Veracode Static Analysis vs Coverity Static Analysis

Veracode Static Analysis8.7Visit Coverity Static Analysis6.8Visit

Higher score Veracode Static Analysis #5 in SAST Tools 8.7/10 Pricing on request ✓ 5 of 5 features Visit Veracode

vs

Coverity Static Analysis #23 in SAST Tools 6.8/10 Pricing on request ✓ 5 of 5 features Visit Coverity

• Veracode Static Analysis fits best

  Enterprises scanning source and binaries

• Coverity Static Analysis fits best

  Regulated teams needing broad SAST controls

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature	Veracode Static Analysis 8.7/10 Visit ↗	Coverity Static Analysis 6.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	8.7	6.8
Ranking	#5 in SAST Tools	#23 in SAST Tools
Best for	Enterprises scanning source and binaries	Regulated teams needing broad SAST controls
Pricing model	Paid	Paid
Starting price	Pricing on request	Pricing on request
Free plan	Not checked yet	—
Free trial	—	—
Features Veracode Static Analysis 5/5 · Coverity Static Analysis 5/5
Pull request scans	✓	✓
IDE support	✓	✓
CI/CD integration	✓	✓
Custom security rules	✓	✓
Automated fixes	✓	✓
Specs
Analysis targets	source code, bytecode, binaries	source code
Languages supported	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Our review
Pros	Analyzes source, binaries, bytecode, and hybrid application components Supports IDE, pull-request, CI/CD, API, and SCM integrations Adds control-flow, data-flow, CWE, policy, and AI-assisted remediation features	Supports 22 programming languages and more than 200 frameworks Combines pull-request scans, policy gates, IDE analysis, and custom checkers Offers on-premises and private-cloud deployment options
Cons	Pricing requires contacting sales The broad analysis model may exceed narrow SAST requirements Veracode Fix is an optional capability rather than a core scanning mode	Pricing requires a customized enterprise quote There is no free plan Its enterprise scope may exceed smaller teams’ requirements
Our verdict	Veracode Static Analysis is a cloud-based static application security testing service for development and security teams. It analyzes direct source code, compiled binaries, bytecode, third-party code, or hybrid application components… Read the review →	Coverity Static Analysis is an enterprise SAST product for development and security teams working across large-scale applications. It analyzes source code across files and libraries to identify security vulnerabilities, code-quality… Read the review →

Strengths and trade-offs

• Veracode Static Analysis — where it wins

  • Analyzes source, binaries, bytecode, and hybrid application components
  • Supports IDE, pull-request, CI/CD, API, and SCM integrations
  • Adds control-flow, data-flow, CWE, policy, and AI-assisted remediation features

  Where it doesn't

  • Pricing requires contacting sales
  • The broad analysis model may exceed narrow SAST requirements
  • Veracode Fix is an optional capability rather than a core scanning mode

• Coverity Static Analysis — where it wins

  • Supports 22 programming languages and more than 200 frameworks
  • Combines pull-request scans, policy gates, IDE analysis, and custom checkers
  • Offers on-premises and private-cloud deployment options

  Where it doesn't

  • Pricing requires a customized enterprise quote
  • There is no free plan
  • Its enterprise scope may exceed smaller teams’ requirements

• Veracode Static Analysis8.7/10 · Pricing on request

  A broad enterprise SAST service covering source, binaries, bytecode, and hybrid targets.

  Visit VeracodeFull verdict →
• Coverity Static Analysis6.8/10 · Pricing on request

  Broad language, framework, CI/CD, IDE, and deployment controls for regulated teams.

  Visit CoverityFull verdict →