Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Crowd Testing Tools

Applause vs UserTesting

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Higher score Applause #1 in Crowd Testing Tools 8.9/10 Pricing on request Visit Applause
UserTesting #6 in Crowd Testing Tools 7.9/10 Pricing on request Visit UserTesting

Applause leads on 0 checks, UserTesting on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreApplause · 8.9/10

Applause scores higher on our rubric for crowd testing tools: 8.9 against 7.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #6.

Applause is the better fit for enterprises needing managed, broad-scope crowd testing. UserTesting is the better fit for enterprises sourcing broad user research studies.

  • Applause fits best

    Enterprises needing managed, broad-scope crowd testing

  • UserTesting fits best

    Enterprises sourcing broad user research studies

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Applause 8.9/10 Visit ↗ UserTesting 7.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.9 7.9
Ranking #1 in Crowd Testing Tools #6 in Crowd Testing Tools
Best for Enterprises needing managed, broad-scope crowd testing Enterprises sourcing broad user research studies
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request —
Free plan — —
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Mobile
Platforms Web Web, iOS, Android
Support Email, Phone, Live chat Email, Community, Docs
Compliance SOC 2, SSO/SAML SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, SSO/SAML
Integrations 15 integrations 10 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Enterprise, Mid-market
Specs
Testing types Functional testing; exploratory testing; accessibility testing; payment testing; UX testing; customer journey testing; localization testing; security testing; mobile app testing; website testing; desktop app testing; IoT testing; AR/VR testing Not checked yet
Tester sourcing Managed Not checked yet
Supported platforms Mobile apps; websites; desktop apps; IoT devices; AR/VR; automotive and in-store experiences; devices and operating systems Not checked yet
Tester pool size 1e+06 testers Not checked yet
Bug report evidence Screenshots; videos; log files Not checked yet
Issue tracker integrations Jira; Mantis; Bugzilla; Linear; GitHub; Azure; Redmine; Pivotal Tracker; Rally; Monday.com Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Managed tester matching by location, language, device and expertise
  • Covers functional, accessibility, UX, localization and security testing
  • Routes issues and results through integrations such as Jira and TestRail
  • Recruit participants globally or use your own audience.
  • Test websites, mobile apps, and prototypes in moderated or unmoderated studies.
  • AI insights and integrations support research and collaboration workflows.
Cons
  • Pricing is tailored to project scope and requires contacting sales
  • Managed tester engagement may not suit teams seeking a self-serve tool
  • Its broad service scope may be more than teams needing one narrow test type
  • Plan pricing is quote-based and varies by users, test types, and features.
  • Its focus is user research rather than crowd-based software QA.
  • AI test creation, Smart tags, and Card sorting and tree testing are in Ultimate.
Our verdict

Applause combines a cloud testing platform with managed access to a community of independent testers. It is aimed at mid-market and enterprise organizations that need testing across devices, operating systems, locations and languages, with…

Read the review →

UserTesting helps product, UX, marketing, and customer-experience teams gather feedback on digital experiences. Researchers can recruit from its global opt-in participant network or bring their own audiences, then run recorded unmoderated…

Read the review →
  1. ApplauseCrowd Testing Tools 8.9Pricing on request
  2. UserTestingCrowd Testing Tools 7.9Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Applause — where it wins

    • Managed tester matching by location, language, device and expertise
    • Covers functional, accessibility, UX, localization and security testing
    • Routes issues and results through integrations such as Jira and TestRail

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing is tailored to project scope and requires contacting sales
    • Managed tester engagement may not suit teams seeking a self-serve tool
    • Its broad service scope may be more than teams needing one narrow test type

  • UserTesting — where it wins

    • Recruit participants globally or use your own audience.
    • Test websites, mobile apps, and prototypes in moderated or unmoderated studies.
    • AI insights and integrations support research and collaboration workflows.

    Where it doesn't

    • Plan pricing is quote-based and varies by users, test types, and features.
    • Its focus is user research rather than crowd-based software QA.
    • AI test creation, Smart tags, and Card sorting and tree testing are in Ultimate.

More comparisons

All crowd testing tools comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update