Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Test Flakiness Management Software

Trunk Flaky Tests vs Captain

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score Trunk Flaky Tests #2 in Test Flakiness Management Software 9.3/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 5 features Visit Trunk
Captain #5 in Test Flakiness Management Software 8.8/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 5 features Visit Captain

Trunk Flaky Tests leads on 0 checks, Captain on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreTrunk Flaky Tests · 9.3/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresCaptain · 3 of 5

Trunk Flaky Tests scores higher on our rubric for test flakiness management software: 9.3 against 8.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #5.

Trunk Flaky Tests is the better fit for large CI estates needing broad framework coverage. Captain is the better fit for open-source teams seeking low-cost flake analytics.

  • Trunk Flaky Tests fits best

    Large CI estates needing broad framework coverage

  • Captain fits best

    Open-source teams seeking low-cost flake analytics

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Trunk Flaky Tests 9.3/10 Visit ↗ Captain 8.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.3 8.8
Ranking #2 in Test Flakiness Management Software #5 in Test Flakiness Management Software
Best for Large CI estates needing broad framework coverage Open-source teams seeking low-cost flake analytics
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price — $10/unit usage-based
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud
Platforms Web Web, macOS, Linux
Support Docs, Community Email, Live chat, Community, Docs
Compliance SOC 2 SOC 2
Integrations 15 integrations 5 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Trunk Flaky Tests 0/5 · Captain 3/5
Flake detection Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Quarantine workflow Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Failure clustering Not checked yet Not checked yet
Rerun policies Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Issue tracker links Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Supported frameworks Android, Bazel, Behave, cargo-nextest, Cypress, Dart Test, Go, GoogleTest, Gradle, Jasmine, Karma, Kotest, Maven, minitest, Mocha, Nightwatch, NUnit, Pest, PHPUnit, Playwright, Pytest, Robot Framework, RSpec, Swift Testing, Testplan, Vitest, XCTest xUnit, ExUnit, Ginkgo, go test, Bun, Cucumber, Cypress, Jest, Karma, Mocha, Playwright, TestCafe, Vitest, PHPUnit, pytest, unittest, Ruby Cucumber, minitest, RSpec
Our review
Pros
  • Supports 26 test frameworks and 12 CI providers
  • AI groups related failures and analyzes failure reasons
  • Automatic quarantine, historical tracking, and PR comments
  • Open-source mode includes detection, quarantine, retries, and partitioning
  • Pro adds flaky-test analytics and 90-day performance retention
  • Supports major CI platforms and a broad range of test frameworks
Cons
  • Team and Enterprise pricing may require clarification
  • On-premise deployment is in private preview
  • Its broad coverage may exceed smaller teams' needs
  • Integration coverage is narrower than some category alternatives
  • Automatic partition rebalancing is limited to the Pro plan
  • Advanced cloud analytics require paid usage-based pricing
Our verdict

Trunk Flaky Tests is a CI-focused platform for engineering and QA teams that need to identify inconsistent test behavior and reduce the disruption caused by flaky tests. It processes uploaded CI test results, detects flaky tests, groups…

Read the review →

Captain is an open-source command-line tool and cloud service for software engineering teams managing unreliable test suites. It detects flaky tests, retries failed and flaky tests, supports quarantine workflows, partitions test suites…

Read the review →
  1. Trunk Flaky TestsTest Flakiness Management Software 9.3Free plan
  2. CaptainTest Flakiness Management Software 8.8Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Trunk Flaky Tests — where it wins

    • Supports 26 test frameworks and 12 CI providers
    • AI groups related failures and analyzes failure reasons
    • Automatic quarantine, historical tracking, and PR comments

    Where it doesn't

    • Team and Enterprise pricing may require clarification
    • On-premise deployment is in private preview
    • Its broad coverage may exceed smaller teams' needs
  • Captain — where it wins

    • Open-source mode includes detection, quarantine, retries, and partitioning
    • Pro adds flaky-test analytics and 90-day performance retention
    • Supports major CI platforms and a broad range of test frameworks

    Where it doesn't

    • Integration coverage is narrower than some category alternatives
    • Automatic partition rebalancing is limited to the Pro plan
    • Advanced cloud analytics require paid usage-based pricing
  • Trunk Flaky Tests9.3/10 · Free plan

    A broad flakiness-management option for large, multi-framework CI estates.

    Visit TrunkFull verdict →
  • Captain8.8/10 · Free plan

    A low-cost option for open-source teams needing flake detection and CI test controls.

    Visit CaptainFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update