Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · API Clients

SoapUI vs Hurl

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 2 checks side by side
Higher score SoapUI #2 in API Clients 9.2/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 1 of 6 features Visit SoapUI
Hurl #8 in API Clients 8.3/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 1 of 6 features Visit Hurl

SoapUI leads on 0 checks, Hurl on 0, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreSoapUI · 9.2/10
  • Free planboth

SoapUI scores higher on our rubric for api clients: 9.2 against 8.3 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #8.

SoapUI is the better fit for mature SOAP and API testing teams. Hurl is the better fit for text-based CI API testing.

  • SoapUI fits best

    Mature SOAP and API testing teams

  • Hurl fits best

    Text-based CI API testing

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature SoapUI 9.2/10 Visit ↗ Hurl 8.3/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.2 8.3
Ranking #2 in API Clients #8 in API Clients
Best for Mature SOAP and API testing teams Text-based CI API testing
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Desktop Self-hosted
Platforms Windows, macOS, Linux Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Community, Docs Docs, Community
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features SoapUI 1/6 · Hurl 1/6
GraphQL support ✓ ✓
gRPC support Not checked yet Not checked yet
WebSocket support Not checked yet Not checked yet
Automated test runs Not checked yet Not checked yet
API documentation Not checked yet Not checked yet
Team workspaces Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Available platforms Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Free, open-source testing across REST, SOAP, and GraphQL
  • Covers functional, regression, performance, and load testing
  • Runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux with command-line execution
  • Chains requests and captures response values for later steps
  • Validates REST, SOAP, GraphQL, JSON, XML, and HTML responses
  • Creates text, JUnit, TAP, and HTML reports for CI/CD
Cons
  • More testing-focused than broad, general-purpose API clients
  • Enterprise capabilities are provided through the separate ReadyAPI product
  • Desktop-focused workflows may not suit teams seeking a browser-based client
  • Command-line workflow is narrower than full graphical API clients
  • Best suited to teams comfortable maintaining plain-text test files
  • Focused on HTTP testing rather than broader API client workflows
Our verdict

SoapUI is an open-source desktop API testing tool from SmartBear for developers and testers working with REST, SOAP, HTTP, and GraphQL services. It is particularly suited to teams that need structured functional, regression,…

Read the review →

Hurl is an open-source command-line tool for developers and DevOps teams who define HTTP requests and tests in plain-text Hurl files. It runs on Linux, macOS, and Windows, and is distributed as a single Rust binary powered by libcurl. The…

Read the review →
  1. SoapUIAPI Clients 9.2Free plan
  2. HurlAPI Clients 8.3Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • SoapUI — where it wins

    • Free, open-source testing across REST, SOAP, and GraphQL
    • Covers functional, regression, performance, and load testing
    • Runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux with command-line execution

    Where it doesn't

    • More testing-focused than broad, general-purpose API clients
    • Enterprise capabilities are provided through the separate ReadyAPI product
    • Desktop-focused workflows may not suit teams seeking a browser-based client
  • Hurl — where it wins

    • Chains requests and captures response values for later steps
    • Validates REST, SOAP, GraphQL, JSON, XML, and HTML responses
    • Creates text, JUnit, TAP, and HTML reports for CI/CD

    Where it doesn't

    • Command-line workflow is narrower than full graphical API clients
    • Best suited to teams comfortable maintaining plain-text test files
    • Focused on HTTP testing rather than broader API client workflows

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update