Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Zero Trust Network Access Software

Twingate vs Portnox ZTNA

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score Twingate #14 in Zero Trust Network Access Software 7.9/10 Free plan · 14-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 3 of 3 features Visit Twingate
Portnox ZTNA #23 in Zero Trust Network Access Software 6.9/10 Free plan · 30-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 3 of 3 features Visit Portnox

Twingate leads on 0 checks, Portnox ZTNA on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreTwingate · 7.9/10
  • Free planboth
  • Free trialboth

Twingate scores higher on our rubric for zero trust network access software: 7.9 against 6.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #14 and #23.

On access methods, Portnox ZTNA gives you Both where Twingate offers Agent.

Twingate is the better fit for teams seeking affordable agent-based private access. Portnox ZTNA is the better fit for security-focused teams wanting session controls.

  • Twingate fits best

    Teams seeking affordable agent-based private access

  • Portnox ZTNA fits best

    Security-focused teams wanting session controls

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Twingate 7.9/10 Visit ↗ Portnox ZTNA 6.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.9 6.9
Ranking #14 in Zero Trust Network Access Software #23 in Zero Trust Network Access Software
Best for Teams seeking affordable agent-based private access Security-focused teams wanting session controls
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price $5/user/mo Free plan · 30-day trial
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial 14 days 30 days
Free trial length 14 days 30 days
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, Chrome extension Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android
Support Email, Docs Community, Docs · 24/7
Integrations 14 integrations 10 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Twingate 3/3 · Portnox ZTNA 3/3
Device posture checks ✓ ✓
SIEM log export ✓ ✓
Session recording ✓ ✓
Specs
Deployment model Hybrid Hybrid
Access methods Agent Both
Private app connectors Not checked yet Not checked yet
Supported app protocols TCP, UDP, ICMP RDP, SSH, VNC, Telnet
Our review
Pros
  • Free plan plus a $5 annual per-user entry tier
  • Device posture checks, conditional access, and resource-level policies
  • Connectors support Docker, Helm, Terraform, and hybrid deployments
  • Passwordless, certificate-based authentication with continuous posture checks
  • Supports SaaS, private applications, RDP, SSH, VNC, and Telnet
  • Session recording, remediation, audit trails, monitoring, and alerts
Cons
  • Access is primarily agent-based
  • Starter is limited to 5 users and 50 Resources
  • Enterprise pricing and account sizes are custom
  • The free version may have different feature scope from paid offerings
  • Private resources require a Docker-based gateway for hosted access
  • It is proprietary rather than open source
Our verdict

Twingate is a zero trust network access platform for organizations replacing legacy VPNs and controlling access to private applications and networks. It binds connections to verified identities, applies resource-level policies, and…

Read the review →

Portnox ZTNA is a cloud-native zero trust network access service for teams that need identity-aware, device-aware access to SaaS and private applications. It evaluates user identity, device certificates, and device security posture before…

Read the review →
  1. TwingateZero Trust Network Access Software 7.9Free plan · 14-day trial
  2. Portnox ZTNAZero Trust Network Access Software 6.9Free plan · 30-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Twingate — where it wins

    • Free plan plus a $5 annual per-user entry tier
    • Device posture checks, conditional access, and resource-level policies
    • Connectors support Docker, Helm, Terraform, and hybrid deployments

    Where it doesn't

    • Access is primarily agent-based
    • Starter is limited to 5 users and 50 Resources
    • Enterprise pricing and account sizes are custom
  • Portnox ZTNA — where it wins

    • Passwordless, certificate-based authentication with continuous posture checks
    • Supports SaaS, private applications, RDP, SSH, VNC, and Telnet
    • Session recording, remediation, audit trails, monitoring, and alerts

    Where it doesn't

    • The free version may have different feature scope from paid offerings
    • Private resources require a Docker-based gateway for hosted access
    • It is proprietary rather than open source
  • Twingate7.9/10 · Free plan · 14-day trial

    Affordable agent-based private access with posture checks, connectors, and policy controls.

    Visit TwingateFull verdict →
  • Portnox ZTNA6.9/10 · Free plan · 30-day trial

    A posture-aware ZTNA service with passwordless access, session controls, and broad integrations.

    Visit PortnoxFull verdict →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update