Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

AWS Lake Formation review

#1 of 19 in Data Lake Software

A deep AWS-native governance layer for organizations building managed data lakes on Amazon S3.

9.4/10Editor score
AWS Lake Formation9.4 Visit site

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

AWS Lake Formation is a managed cloud service for building and governing data lakes on Amazon S3. It is designed for organizations that need centralized metadata, controlled access, auditing, and data sharing across AWS accounts, organizations, Regions, and external consumers. The service works with the AWS Glue Data Catalog and connects with AWS analytics tools including Athena, Redshift Spectrum, Glue, and EMR. Access is available through the web and through the Lake Formation API and AWS CLI, making it a fit for AWS-native data teams with both console and programmatic workflows.

Pricing is usage-based rather than organized around fixed subscription plans. Lake Formation permissions and cross-account sharing are provided at no charge, while integrated services and certain storage, API, governed-table, and optimizer usage incur separate charges. That structure makes the total cost depend on the surrounding AWS architecture and how the lake is operated. The broader ecosystem includes AWS Glue, Amazon Athena, Amazon Redshift, Amazon EMR, Amazon CloudTrail, Amazon DynamoDB, AWS Data Exchange, Google BigQuery, and MySQL. Teams should evaluate the combined service footprint rather than treating Lake Formation as an isolated subscription.

Its strongest distinction is governance depth: permissions can be applied at database, table, column, row, and cell levels, with tag-based and attribute-based controls, federated catalogs, bulk and incremental database loading, and CloudTrail-based access auditing. Support for Iceberg, Hudi, and Delta Lake tables also suits environments using open table formats. Organizations seeking a narrow, standalone lake tool may find the AWS service model and multiple separately charged components less suitable. AWS-focused teams that prioritize fine-grained governance, cross-account sharing, and integration with existing analytics services should consider Lake Formation.

AWS Lake Formation pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Database, table, column, row, and cell-level access controls
    • Cross-account and cross-organization data sharing with CloudTrail auditing
    • Supports Iceberg, Hudi, and Delta Lake tables across AWS analytics services
  • Where it doesn't
    • No free plan
    • No fixed subscription plans or universal starting price
    • Integrated services and some usage incur separate AWS charges

AWS Lake Formation fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update