Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Process Orchestration Software

Temporal vs Conductor

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Higher score Temporal #2 in Process Orchestration Software 9.0/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Temporal
Conductor #6 in Process Orchestration Software 8.6/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Conductor

Temporal leads on 0 checks, Conductor on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreTemporal · 9.0/10
  • Free planboth

Temporal scores higher on our rubric for process orchestration software: 9.0 against 8.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #6.

Temporal is the better fit for developers building durable code-defined workflows. Conductor is the better fit for open-source durable workflows with polyglot workers.

  • Temporal fits best

    Developers building durable code-defined workflows

  • Conductor fits best

    Open-source durable workflows with polyglot workers

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Temporal 9.0/10 Visit ↗ Conductor 8.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 8.6
Ranking #2 in Process Orchestration Software #6 in Process Orchestration Software
Best for Developers building durable code-defined workflows Open-source durable workflows with polyglot workers
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free
Starting price $500/mo Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Self-hosted, Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Support Community, Docs · 24/7 Community, Docs
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Temporal 0/4 · Conductor 0/4
Human tasks & approvals Not checked yet Not checked yet
Long-running workflows Not checked yet Not checked yet
Workflow versioning Not checked yet Not checked yet
Audit logs Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment model Hybrid Not checked yet
Concurrent runs Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Durable execution with persisted history, replay, retries, and backoff
  • Supports timers, schedules, signals, queries, updates, and approvals
  • Self-hosted or managed deployment with workflow visibility
  • Persists task progress for recovery after failures or restarts
  • Supports workers and SDKs across seven listed programming languages
  • Combines event triggers, retries, approvals, observability, and sub-workflows
Cons
  • Paid usage starts at $50 per million actions
  • No visual workflow builder
  • Verified integrations are absent
  • Self-hosted deployment requires Docker- or JVM-based infrastructure
  • The OSS distribution does not include the visual workflow editor
  • Its broad orchestration model may exceed simpler automation needs
Our verdict

Temporal is an open-source platform for building and running durable workflows. Developers define workflows and activities in code using supported SDKs, while Temporal persists execution state, records event history, handles failures, and…

Read the review →

Conductor is an open-source orchestration platform for microservices, AI agents, and durable workflow graphs. It defines versioned workflows as task graphs, runs them across services and workers, and persists task progress for recovery…

Read the review →
  1. TemporalProcess Orchestration Software 9.0Free plan
  2. ConductorProcess Orchestration Software 8.6Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Temporal — where it wins

    • Durable execution with persisted history, replay, retries, and backoff
    • Supports timers, schedules, signals, queries, updates, and approvals
    • Self-hosted or managed deployment with workflow visibility

    Where it doesn't

    • Paid usage starts at $50 per million actions
    • No visual workflow builder
    • Verified integrations are absent
  • Conductor — where it wins

    • Persists task progress for recovery after failures or restarts
    • Supports workers and SDKs across seven listed programming languages
    • Combines event triggers, retries, approvals, observability, and sub-workflows

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosted deployment requires Docker- or JVM-based infrastructure
    • The OSS distribution does not include the visual workflow editor
    • Its broad orchestration model may exceed simpler automation needs

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update