Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Crowd Testing Tools

UserTesting vs TestGate

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
TestGate #8 in Crowd Testing Tools 7.9/10 Pricing on request · 7-day trial Free trial Visit TestGate

UserTesting leads on 0 checks, TestGate on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Free trialonly TestGate

UserTesting and TestGate score identically on our rubric (7.9 out of 10) for crowd testing tools; UserTesting sits at #6 and TestGate at #8 in our editorial ranking, so the choice comes down to fit.

UserTesting is the better fit for enterprises sourcing broad user research studies. TestGate is the better fit for teams needing self-hosting or specialist test coverage.

  • UserTesting fits best

    Enterprises sourcing broad user research studies

  • TestGate fits best

    Teams needing self-hosting or specialist test coverage

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature UserTesting 7.9/10 Visit ↗ TestGate 7.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.9 7.9
Ranking #6 in Crowd Testing Tools #8 in Crowd Testing Tools
Best for Enterprises sourcing broad user research studies Teams needing self-hosting or specialist test coverage
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price — —
Free plan — —
Free trial — 7 days
Deployment Cloud, Mobile Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web, iOS, Android Web
Support Email, Community, Docs Email, Phone · 24/7
Compliance SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, SSO/SAML GDPR, ISO 27001, SSO/SAML
Integrations 10 integrations 9 integrations
Built for Enterprise, Mid-market Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Specs
Testing types Not checked yet functional, mobile app, web app, exploratory, UX/usability, localization, performance, security, beta, IoT
Tester sourcing Not checked yet Managed
Supported platforms Not checked yet iOS, Android, Windows, macOS, Linux, web browsers, smart TVs, wearables
Tester pool size Not checked yet 50000 testers
Bug report evidence Not checked yet screenshots, video, logs, reproduction steps
Issue tracker integrations Not checked yet Jira, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear, TestRail
Our review
Pros
  • Recruit participants globally or use your own audience.
  • Test websites, mobile apps, and prototypes in moderated or unmoderated studies.
  • AI insights and integrations support research and collaboration workflows.
  • Matches testers by device, location and skills across real-device environments.
  • Covers functional, UX, localization, security, performance, beta and IoT testing.
  • Offers self-hosted deployment, issue-tracker integrations, REST API and webhooks.
Cons
  • Plan pricing is quote-based and varies by users, test types, and features.
  • Its focus is user research rather than crowd-based software QA.
  • AI test creation, Smart tags, and Card sorting and tree testing are in Ultimate.
  • Growth limits teams to 5 active projects and 50 testers per project.
  • The published pricing model requires contacting sales for plan costs.
  • On-Demand uses pay-as-you-go pricing rather than a monthly plan commitment.
Our verdict

UserTesting helps product, UX, marketing, and customer-experience teams gather feedback on digital experiences. Researchers can recruit from its global opt-in participant network or bring their own audiences, then run recorded unmoderated…

Read the review →

TestGate is a managed crowdtesting platform for teams that need external testers to exercise software across real devices and environments. It supports functional, mobile, web, exploratory, UX, localization, performance, security, beta and…

Read the review →
  1. UserTestingCrowd Testing Tools 7.9Pricing on request
  2. TestGateCrowd Testing Tools 7.9Pricing on request · 7-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • UserTesting — where it wins

    • Recruit participants globally or use your own audience.
    • Test websites, mobile apps, and prototypes in moderated or unmoderated studies.
    • AI insights and integrations support research and collaboration workflows.

    Where it doesn't

    • Plan pricing is quote-based and varies by users, test types, and features.
    • Its focus is user research rather than crowd-based software QA.
    • AI test creation, Smart tags, and Card sorting and tree testing are in Ultimate.
  • TestGate — where it wins

    • Matches testers by device, location and skills across real-device environments.
    • Covers functional, UX, localization, security, performance, beta and IoT testing.
    • Offers self-hosted deployment, issue-tracker integrations, REST API and webhooks.

    Where it doesn't

    • Growth limits teams to 5 active projects and 50 testers per project.
    • The published pricing model requires contacting sales for plan costs.
    • On-Demand uses pay-as-you-go pricing rather than a monthly plan commitment.
  • UserTesting7.9/10 · Pricing on request

    A broad user research platform for moderated and unmoderated digital experience studies.

    Visit UserTestingFull verdict →
  • TestGate7.9/10 · Pricing on request · 7-day trial

    A broad crowdtesting service with managed tester matching and cloud or self-hosted deployment.

    Visit TestGateFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update