Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Quality Assurance Software

Tricentis qTest vs Testomat.io

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 2 checks side by side
Tricentis qTest #6 in Quality Assurance Software —/10 Pricing on request · 14-day trial ✓ 1 of 4 features Visit Tricentis
Higher score Testomat.io #8 in Quality Assurance Software 7.0/10 Free plan · paid from $27/user/mo (annual) · 30-day trial Free plan✓ 1 of 4 features Visit Testomat.io

Tricentis qTest leads on 0 checks, Testomat.io on 1, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreTestomat.io · 7.0/10
  • Free planonly Testomat.io

Our editors rank Tricentis qTest at #6 and Testomat.io at #8 for quality assurance software; Tricentis qTest has no rubric score yet (facts researched, not yet scored), so the checks below decide.

Testomat.io offers free plan; Tricentis qTest doesn't.

Tricentis qTest is the better fit for enterprise QA teams using Jira and automation. Testomat.io is the better fit for small teams wanting a free, automation-friendly QA hub.

  • Tricentis qTest fits best

    Enterprise QA teams using Jira and automation

  • Testomat.io fits best

    Small teams wanting a free, automation-friendly QA hub

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Tricentis qTest —/10 Visit ↗ Testomat.io 7.0/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score — 7.0
Ranking #6 in Quality Assurance Software #8 in Quality Assurance Software
Best for Enterprise QA teams using Jira and automation Small teams wanting a free, automation-friendly QA hub
Pricing model Paid Free plan + paid
Starting price Not published $27/user/mo
Free plan — ✓ (best)
Free trial — —
Free trial length 14 days 30 days · no card needed
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Support Docs Email, Live chat, Community, Docs
Compliance SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR GDPR, SSO/SAML
Integrations 11 integrations 40+ integrations
Built for Enterprise, Mid-market Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Tricentis qTest 1/4 · Testomat.io 1/4
Test case management ✓ ✓
Execution tracking Not published Not published
Defect linking Not published Not published
QA reporting Not published Not published
Specs
Automation support Not published Not published
Listed integrations Not published Not published
Our review
Pros
  • Links requirements to test cases and results for traceability.
  • Plans releases and tracks test execution, runs, and results.
  • Connects with Jira, CI tools, automation frameworks, and REST APIs.
  • Manage test cases, suites, plans, runs and requirements in one place.
  • Connect frameworks and CI/CD tools, with API access for test results.
  • Analyze test failures with AI features and flaky-test detection.
Cons
  • Pricing requires contacting sales rather than choosing a public plan.
  • There is no perpetual free plan; access is limited to a 14-day trial.
  • Its broad planning and reporting scope may exceed smaller teams’ needs.
  • Free is limited to 2 users, 2 projects and 2 MB of attachments.
  • Professional costs $27 per user monthly with annual billing, or $30 monthly.
  • Enterprise pricing is custom, and several advanced capabilities sit on that tier.
Our verdict

For QA, development, and DevOps teams coordinating testing across releases, qTest brings requirements, test cases, planning, execution, automation results, defects, and reporting into one management workflow. It supports Agile, waterfall,…

Read the review →

Testomat.io brings manual and automated test management into one workspace for QA, development, product and business teams. It organizes test cases, suites, plans, requirements, execution results and run history, with dashboards and…

Read the review →
  1. Tricentis qTestQuality Assurance Software —Pricing on request · 14-day trial
  2. Testomat.ioQuality Assurance Software 7.0Free plan · paid from $27/user/mo (annual) · 30-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Tricentis qTest — where it wins

    • Links requirements to test cases and results for traceability.
    • Plans releases and tracks test execution, runs, and results.
    • Connects with Jira, CI tools, automation frameworks, and REST APIs.

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting sales rather than choosing a public plan.
    • There is no perpetual free plan; access is limited to a 14-day trial.
    • Its broad planning and reporting scope may exceed smaller teams’ needs.

  • Testomat.io — where it wins

    • Manage test cases, suites, plans, runs and requirements in one place.
    • Connect frameworks and CI/CD tools, with API access for test results.
    • Analyze test failures with AI features and flaky-test detection.

    Where it doesn't

    • Free is limited to 2 users, 2 projects and 2 MB of attachments.
    • Professional costs $27 per user monthly with annual billing, or $30 monthly.
    • Enterprise pricing is custom, and several advanced capabilities sit on that tier.
  • Tricentis qTest—/10 · Pricing on request · 14-day trial

    A broad test-management workspace for teams coordinating QA across Jira and automation tools.

    Visit TricentisFull verdict →
  • Testomat.io7.0/10 · Free plan · paid from $27/user/mo (annual) · 30-day trial

    A broad QA hub with a free entry tier, automation links and optional self-hosting.

    Visit Testomat.ioFull verdict →

More comparisons

All quality assurance software comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026