage.
- Failback orchestration
- Recovery runbooks
- Failover orchestration
8.6/10★★★★☆Visit Infrascale -
Best forOrganizations needing broad backup-led DR
- Better than Disaster Recovery Linux Manager:
- Editor score 8.5 vs 6.6
Broad backup-led disaster recovery with strong workload coverage and contact-sales pricing.
8.5/10★★★★☆Visit Arcserve UDP -
Best forNetApp storage estates needing VM DR
- Better than Disaster Recovery Linux Manager:
- Editor score 8.4 vs 6.6
A focused DR service for NetApp storage estates protecting VMware and Kubernetes workloads.
- Failback orchestration
- Recovery runbooks
- Failover orchestration
8.4/10★★★★☆Visit NetApp -
Best forIBM Power environments
- Better than Disaster Recovery Linux Manager:
- Editor score 8.3 vs 6.6
A specialized choice for automated failover, recovery, and replication across IBM Power environments.
- Failback orchestration
- Failover orchestration
- Test failover
8.3/10★★★★☆Visit IBM -
Best forKubernetes teams wanting a free DR tier
- Better than Disaster Recovery Linux Manager:
- Editor score 8.2 vs 6.6
A strong Kubernetes-focused DR platform with a useful free tier and broad mobility.
- Recovery runbooks
- Failover orchestration
- Test failover
8.2/10★★★★☆Visit Veeam -
Best forEnterprises prioritizing cyber-resilient recovery
- Better than Disaster Recovery Linux Manager:
- Editor score 8.1 vs 6.6
A cloud-managed service for orchestrated, cyber-resilient recovery across hybrid environments.
- Failover orchestration
- Test failover
8.1/10★★★★☆Visit IBM -
Best forMixed-workload teams wanting recovery assurance
- Better than Disaster Recovery Linux Manager:
- Editor score 8.0 vs 6.6
Mixed-workload backup with recovery testing, immutable storage, and broad infrastructure support.
8.0/10★★★★☆Visit Unitrends
Disaster Recovery Linux Manager Alternatives: Common Questions
What is the best alternative to Disaster Recovery Linux Manager?
Azure Site Recovery: #1 in our Disaster Recovery Software ranking, with an editor score of 9.4 out of 10. Broad hybrid workload coverage with orchestration, testing, and a 31-day trial.
Is there a free alternative to Disaster Recovery Linux Manager?
Yes. Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes has a free plan or a free tier.
Why do people look for Disaster Recovery Linux Manager alternatives?
Does not provide verified failover orchestration; Does not include test failover capabilities; Focused on GNU/Linux systems rather than broader platform coverage.
Which Disaster Recovery Linux Manager alternative has the most rpo target?
Azure Site Recovery, with 0.5 min.
How do I switch from Disaster Recovery Linux Manager?
Export your data from Disaster Recovery Linux Manager (most tools have an export in their settings). Sign up for the alternative; start on its free plan or trial if it has one. Import your export and set up the integrations your team relies on. Run both side by side for a short while, then cancel Disaster Recovery Linux Manager.
How to Switch from Disaster Recovery Linux Manager
- Export your data from Disaster Recovery Linux Manager (most tools have an export in their settings).
- Sign up for the alternative; start on its free plan or trial if it has one.
- Import your export and set up the integrations your team relies on.
- Run both side by side for a short while, then cancel Disaster Recovery Linux Manager.
Disaster Recovery Linux Manager vs Each Alternative
| # | Tool | Free plan | Paid from | Failover orchestration | Deployment model | Supported workloads | Failback orchestration | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 | Disaster Recovery Linux Manager | Yes | Free | On-premises | GNU/Linux systems, including physical and virtual systems | 6.6 | ||
| 1 | Azure Site Recovery | No | Yes | Hybrid | Azure VMs; VMware VMs; Hyper-V VMs; Windows physical servers; Linux physical servers; Azure Stack VMs; AWS Windows instances | Yes | 9.4 | |
| 2 | Veeam Recovery Orchestrator | No | Yes | On-premises | VMware vSphere VMs, Hyper-V VMs, Veeam agent backups, CDP replicas, storage-replicated VMs, Microsoft Azure recovery workloads | Yes | 9.3 | |
| 3 | VMware Live Site Recovery | Yes | Hybrid | virtual machines | Yes | 9.2 | ||
| 4 | AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery | No | $0.03/unit usage-based | No | Hybrid | physical servers, VMware vSphere, Microsoft Hyper-V, Amazon EC2, other cloud infrastructure, Windows and Linux applications, Oracle, MySQL, SQL Server, SAP | Yes | 9.0 |
| 5 | Acronis Disaster Recovery | Yes | Hybrid | Windows Server, Exchange, SQL Server, SharePoint, Active Directory, Linux Server, Hyper-V, VMware vSphere, Proxmox, Nutanix, Scale Computing, Citrix XenServer | Yes | 9.0 | ||
| 6 | Zerto | No | 8.9 | |||||
| 7 | Arcserve Replication and High Availability | No | Yes | Hybrid | Windows and Linux systems; physical and virtual machines; Exchange, SQL Server, SharePoint, IIS, Hyper-V, Dynamics CRM, VMware vCenter, Oracle Database, custom applications | Yes | 8.8 | |
| 8 | Datto SIRIS | Yes | Hybrid | Windows Server, Linux, VMware, Hyper-V | Yes | 8.7 | ||
| 9 | Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery | No | Yes | Hybrid | Physical servers, virtual machines, Windows, Linux, VMware, Hyper-V, SQL Server, Exchange Server | Yes | 8.6 | |
| 10 | Arcserve UDP | No | 8.5 | |||||
| 11 | NetApp Disaster Recovery | No | Yes | Hybrid | VMware virtual machines; Kubernetes clusters | Yes | 8.4 | |
| 12 | IBM PowerHA SystemMirror | No | Yes | Hybrid | AIX, IBM i, DB2, Oracle, SAP, WebSphere | Yes | 8.3 | |
| 13 | Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes | Yes | Yes | Hybrid | Kubernetes applications, containerized applications, virtual machines on Kubernetes, AI workloads, relational and NoSQL systems | 8.2 | ||
| 14 | IBM Storage Defender Data Resiliency Service | Yes | Hybrid | virtual machines, storage systems, backup systems, applications | 8.1 | |||
| 15 | Unitrends Backup | No | 8.0 |
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update