Head-to-head · Application Dependency Mapping Software
uControl uMap vs Device42
uControl uMap leads on 1 check, Device42 on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreuControl uMap · 8.9/10
- Free planonly uControl uMap
- Most featuresuControl uMap · 3 of 3
uControl uMap scores higher on our rubric for application dependency mapping software: 8.9 against 8.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #6 and #8.
uControl uMap offers free plan; Device42 doesn't.
uControl uMap is the better fit for organizations wanting no-code dependency modeling. Device42 is the better fit for IT asset and dependency mapping teams.
- uControl uMap fits best
Organizations wanting no-code dependency modeling
- Device42 fits best
IT asset and dependency mapping teams
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | uControl uMap 8.9/10 Visit ↗ | Device42 8.7/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Ranking | #6 in Application Dependency Mapping Software | #8 in Application Dependency Mapping Software |
| Best for | Organizations wanting no-code dependency modeling | IT asset and dependency mapping teams |
| Pricing model | Free plan + paid | Paid |
| Starting price | £10,000/yr | Pricing on request |
| Free plan | ✓ (best) | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, Self-hosted | Self-hosted |
| Support | Email, Phone | Tickets, Docs |
| Integrations | 8 integrations | 40+ integrations |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features uControl uMap 3/3 · Device42 0/3 | ||
| Real-time updates | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| Impact analysis | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| Business service views | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| Specs | ||
| Discovery approach | Hybrid | Not checked yet |
| Deployment model | Hybrid | Not checked yet |
| Mapped entity limit | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | uMap is TekWurx uControl’s no-code service-mapping capability for IT operations, service owners, architects, and risk teams. It automatically detects relationships across hardware, software, and networks, then builds single- and multi-tier… Read the review → |
Device42 is an IT infrastructure management platform for organizations managing data centers, cloud environments, and hybrid IT. It combines automated discovery with physical, virtual, cloud, and software inventory, a configuration… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
uControl uMap — where it wins
- No-code models application, service, hardware, software, and network relationships
- Live topology, drift monitoring, and upstream/downstream impact analysis
- Publishes services and relationships to CMDBs and BMC Discovery
Where it doesn't
- Community is limited to on-premises deployment
- Cloud or appliance deployment begins with the £10,000 SMB plan
- High availability and multiple environments are Enterprise-tier features
Device42 — where it wins
- Agentless and agent-based discovery across physical, virtual, and cloud environments
- CMDB-backed application, asset, software, and infrastructure dependency mapping
- REST APIs, webhooks, mobile inventory, and many ITSM integrations
Where it doesn't
- No permanent free plan
- The 14-day evaluation is limited to 100 devices
- Pricing requires contacting sales
- uControl uMap8.9/10 · Free plan
A no-code mapper for live application dependencies, impact analysis, and business-service views.
Visit uControlFull verdict → - Device428.7/10 · Pricing on request
A broad hybrid-IT mapping platform with CMDB, inventory, lifecycle, and integration coverage.
Visit Device42Full verdict →
More comparisons
- ServiceNow Service Mapping vs uControl uMap
- ServiceNow Service Mapping vs Device42
- OpenText Universal Discovery and CMDB vs uControl uMap
- Faddom vs uControl uMap
- Faddom vs Device42
- Tripl-i vs uControl uMap
- Tripl-i vs Device42
- Mugato vs uControl uMap
All application dependency mapping software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update





