Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Test Analytics Software

Allure Report vs Trunk Flaky Tests

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Allure Report #1 in Test Analytics Software 9.4/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Allure Report
Trunk Flaky Tests #6 in Test Analytics Software 8.9/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Trunk

Allure Report leads on 0 checks, Trunk Flaky Tests on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreAllure Report · 9.4/10
  • Free planboth

Allure Report scores higher on our rubric for test analytics software: 9.4 against 8.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #6.

Allure Report is the better fit for open-source teams needing broad test analytics. Trunk Flaky Tests is the better fit for CI teams focused on flaky-test reduction.

  • Allure Report fits best

    Open-source teams needing broad test analytics

  • Trunk Flaky Tests fits best

    CI teams focused on flaky-test reduction

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Allure Report 9.4/10 Visit ↗ Trunk Flaky Tests 8.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.4 8.9
Ranking #1 in Test Analytics Software #6 in Test Analytics Software
Best for Open-source teams needing broad test analytics CI teams focused on flaky-test reduction
Pricing model Free Free plan + paid
Starting price Free plan —
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted, Desktop Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web, Windows, macOS, Linux Web
Support Community, Docs Docs, Community
Integrations 10 integrations 15 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Allure Report 4/4 · Trunk Flaky Tests 4/4
Flaky-test detection ✓ ✓
Failure analysis ✓ ✓
Execution trend reports ✓ ✓
Self-hosted deployment ✓ ✓
Specs
Supported frameworks AVA, Axios, Behat, Behave, Bun, Chai, Codeception, CodeceptJS, Cucumber.js, Cucumber-JVM, Cucumber.rb, Cypress, Dart and Flutter, Diesel, Fetch, Go, Jasmine, Jest, JBehave, JUnit 4, JUnit 5, Mocha, Newman, Node.js Test Runner, NUnit, PHPUnit, Playwright, Playwright Java, pytest, Pytest-BDD, Reqnroll, Reqwest, REST Assured, Robot Framework, Rust Cargo Test, RSpec, Selenide, Selenium BiDi, SpecFlow, Spock, TestCafe, TestNG, Vitest, WebdriverIO, xUnit.net Android, Bazel, Behave, cargo-nextest, Cypress, Dart Test, Go, GoogleTest, Gradle, Jasmine, Karma, Kotest, Maven, minitest, Mocha, Nightwatch, NUnit, Pest, PHPUnit, Playwright, Pytest, Robot Framework, RSpec, Swift Testing, Testplan, Vitest, XCTest
CI/CD integrations Azure DevOps, Bamboo, GitHub Actions, Jenkins, TeamCity Azure DevOps Pipelines, Bitbucket Pipelines, Buildkite, CircleCI, Drone CI, GitHub Actions, GitLab, Jenkins, Semaphore, TeamCity, Travis CI
Data retention Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Supports a wide range of programming languages and test frameworks
  • Tracks flaky tests, retries, history, failures, trends, and quality gates
  • Integrates with major CI/CD tools, IDEs, Jira, Maven, and Gradle
  • Automatic quarantine helps keep flaky tests from blocking CI workflows.
  • AI failure grouping and history support faster failure analysis.
  • Supports many CI providers, test runners, ticketing tools, and alerts.
Cons
  • Focused on test reporting rather than test execution or test management
  • Self-hosted report storage adds deployment and maintenance responsibilities
  • Teams need an existing automated test pipeline to generate results
  • Its focus is narrower than full test-reporting suites.
  • Enterprise features include custom billing rather than a listed price.
  • On-premise deployment is currently in private preview.
Our verdict

Allure Report is an open-source framework for turning automated test results into interactive HTML reports. It is intended for QA engineers, developers, testers, and project teams that need to inspect execution results and share reports…

Read the review →

Trunk Flaky Tests is a test analytics platform for engineering and QA teams that need to identify inconsistent test behavior in CI. It processes uploaded CI test results to detect flaky tests, analyze failure reasons, track stability over…

Read the review →
  1. Allure ReportTest Analytics Software 9.4Free plan
  2. Trunk Flaky TestsTest Analytics Software 8.9Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Allure Report — where it wins

    • Supports a wide range of programming languages and test frameworks
    • Tracks flaky tests, retries, history, failures, trends, and quality gates
    • Integrates with major CI/CD tools, IDEs, Jira, Maven, and Gradle

    Where it doesn't

    • Focused on test reporting rather than test execution or test management
    • Self-hosted report storage adds deployment and maintenance responsibilities
    • Teams need an existing automated test pipeline to generate results
  • Trunk Flaky Tests — where it wins

    • Automatic quarantine helps keep flaky tests from blocking CI workflows.
    • AI failure grouping and history support faster failure analysis.
    • Supports many CI providers, test runners, ticketing tools, and alerts.

    Where it doesn't

    • Its focus is narrower than full test-reporting suites.
    • Enterprise features include custom billing rather than a listed price.
    • On-premise deployment is currently in private preview.

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update