Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Conduit Platform review

Free#14 of 28 in Backend as a Service

A broad open-source backend for teams that want APIs and realtime features on their own infrastructure.

7.1/10Editor score
Conduit Platform7.1 Try Conduit Platform

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Conduit Platform is an open-source, self-hosted Backend-as-a-Service for developers and product teams that want backend capabilities on their own infrastructure. Its modular scope covers authentication, databases, file storage, authorization, realtime chat, communications, routing, and server-side functions. Teams can deploy it with Docker, Kubernetes, or from source, while applications can use web and API access through REST or GraphQL exposure.

The platform’s main strength is breadth across backend building blocks. It supports MongoDB and PostgreSQL, schema-based CRUD routes, custom database endpoints, and fine-grained authorization with team scoping. Authentication options include email/password, social providers, magic links, API keys, and two-factor authentication. File handling supports local storage, S3, Azure, Google Cloud, and Aliyun, with signed URLs and public or private access. Realtime chat rooms, messages, and Socket.io delivery extend the platform beyond basic API generation, while webhooks and scheduled jobs support server-side workflows.

Conduit also fits teams with an established cloud or infrastructure preference. Its integrations include MongoDB, PostgreSQL, AWS S3, S3-compatible storage, Microsoft Azure Blob Storage, Google Cloud Storage, Alibaba Cloud OSS, and several social or developer identity providers, including Apple, GitHub, GitLab, Google, LinkedIn, and others. The trade-off is operational ownership: the currently documented model centers on self-hosted deployment, and managed hosting is coming soon. Conduit suits teams that value control, integration breadth, and an open-source backend; teams seeking an immediately vendor-managed service should consider a different approach.

Conduit Platform pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Supports MongoDB, PostgreSQL, REST, and GraphQL APIs
    • Combines auth, storage, realtime chat, functions, and webhooks
    • Offers self-hosted deployment with fine-grained authorization
  • Where it doesn't
    • Requires a self-hosted deployment model
    • Server-side functions are JavaScript-based
    • Managed hosting is still coming soon

Conduit Platform fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update