Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Apache OpenWhisk review

Free#13 of 32 in Serverless HostingServerless Development FrameworksServerless Platforms

A self-managed, event-driven platform with flexible runtimes and Kubernetes deployment.

8.2/10Editor score
Apache OpenWhisk8.2 Try Apache OpenWhisk

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Apache OpenWhisk is an open-source platform for running functions in response to events or HTTP requests. It is aimed at teams that want to operate their own serverless environment, including developers building APIs, event-driven processing, scheduled jobs, or composed functions. Deployment options include local environments and Kubernetes, so it can fit teams that prefer to manage the platform rather than buy a vendor-hosted service.

Its event model is broader than a simple function endpoint: actions can be connected to triggers, rules, feeds, and sequences. Invocation can be synchronous or asynchronous, and web actions support HTTP handlers. REST access is available, while the wsk command-line tool and wskdeploy manifests provide management and application deployment paths. Docker-based runtimes allow custom execution environments; listed runtime languages include Go, Java, JavaScript/Node.js, .NET, PHP, Python, Ruby, Rust, Scala, and Swift. Integrations include Kafka, Cloudant, Slack, RSS, GitHub, and JIRA, making it relevant where event sources and existing services matter.

The key trade-off is operational responsibility: OpenWhisk is distributed as self-managed open-source software, not a vendor-hosted paid service. Kubernetes deployment support can suit teams already prepared to operate that environment, while teams looking for a managed service should consider hosted alternatives. The documentation describes a configurable action timeout range up to 300 seconds; that is a platform setting, not a paid-plan limit. Choose OpenWhisk when control over deployment and an event-driven programming model are priorities. It is a less natural fit for buyers who want a hosted product with a published plan and pricing structure.

Apache OpenWhisk pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Connects event feeds, triggers, and rules to serverless actions
    • Supports synchronous and asynchronous invocation plus compositions
    • Offers Docker runtimes, REST access, and Kubernetes deployment
  • Where it doesn't
    • Requires a self-managed deployment rather than a vendor-hosted service
    • Management centers on the wsk CLI and YAML deployment manifests
    • No paid hosted tier is described for teams seeking managed service

Apache OpenWhisk fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update