Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Python Package Managers

uv vs conda

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 2 checks side by side
Higher score uv #1 in Python Package Managers 9.3/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 1 of 5 features Visit uv
conda #4 in Python Package Managers 8.8/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 1 of 5 features Visit conda

uv leads on 0 checks, conda on 0, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreuv · 9.3/10
  • Free planboth

uv scores higher on our rubric for python package managers: 9.3 against 8.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #4.

uv is the better fit for modern all-in-one Python project management. conda is the better fit for cross-platform Conda package management.

  • uv fits best

    Modern all-in-one Python project management

  • conda fits best

    Cross-platform Conda package management

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature uv 9.3/10 Visit ↗ conda 8.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.3 8.8
Ranking #1 in Python Package Managers #4 in Python Package Managers
Best for Modern all-in-one Python project management Cross-platform Conda package management
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Desktop Self-hosted
Platforms Windows, macOS, Linux Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Docs Community, Docs
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features uv 1/5 · conda 1/5
Lockfile support ✓ ✓
Environment management Not checked yet Not checked yet
Package publishing Not checked yet Not checked yet
Private registry Not checked yet Not checked yet
Dependency groups Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Supported platforms Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Universal lockfiles support consistent resolution across macOS, Linux, and Windows
  • Combines environments, Python versions, workspaces, builds, and publishing
  • Supports private indexes, Git and local dependencies, caching, and offline operation
  • Resolves dependencies and platform requirements
  • Creates isolated environments with cloning and rollback
  • Supports native lockfiles, private channels, and offline installation
Cons
  • Its broad scope may be more than users seeking only pip-compatible installation need
  • Cargo-style workspaces are useful mainly for multi-package repositories
  • Additional architectures and operating systems have separate support tiers
  • Uses .conda and .tar.bz2 package formats
  • Channel configuration adds an administrative decision
  • Bundled distributions and repositories may have separate terms
Our verdict

uv is an open-source Python package and project manager from Astral, written in Rust. It is aimed at individual developers and teams that want one tool for dependency resolution, project and virtual-environment management, Python version…

Read the review →

Conda is an open-source, cross-platform, language-agnostic binary package and environment manager. It installs and removes packages, resolves dependencies and platform requirements, and creates isolated environments for Python and other…

Read the review →
  1. uvPython Package Managers 9.3Free plan
  2. condaPython Package Managers 8.8Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • uv — where it wins

    • Universal lockfiles support consistent resolution across macOS, Linux, and Windows
    • Combines environments, Python versions, workspaces, builds, and publishing
    • Supports private indexes, Git and local dependencies, caching, and offline operation

    Where it doesn't

    • Its broad scope may be more than users seeking only pip-compatible installation need
    • Cargo-style workspaces are useful mainly for multi-package repositories
    • Additional architectures and operating systems have separate support tiers

  • conda — where it wins

    • Resolves dependencies and platform requirements
    • Creates isolated environments with cloning and rollback
    • Supports native lockfiles, private channels, and offline installation

    Where it doesn't

    • Uses .conda and .tar.bz2 package formats
    • Channel configuration adds an administrative decision
    • Bundled distributions and repositories may have separate terms
  • uv9.3/10 · Free plan

    An open-source toolkit for managing modern Python projects from dependencies to publishing.

    Visit uvFull verdict →
  • conda8.8/10 · Free plan

    An open-source manager for binary packages, dependencies, and isolated environments.

    Visit condaFull verdict →

More comparisons

All python package managers comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update