Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Test Analytics Software

Testspace vs Trunk Flaky Tests

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Testspace #5 in Test Analytics Software 9.0/10 Free plan · 14-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 3 of 4 features Visit Testspace
Trunk Flaky Tests #6 in Test Analytics Software 8.9/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Trunk

Testspace leads on 0 checks, Trunk Flaky Tests on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreTestspace · 9.0/10
  • Free planboth
  • Free trialonly Testspace
  • Most featuresTrunk Flaky Tests · 4 of 4

Testspace scores higher on our rubric for test analytics software: 9.0 against 8.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #6.

Testspace is the better fit for teams wanting affordable broad test reporting. Trunk Flaky Tests is the better fit for CI teams focused on flaky-test reduction.

  • Testspace fits best

    Teams wanting affordable broad test reporting

  • Trunk Flaky Tests fits best

    CI teams focused on flaky-test reduction

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Testspace 9.0/10 Visit ↗ Trunk Flaky Tests 8.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 8.9
Ranking #5 in Test Analytics Software #6 in Test Analytics Software
Best for Teams wanting affordable broad test reporting CI teams focused on flaky-test reduction
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price $32/mo —
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial 14 days —
Deployment Cloud, Desktop Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web, Windows, macOS, Linux Web
Support Email, Community, Docs Docs, Community
Integrations 18 integrations 15 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Testspace 3/4 · Trunk Flaky Tests 4/4
Flaky-test detection ✓ ✓
Failure analysis ✓ ✓
Execution trend reports ✓ ✓
Self-hosted deployment Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Specs
Supported frameworks Catch, CppUTest, CTest, Google Test, Microsoft Unit Test Framework, NUnit, xUnit.net, JUnit, TestNG, Chutzpah, Intern, Jasmine, Jest, Karma, Lab, Mocha, Node-tap, Test'em, QUnit, PHPUnit, pytest, Unittest, Minitest, RSpec, Test::Unit Android, Bazel, Behave, cargo-nextest, Cypress, Dart Test, Go, GoogleTest, Gradle, Jasmine, Karma, Kotest, Maven, minitest, Mocha, Nightwatch, NUnit, Pest, PHPUnit, Playwright, Pytest, Robot Framework, RSpec, Swift Testing, Testplan, Vitest, XCTest
CI/CD integrations AppVeyor, Azure Pipelines, Bitbucket Pipelines, Buildkite, Circle CI, Codefresh, Drone, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins, Semaphore CI, Travis CI Azure DevOps Pipelines, Bitbucket Pipelines, Buildkite, CircleCI, Drone CI, GitHub Actions, GitLab, Jenkins, Semaphore, TeamCity, Travis CI
Data retention 30 days Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Supports automated, manual, and exploratory testing workflows
  • Tracks flaky tests, failures, coverage, trends, and custom metrics
  • Connects with major CI/CD, repository, and issue-tracking tools
  • Automatic quarantine helps keep flaky tests from blocking CI workflows.
  • AI failure grouping and history support faster failure analysis.
  • Supports many CI providers, test runners, ticketing tools, and alerts.
Cons
  • Free and Basic plans limit sessions, users, or private projects
  • Results are retained for 30 days by default
  • No AI features are included
  • Its focus is narrower than full test-reporting suites.
  • Enterprise features include custom billing rather than a listed price.
  • On-premise deployment is currently in private preview.
Our verdict

Testspace is a cloud-based test management and analytics platform for software teams that need one place for automated results, manual tests, exploratory observations, coverage data, static-analysis metrics, and custom measures. Automated…

Read the review →

Trunk Flaky Tests is a test analytics platform for engineering and QA teams that need to identify inconsistent test behavior in CI. It processes uploaded CI test results to detect flaky tests, analyze failure reasons, track stability over…

Read the review →
  1. TestspaceTest Analytics Software 9.0Free plan · 14-day trial
  2. Trunk Flaky TestsTest Analytics Software 8.9Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Testspace — where it wins

    • Supports automated, manual, and exploratory testing workflows
    • Tracks flaky tests, failures, coverage, trends, and custom metrics
    • Connects with major CI/CD, repository, and issue-tracking tools

    Where it doesn't

    • Free and Basic plans limit sessions, users, or private projects
    • Results are retained for 30 days by default
    • No AI features are included
  • Trunk Flaky Tests — where it wins

    • Automatic quarantine helps keep flaky tests from blocking CI workflows.
    • AI failure grouping and history support faster failure analysis.
    • Supports many CI providers, test runners, ticketing tools, and alerts.

    Where it doesn't

    • Its focus is narrower than full test-reporting suites.
    • Enterprise features include custom billing rather than a listed price.
    • On-premise deployment is currently in private preview.

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update