uv vs conda

uv—Visit conda—Visit

uv #1 in Python Package Managers —/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 1 of 5 features Visit uv

vs

conda #4 in Python Package Managers —/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 1 of 5 features Visit conda

• uv fits best

  Modern all-in-one Python project management

• conda fits best

  Cross-platform Conda package management

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature	uv —/10 Visit ↗	conda —/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	—	—
Ranking	#1 in Python Package Managers	#4 in Python Package Managers
Best for	Modern all-in-one Python project management	Cross-platform Conda package management
Pricing model	Free	Free
Starting price	Not published	Not published
Free plan	✓	✓
Free trial	—	—
Deployment	Desktop	Self-hosted
Platforms	Windows, macOS, Linux	Windows, macOS, Linux
Support	Docs	Community, Docs
Built for	Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise	Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features uv 1/5 · conda 1/5
Lockfile support	✓	✓
Environment management	Not published	Not published
Package publishing	Not published	Not published
Private registry	Not published	Not published
Dependency groups	Not published	Not published
Specs
Supported platforms	Not published	Not published
Our review
Pros	Universal lockfiles support consistent resolution across macOS, Linux, and Windows Combines environments, Python versions, workspaces, builds, and publishing Supports private indexes, Git and local dependencies, caching, and offline operation	Resolves dependencies and platform requirements Creates isolated environments with cloning and rollback Supports native lockfiles, private channels, and offline installation
Cons	Its broad scope may be more than users seeking only pip-compatible installation need Cargo-style workspaces are useful mainly for multi-package repositories Additional architectures and operating systems have separate support tiers	Uses .conda and .tar.bz2 package formats Channel configuration adds an administrative decision Bundled distributions and repositories may have separate terms
Our verdict	uv is an open-source Python package and project manager from Astral, written in Rust. It is aimed at individual developers and teams that want one tool for dependency resolution, project and virtual-environment management, Python version… Read the review →	Conda is an open-source, cross-platform, language-agnostic binary package and environment manager. It installs and removes packages, resolves dependencies and platform requirements, and creates isolated environments for Python and other… Read the review →

Strengths and trade-offs

• uv — where it wins

  • Universal lockfiles support consistent resolution across macOS, Linux, and Windows
  • Combines environments, Python versions, workspaces, builds, and publishing
  • Supports private indexes, Git and local dependencies, caching, and offline operation

  Where it doesn't

  • Its broad scope may be more than users seeking only pip-compatible installation need
  • Cargo-style workspaces are useful mainly for multi-package repositories
  • Additional architectures and operating systems have separate support tiers

• conda — where it wins

  • Resolves dependencies and platform requirements
  • Creates isolated environments with cloning and rollback
  • Supports native lockfiles, private channels, and offline installation

  Where it doesn't

  • Uses .conda and .tar.bz2 package formats
  • Channel configuration adds an administrative decision
  • Bundled distributions and repositories may have separate terms

• uv—/10 · Free plan

  An open-source toolkit for managing modern Python projects from dependencies to publishing.

  Visit uvFull verdict →
• conda—/10 · Free plan

  An open-source manager for binary packages, dependencies, and isolated environments.

  Visit condaFull verdict →