Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Quality Assurance Software

Qase vs Testomat.io

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score Qase #7 in Quality Assurance Software 8.5/10 Free plan · 14-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 1 of 4 features Visit Qase
Testomat.io #8 in Quality Assurance Software 8.4/10 Free plan · 30-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 1 of 4 features Visit Testomat.io

Qase leads on 0 checks, Testomat.io on 1, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreQase · 8.5/10
  • Lowest starting priceTestomat.io · $27/user/mo
  • Free planboth
  • Free trialboth

Qase scores higher on our rubric for quality assurance software: 8.5 against 8.4 out of 10; our editors rank them #7 and #8.

Testomat.io is cheaper to start at $27/user/mo against $35/user/mo.

Qase is the better fit for teams seeking a free start and broad integrations. Testomat.io is the better fit for small teams wanting a free, automation-friendly QA hub.

  • Qase fits best

    Teams seeking a free start and broad integrations

  • Testomat.io fits best

    Small teams wanting a free, automation-friendly QA hub

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Qase 8.5/10 Visit ↗ Testomat.io 8.4/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.5 8.4
Ranking #7 in Quality Assurance Software #8 in Quality Assurance Software
Best for Teams seeking a free start and broad integrations Small teams wanting a free, automation-friendly QA hub
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price $35/user/mo $27/user/mo (best)
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial 14 days 30 days
Free trial length 14 days · no card needed 30 days · no card needed
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Support Email, Live chat, Docs Email, Live chat, Community, Docs
Compliance SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, SSO/SAML, 2FA GDPR, SSO/SAML
Integrations 35+ integrations 40+ integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Qase 1/4 · Testomat.io 1/4
Test case management ✓ ✓
Execution tracking Not checked yet Not checked yet
Defect linking Not checked yet Not checked yet
QA reporting Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Automation support Not checked yet Not checked yet
Listed integrations Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Free plan covers up to 2 projects, test runs, traceability, and reporting.
  • Supports manual and automated runs with requirements and defect linking.
  • 35+ integrations connect issue trackers, CI tools, and test frameworks.
  • Manage test cases, suites, plans, runs and requirements in one place.
  • Connect frameworks and CI/CD tools, with API access for test results.
  • Analyze test failures with AI features and flaky-test detection.
Cons
  • Free plan is limited to 2 projects, 500 MB, and 30-day test history.
  • Teams requires at least five regular seats.
  • Enterprise is the only plan listing unlimited users and 24/5 support SLA.
  • Free is limited to 2 users, 2 projects and 2 MB of attachments.
  • Professional costs $27 per user monthly with annual billing, or $30 monthly.
  • Enterprise pricing is custom, and several advanced capabilities sit on that tier.
Our verdict

Qase is a cloud test management platform for QA and software development teams that need to organize test cases, plan cycles, track execution, and connect results to development work. It supports manual and automated test runs, defect…

Read the review →

Testomat.io brings manual and automated test management into one workspace for QA, development, product and business teams. It organizes test cases, suites, plans, requirements, execution results and run history, with dashboards and…

Read the review →
  1. QaseQuality Assurance Software 8.5Free plan · 14-day trial
  2. Testomat.ioQuality Assurance Software 8.4Free plan · 30-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Qase — where it wins

    • Free plan covers up to 2 projects, test runs, traceability, and reporting.
    • Supports manual and automated runs with requirements and defect linking.
    • 35+ integrations connect issue trackers, CI tools, and test frameworks.

    Where it doesn't

    • Free plan is limited to 2 projects, 500 MB, and 30-day test history.
    • Teams requires at least five regular seats.
    • Enterprise is the only plan listing unlimited users and 24/5 support SLA.
  • Testomat.io — where it wins

    • Manage test cases, suites, plans, runs and requirements in one place.
    • Connect frameworks and CI/CD tools, with API access for test results.
    • Analyze test failures with AI features and flaky-test detection.

    Where it doesn't

    • Free is limited to 2 users, 2 projects and 2 MB of attachments.
    • Professional costs $27 per user monthly with annual billing, or $30 monthly.
    • Enterprise pricing is custom, and several advanced capabilities sit on that tier.
  • Qase8.5/10 · Free plan · 14-day trial

    A broad test-management workspace with a free plan and a paid tier starting at $35 per user monthly.

    Visit QaseFull verdict →
  • Testomat.io8.4/10 · Free plan · 30-day trial

    A broad QA hub with a free entry tier, automation links and optional self-hosting.

    Visit Testomat.ioFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update