Head-to-head · CMDB Software
USU IT Service Management vs EasyVista Service Manager
Our verdict
- Highest scoreUSU IT Service Management · 6.7/10
USU IT Service Management scores higher on our rubric for cmdb software: 6.7 against 6.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #24 and #29.
USU IT Service Management is the better fit for enterprises combining CMDB with business service management. EasyVista Service Manager is the better fit for ITSM teams wanting discovery and dependency mapping.
- USU IT Service Management fits best
Enterprises combining CMDB with business service management
- EasyVista Service Manager fits best
ITSM teams wanting discovery and dependency mapping
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | USU IT Service Management 6.7/10 Visit ↗ | EasyVista Service Manager 6.2/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 6.7 | 6.2 |
| Ranking | #24 in CMDB Software | #29 in CMDB Software |
| Best for | Enterprises combining CMDB with business service management | ITSM teams wanting discovery and dependency mapping |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Starting price | Pricing on request | — |
| Free plan | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, Self-hosted | Cloud, Self-hosted |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Features USU IT Service Management 0/4 · EasyVista Service Manager 0/4 | ||
| Service mapping | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Dependency mapping | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Discovery imports | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Ownership tracking | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Specs | ||
| Configuration item limit | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Deployment options | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Relationship types | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | USU IT Service Management is a modular suite for organizations that need to design, deliver, operate and support IT services across departments. Its scope covers an IT service desk, ticket management, self-service portal, service shop,… Read the review → |
EasyVista Service Manager is an IT service management platform for enterprise IT teams, service desks, and organizations managing broader service operations. It brings incident, problem, change and release, service request, knowledge,… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
USU IT Service Management — where it wins
- Combines CMDB, change management and IT asset lifecycle management
- Extends workflows to HR, finance, facilities and other departments
- Adds service catalogs, knowledge management and AI-powered ticket analysis
Where it doesn't
- Contact-sales pricing makes plan-by-plan cost comparison difficult
- The broad suite may exceed the needs of CMDB-only buyers
- Limited listed integrations reduce visibility into ecosystem fit
EasyVista Service Manager — where it wins
- Discovery, inventory, dependency mapping, and CMDB in one platform
- No-code workflows and AI-driven automation support service operations
- Integrations span collaboration, monitoring, development, and enterprise tools
Where it doesn't
- Pricing requires a quote from sales
- The CMDB sits within a broader ITSM and ITOM suite
- Enterprise-oriented scope may exceed narrower CMDB requirements
- USU IT Service Management6.7/10 · Pricing on request
A broad CMDB and ITSM suite for enterprises extending service workflows beyond IT.
Visit USUFull verdict → - EasyVista Service Manager6.2/10 · Pricing on request
A broad ITSM and ITOM suite with discovery, dependency mapping, CMDB, and automation.
Visit EasyVistaFull verdict →
All CMDB software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update

