Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Network Performance Monitoring Software

SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor vs AppNeta

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor #5 in Network Performance Monitoring Software 8.9/10 Pricing on request · 30-day trial Free trial✓ 0 of 4 features Visit SolarWinds
AppNeta #7 in Network Performance Monitoring Software 8.7/10 Pricing on request ✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Broadcom

SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor leads on 0 checks, AppNeta on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreSolarWinds Network Performance Monitor · 8.9/10
  • Free trialonly SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor
  • Most featuresAppNeta · 4 of 4

SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor scores higher on our rubric for network performance monitoring software: 8.9 against 8.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #7.

SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor is the better fit for established teams needing deep self-hosted NPM. AppNeta is the better fit for synthetic and packet-level application monitoring.

  • SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor fits best

    Established teams needing deep self-hosted NPM

  • AppNeta fits best

    Synthetic and packet-level application monitoring

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor 8.9/10 Visit ↗ AppNeta 8.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.9 8.7
Ranking #5 in Network Performance Monitoring Software #7 in Network Performance Monitoring Software
Best for Established teams needing deep self-hosted NPM Synthetic and packet-level application monitoring
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request · 30-day trial Pricing on request
Free plan — Not checked yet
Free trial 30 days —
Deployment Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Features SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor 0/4 · AppNeta 4/4
Packet loss monitoring Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Jitter monitoring Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Path visualization Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Synthetic network tests Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Specs
Monitored devices Not checked yet Not checked yet
Deployment Not checked yet Hybrid
Data retention Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Maps devices, dependencies, topology, and hop-by-hop network paths
  • Correlates metrics with PerfStack and supports capacity forecasting
  • Monitors wired and wireless infrastructure with configurable alerts
  • Combines synthetic testing with passive traffic and packet monitoring
  • Measures packet loss, jitter, latency, and hop-by-hop network paths
  • Supports Selenium tests, packet capture, flow visibility, and API integration
Cons
  • Published starting price is $2,829
  • No free plan is available
  • Self-hosted deployment requires internal platform ownership
  • Pricing requires a contact-sales process
  • Conditional Freemium instances are limited to eligible DX NetOps subscribers
  • Its broad monitoring scope may exceed the needs of teams seeking a narrow tool
Our verdict

SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor is self-hosted network monitoring software for IT teams managing multi-vendor environments. It automatically discovers routers, switches, firewalls, wireless controllers, access points, and other…

Read the review →

AppNeta is Broadcom’s network performance monitoring software for network operations, cloud operations, and IT teams managing distributed environments. It combines active synthetic testing with passive traffic analysis across offices,…

Read the review →
  1. SolarWinds Network Performance MonitorNetwork Performance Monitoring Software 8.9Pricing on request · 30-day trial
  2. AppNetaNetwork Performance Monitoring Software 8.7Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor — where it wins

    • Maps devices, dependencies, topology, and hop-by-hop network paths
    • Correlates metrics with PerfStack and supports capacity forecasting
    • Monitors wired and wireless infrastructure with configurable alerts

    Where it doesn't

    • Published starting price is $2,829
    • No free plan is available
    • Self-hosted deployment requires internal platform ownership
  • AppNeta — where it wins

    • Combines synthetic testing with passive traffic and packet monitoring
    • Measures packet loss, jitter, latency, and hop-by-hop network paths
    • Supports Selenium tests, packet capture, flow visibility, and API integration

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires a contact-sales process
    • Conditional Freemium instances are limited to eligible DX NetOps subscribers
    • Its broad monitoring scope may exceed the needs of teams seeking a narrow tool
  • SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor8.9/10 · Pricing on request · 30-day trial

    Deep multi-vendor network monitoring for established teams that can support self-hosted software.

    Visit SolarWindsFull verdict →
  • AppNeta8.7/10 · Pricing on request

    A broad monitoring platform for synthetic tests, packet analysis, and application paths.

    Visit BroadcomFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update