Head-to-head · Crowd Testing Tools
Applause vs TestGate
Applause leads on 1 check, TestGate on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreApplause · 8.9/10
- Free trialonly TestGate
Applause scores higher on our rubric for crowd testing tools: 8.9 against 7.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #8.
Applause leads on tester pool size: 1e+06 testers versus 50000 testers.
Applause is the better fit for enterprises needing managed, broad-scope crowd testing. TestGate is the better fit for teams needing self-hosting or specialist test coverage.
- Applause fits best
Enterprises needing managed, broad-scope crowd testing
- TestGate fits best
Teams needing self-hosting or specialist test coverage
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Applause 8.9/10 Visit ↗ | TestGate 7.9/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 8.9 | 7.9 |
| Ranking | #1 in Crowd Testing Tools | #8 in Crowd Testing Tools |
| Best for | Enterprises needing managed, broad-scope crowd testing | Teams needing self-hosting or specialist test coverage |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Starting price | Pricing on request | — |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Free trial | — | 7 days |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud, Self-hosted |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Support | Email, Phone, Live chat | Email, Phone · 24/7 |
| Compliance | SOC 2, SSO/SAML | GDPR, ISO 27001, SSO/SAML |
| Integrations | 15 integrations | 9 integrations |
| Built for | Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Specs | ||
| Testing types | Functional testing; exploratory testing; accessibility testing; payment testing; UX testing; customer journey testing; localization testing; security testing; mobile app testing; website testing; desktop app testing; IoT testing; AR/VR testing | functional, mobile app, web app, exploratory, UX/usability, localization, performance, security, beta, IoT |
| Tester sourcing | Managed | Managed |
| Supported platforms | Mobile apps; websites; desktop apps; IoT devices; AR/VR; automotive and in-store experiences; devices and operating systems | iOS, Android, Windows, macOS, Linux, web browsers, smart TVs, wearables |
| Tester pool size | 1e+06 testers (best) | 50000 testers |
| Bug report evidence | Screenshots; videos; log files | screenshots, video, logs, reproduction steps |
| Issue tracker integrations | Jira; Mantis; Bugzilla; Linear; GitHub; Azure; Redmine; Pivotal Tracker; Rally; Monday.com | Jira, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear, TestRail |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Applause combines a cloud testing platform with managed access to a community of independent testers. It is aimed at mid-market and enterprise organizations that need testing across devices, operating systems, locations and languages, with… Read the review → |
TestGate is a managed crowdtesting platform for teams that need external testers to exercise software across real devices and environments. It supports functional, mobile, web, exploratory, UX, localization, performance, security, beta and… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Applause — where it wins
- Managed tester matching by location, language, device and expertise
- Covers functional, accessibility, UX, localization and security testing
- Routes issues and results through integrations such as Jira and TestRail
Where it doesn't
- Pricing is tailored to project scope and requires contacting sales
- Managed tester engagement may not suit teams seeking a self-serve tool
- Its broad service scope may be more than teams needing one narrow test type
TestGate — where it wins
- Matches testers by device, location and skills across real-device environments.
- Covers functional, UX, localization, security, performance, beta and IoT testing.
- Offers self-hosted deployment, issue-tracker integrations, REST API and webhooks.
Where it doesn't
- Growth limits teams to 5 active projects and 50 testers per project.
- The published pricing model requires contacting sales for plan costs.
- On-Demand uses pay-as-you-go pricing rather than a monthly plan commitment.
- Applause8.9/10 · Pricing on request
A managed tester community and platform for broad, real-world software testing.
Visit ApplauseFull verdict → - TestGate7.9/10 · Pricing on request · 7-day trial
A broad crowdtesting service with managed tester matching and cloud or self-hosted deployment.
Visit TestGateFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Applause vs Crowd4Test
- Applause vs Centercode
- Applause vs Test IO
- Applause vs Testbirds
- Applause vs UserTesting
- Applause vs Testlio
- Crowd4Test vs TestGate
- Centercode vs TestGate
All crowd testing tools comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update






