Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Test Flakiness Management Software

Captain vs Develocity

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Captain #5 in Test Flakiness Management Software 8.8/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 5 features Visit Captain
Develocity #7 in Test Flakiness Management Software 8.6/10 Pricing on request · 30-day trial Free trial✓ 4 of 5 features Visit Develocity

Captain leads on 1 check, Develocity on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreCaptain · 8.8/10
  • Free planonly Captain
  • Free trialonly Develocity
  • Most featuresDevelocity · 4 of 5

Captain scores higher on our rubric for test flakiness management software: 8.8 against 8.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #7.

Captain offers free plan; Develocity doesn't.

Captain is the better fit for open-source teams seeking low-cost flake analytics. Develocity is the better fit for build engineering teams with complex build systems.

  • Captain fits best

    Open-source teams seeking low-cost flake analytics

  • Develocity fits best

    Build engineering teams with complex build systems

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Captain 8.8/10 Visit ↗ Develocity 8.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.8 8.6
Ranking #5 in Test Flakiness Management Software #7 in Test Flakiness Management Software
Best for Open-source teams seeking low-cost flake analytics Build engineering teams with complex build systems
Pricing model Free plan + paid Paid
Starting price $10/unit usage-based Pricing on request · 30-day trial
Free plan ✓ (best) —
Free trial — 30 days
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web, macOS, Linux Web
Support Email, Live chat, Community, Docs Email, Phone, Docs
Compliance SOC 2 SOC 2, GDPR, SSO/SAML
Integrations 5 integrations 16 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Captain 3/5 · Develocity 4/5
Flake detection ✓ ✓
Quarantine workflow ✓ ✓
Failure clustering Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Rerun policies ✓ ✓
Issue tracker links Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Supported frameworks xUnit, ExUnit, Ginkgo, go test, Bun, Cucumber, Cypress, Jest, Karma, Mocha, Playwright, TestCafe, Vitest, PHPUnit, pytest, unittest, Ruby Cucumber, minitest, RSpec JUnit 4, JUnit 5, Spock, TestNG, Maven Surefire/Failsafe, Jest, Mocha, Cypress, pytest
Our review
Pros
  • Open-source mode includes detection, quarantine, retries, and partitioning
  • Pro adds flaky-test analytics and 90-day performance retention
  • Supports major CI platforms and a broad range of test frameworks
  • Detects flaky tests within and across builds using retry outcomes and shared inputs
  • Quarantines known-flaky tests and supports configurable retry limits
  • Build Scans include outcomes, stack traces, retry output, and timelines
Cons
  • Integration coverage is narrower than some category alternatives
  • Automatic partition rebalancing is limited to the Pro plan
  • Advanced cloud analytics require paid usage-based pricing
  • Requires contact with sales for pricing
  • No free plan is available
  • Its breadth may exceed the needs of teams with simple build systems
Our verdict

Captain is an open-source command-line tool and cloud service for software engineering teams managing unreliable test suites. It detects flaky tests, retries failed and flaky tests, supports quarantine workflows, partitions test suites…

Read the review →

Develocity is a software delivery platform for engineering and platform teams that need detailed visibility into build and test behavior. It captures build and test telemetry, provides Build Scans and analytics, detects flaky tests within…

Read the review →
  1. CaptainTest Flakiness Management Software 8.8Free plan
  2. DevelocityTest Flakiness Management Software 8.6Pricing on request · 30-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Captain — where it wins

    • Open-source mode includes detection, quarantine, retries, and partitioning
    • Pro adds flaky-test analytics and 90-day performance retention
    • Supports major CI platforms and a broad range of test frameworks

    Where it doesn't

    • Integration coverage is narrower than some category alternatives
    • Automatic partition rebalancing is limited to the Pro plan
    • Advanced cloud analytics require paid usage-based pricing
  • Develocity — where it wins

    • Detects flaky tests within and across builds using retry outcomes and shared inputs
    • Quarantines known-flaky tests and supports configurable retry limits
    • Build Scans include outcomes, stack traces, retry output, and timelines

    Where it doesn't

    • Requires contact with sales for pricing
    • No free plan is available
    • Its breadth may exceed the needs of teams with simple build systems
  • Captain8.8/10 · Free plan

    A low-cost option for open-source teams needing flake detection and CI test controls.

    Visit CaptainFull verdict →
  • Develocity8.6/10 · Pricing on request · 30-day trial

    A deep flakiness-management layer for complex builds, with commercial pricing and no free plan.

    Visit DevelocityFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update