Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Quality Assurance Software

Testomat.io vs Tricentis qTest

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 2 checks side by side
Higher score Testomat.io #7 in Quality Assurance Software 7.0/10 Free plan · paid from $27/user/mo (annual) · 30-day trial Free plan✓ 1 of 4 features Visit Testomat.io
Tricentis qTest #8 in Quality Assurance Software 6.9/10 Pricing on request · 14-day trial ✓ 1 of 4 features Visit Tricentis

Testomat.io leads on 1 check, Tricentis qTest on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreTestomat.io · 7.0/10
  • Free planonly Testomat.io

Testomat.io scores higher on our rubric for quality assurance software: 7.0 against 6.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #7 and #8.

Testomat.io offers free plan; Tricentis qTest doesn't.

Testomat.io is the better fit for small teams wanting a free, automation-friendly QA hub. Tricentis qTest is the better fit for enterprise QA teams using Jira and automation.

  • Testomat.io fits best

    Small teams wanting a free, automation-friendly QA hub

  • Tricentis qTest fits best

    Enterprise QA teams using Jira and automation

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Testomat.io 7.0/10 Visit ↗ Tricentis qTest 6.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.0 6.9
Ranking #7 in Quality Assurance Software #8 in Quality Assurance Software
Best for Small teams wanting a free, automation-friendly QA hub Enterprise QA teams using Jira and automation
Pricing model Free plan + paid Paid
Starting price $27/user/mo Not published
Free plan ✓ (best) —
Free trial — —
Free trial length 30 days · no card needed 14 days
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Support Email, Live chat, Community, Docs Docs
Compliance GDPR, SSO/SAML SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR
Integrations 40+ integrations 11 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Enterprise, Mid-market
Features Testomat.io 1/4 · Tricentis qTest 1/4
Test case management ✓ ✓
Execution tracking Not published Not published
Defect linking Not published Not published
QA reporting Not published Not published
Specs
Automation support Not published Not published
Listed integrations Not published Not published
Our review
Pros
  • Manage test cases, suites, plans, runs and requirements in one place.
  • Connect frameworks and CI/CD tools, with API access for test results.
  • Analyze test failures with AI features and flaky-test detection.
  • Links requirements to test cases and results for traceability.
  • Plans releases and tracks test execution, runs, and results.
  • Connects with Jira, CI tools, automation frameworks, and REST APIs.
Cons
  • Free is limited to 2 users, 2 projects and 2 MB of attachments.
  • Professional costs $27 per user monthly with annual billing, or $30 monthly.
  • Enterprise pricing is custom, and several advanced capabilities sit on that tier.
  • Pricing requires contacting sales rather than choosing a public plan.
  • There is no perpetual free plan; access is limited to a 14-day trial.
  • Its broad planning and reporting scope may exceed smaller teams’ needs.
Our verdict

Testomat.io brings manual and automated test management into one workspace for QA, development, product and business teams. It organizes test cases, suites, plans, requirements, execution results and run history, with dashboards and…

Read the review →

For QA, development, and DevOps teams coordinating testing across releases, qTest brings requirements, test cases, planning, execution, automation results, defects, and reporting into one management workflow. It supports Agile, waterfall,…

Read the review →
  1. Testomat.ioQuality Assurance Software 7.0Free plan · paid from $27/user/mo (annual) · 30-day trial
  2. Tricentis qTestQuality Assurance Software 6.9Pricing on request · 14-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Testomat.io — where it wins

    • Manage test cases, suites, plans, runs and requirements in one place.
    • Connect frameworks and CI/CD tools, with API access for test results.
    • Analyze test failures with AI features and flaky-test detection.

    Where it doesn't

    • Free is limited to 2 users, 2 projects and 2 MB of attachments.
    • Professional costs $27 per user monthly with annual billing, or $30 monthly.
    • Enterprise pricing is custom, and several advanced capabilities sit on that tier.
  • Tricentis qTest — where it wins

    • Links requirements to test cases and results for traceability.
    • Plans releases and tracks test execution, runs, and results.
    • Connects with Jira, CI tools, automation frameworks, and REST APIs.

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting sales rather than choosing a public plan.
    • There is no perpetual free plan; access is limited to a 14-day trial.
    • Its broad planning and reporting scope may exceed smaller teams’ needs.
  • Testomat.io7.0/10 · Free plan · paid from $27/user/mo (annual) · 30-day trial

    A broad QA hub with a free entry tier, automation links and optional self-hosting.

    Visit Testomat.ioFull verdict →
  • Tricentis qTest6.9/10 · Pricing on request · 14-day trial

    A broad test-management workspace for teams coordinating QA across Jira and automation tools.

    Visit TricentisFull verdict →

More comparisons

Guides on quality assurance software

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026

Last updated · How we research and update