Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Process Orchestration Software

Flowable vs Conductor

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Higher score Flowable #4 in Process Orchestration Software 8.8/10 Free plan · 30-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Flowable
Conductor #6 in Process Orchestration Software 8.6/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Conductor

Flowable leads on 0 checks, Conductor on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreFlowable · 8.8/10
  • Free planboth
  • Free trialonly Flowable

Flowable scores higher on our rubric for process orchestration software: 8.8 against 8.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #6.

Flowable is the better fit for open-source BPMN, case, and decision orchestration. Conductor is the better fit for open-source durable workflows with polyglot workers.

  • Flowable fits best

    Open-source BPMN, case, and decision orchestration

  • Conductor fits best

    Open-source durable workflows with polyglot workers

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Flowable 8.8/10 Visit ↗ Conductor 8.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.8 8.6
Ranking #4 in Process Orchestration Software #6 in Process Orchestration Software
Best for Open-source BPMN, case, and decision orchestration Open-source durable workflows with polyglot workers
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free
Starting price — Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial 30 days —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Self-hosted, Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Support Tickets, Community, Docs Community, Docs
Integrations 30+ integrations 9 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Flowable 0/4 · Conductor 0/4
Human tasks & approvals Not checked yet Not checked yet
Long-running workflows Not checked yet Not checked yet
Workflow versioning Not checked yet Not checked yet
Audit logs Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment model Not checked yet Not checked yet
Concurrent runs Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Combines BPMN, CMMN, and DMN orchestration in one platform
  • Supports web, API, and self-hosted deployments
  • Includes forms, routing, testing, audit trails, and observability
  • Persists task progress for recovery after failures or restarts
  • Supports workers and SDKs across seven listed programming languages
  • Combines event triggers, retries, approvals, observability, and sub-workflows
Cons
  • Commercial pricing requires contacting sales
  • The 30-day access period applies to the cloud Case Platform
  • Community Edition support is community-based
  • Self-hosted deployment requires Docker- or JVM-based infrastructure
  • The OSS distribution does not include the visual workflow editor
  • Its broad orchestration model may exceed simpler automation needs
Our verdict

Flowable is a business process automation and case management platform for enterprises, with particular relevance to regulated operations. It brings together BPMN process orchestration, CMMN case management, DMN decision modeling,…

Read the review →

Conductor is an open-source orchestration platform for microservices, AI agents, and durable workflow graphs. It defines versioned workflows as task graphs, runs them across services and workers, and persists task progress for recovery…

Read the review →
  1. FlowableProcess Orchestration Software 8.8Free plan · 30-day trial
  2. ConductorProcess Orchestration Software 8.6Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Flowable — where it wins

    • Combines BPMN, CMMN, and DMN orchestration in one platform
    • Supports web, API, and self-hosted deployments
    • Includes forms, routing, testing, audit trails, and observability

    Where it doesn't

    • Commercial pricing requires contacting sales
    • The 30-day access period applies to the cloud Case Platform
    • Community Edition support is community-based
  • Conductor — where it wins

    • Persists task progress for recovery after failures or restarts
    • Supports workers and SDKs across seven listed programming languages
    • Combines event triggers, retries, approvals, observability, and sub-workflows

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosted deployment requires Docker- or JVM-based infrastructure
    • The OSS distribution does not include the visual workflow editor
    • Its broad orchestration model may exceed simpler automation needs

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update