Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

DecodingTrust

Free#27 of 29 in LLM Evaluation Tools

DecodingTrust: A safety-focused research toolkit with broad evaluations and self-hosted execution. Ranked #27 of 29 in LLM Evaluation Tools by our editors (6.6/10); pricing: Open source; best for safety researchers studying trust and robustness.

6.6/10Editor score
DecodingTrust6.6 Visit DecodingTrust

At a glance

  • Editor score
    6.6 / 10
  • Pricing
    Open source
  • Best for
    Safety researchers studying trust and robustness
  • Paid from
    Free
  • Deployment options
    Self-hosted
  • Facts checked
    20 Sep 2026
DecodingTrust screenshot
  • Where it wins

    • Covers toxicity, bias, robustness, privacy, ethics, and fairness
    • Supports configurable model and dataset evaluation runs
    • Runs through Docker, Singularity, Python packages, or Git
  • Where it doesn't

    • Requires self-hosted deployment
    • Does not provide verified custom metrics
    • Lacks integrations and CI support

Our verdict on DecodingTrust

DecodingTrust is an open-source research benchmark and evaluation toolkit for assessing the trustworthiness of large language models. It is designed for safety researchers and practitioners who need structured evaluations across toxicity, stereotype and bias, adversarial robustness, out-of-distribution robustness, privacy, adversarial demonstrations, machine ethics, and fairness. The project provides datasets, evaluation scripts, configuration files, and reproducible workflows. It primarily evaluates GPT-3.5 and GPT-4, while also supporting Hugging Face and locally hosted causal language models.

Its main strength is evaluation breadth within safety and trustworthiness research. Configurable model and dataset evaluation runs let teams shape experiments around their research questions instead of relying on a single fixed benchmark. Docker and Singularity execution support reproducible local workflows, while installation is available through Python packages, Git, Docker, or Singularity. This makes DecodingTrust a fit for teams that can manage their own environment and want direct control over datasets, scripts, and model evaluation.

The trade-off is its self-hosted, research-oriented structure. DecodingTrust is not presented as a hosted commercial SaaS product, and its positioning does not include verified custom metrics, integrations, or CI support. Teams seeking a focused safety benchmark with local execution should consider it; teams that need managed infrastructure, connected evaluation workflows, or continuous integration support should choose an alternative. Its scope is strongest when trust, robustness, privacy, and fairness are central requirements rather than secondary checks.

Your product? Our editors can test DecodingTrust in depth and publish a review, labelled as paid · from $149/mo →

DecodingTrust pricing

Plans Open sourceFree Free to use — no paid tier required for the core job.
See plans on decodingtrust.github.io

DecodingTrust fact sheet

Free planNot verified
Paid fromFree
Deployment optionsSelf-hosted
Custom metricsNot verified
LLM-as-a-judgeNot verified
Safety evaluationsYes
Human review workflowsNot verified
Prompt versioningNot verified
CI/CD integrationNot verified
DeploymentSelf-hosted
SupportEmail, Docs
PricingOpen source
Websitedecodingtrust.github.io
Facts checked20 Sep 2026

Alternatives to DecodingTrust

See all DecodingTrust alternatives →

Used DecodingTrust? Be the first to review it

The editor score above is our own research. What this page doesn't have yet is a reader's view — what you used DecodingTrust for, what worked and what didn't. No stars are seeded and no review is paid for; an editor reads every one before it appears.

Write a reviewTwo minutes · verified accounts only · read by an editor before it appears

Reviews come only from verified accounts. Sign in or create an account first — your e-mail is never shown.

Your rating

0 characters · at least 80, up to 3,000

Posted from your verified account. Reviews appear after an editor reads them, usually within two working days.

Featured on iTechGuides

Featured on iTechGuides — DecodingTrust 6.6/10

DecodingTrust is listed in our LLM Evaluation Tools directory. Add the badge to your site — it links back to this page.

<a href="https://www.itechguides.com/products/decodingtrust/"><img src="https://www.itechguides.com/best/badge/decodingtrust.svg" alt="Featured on iTechGuides" width="230" height="46"></a>

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update