Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Regression Testing Software

SoapUI vs BrowserStack Automate

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Higher score SoapUI #6 in Regression Testing Software 6.8/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 1 features Visit SoapUI
BrowserStack Automate #7 in Regression Testing Software 6.7/10 From $59/mo (annual) ✓ 0 of 1 features Visit BrowserStack

SoapUI leads on 1 check, BrowserStack Automate on 0, and 0 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreSoapUI · 6.8/10
  • Free planonly SoapUI

SoapUI scores higher on our rubric for regression testing software: 6.8 against 6.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #6 and #7.

SoapUI offers free plan; BrowserStack Automate doesn't.

SoapUI is the better fit for teams maintaining REST and SOAP service regressions. BrowserStack Automate is the better fit for teams running code-based browser tests across real devices.

  • SoapUI fits best

    Teams maintaining REST and SOAP service regressions

  • BrowserStack Automate fits best

    Teams running code-based browser tests across real devices

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature SoapUI 6.8/10 Visit ↗ BrowserStack Automate 6.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 6.8 6.7
Ranking #6 in Regression Testing Software #7 in Regression Testing Software
Best for Teams maintaining REST and SOAP service regressions Teams running code-based browser tests across real devices
Pricing model Free Paid
Starting price Not published Not published
Free plan ✓ (best) —
Free trial — —
Deployment Desktop Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Windows, macOS, Linux Web
Support Community, Docs Docs
Integrations 9 integrations 58+ integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features SoapUI 0/1 · BrowserStack Automate 0/1
Parallel execution Not published Not published
Specs
Test types Not published Not published
Supported platforms Not published Not published
Test execution Not published Not published
Documented integrations Not published Not published
Test authoring Not published Code
Our review
Pros
  • Free, open-source coverage for REST, SOAP, and GraphQL APIs
  • Combines regression, functional, load testing, mocking, and contracts
  • Runs from the command line and integrates with CI and build tools
  • Runs Selenium, Playwright, Cypress, Puppeteer, and JavaScript tests
  • Tests real desktop and mobile browsers with parallel execution
  • Provides video, screenshots, console, network, framework, and CI logs
Cons
  • Desktop deployment limits it to Windows, macOS, and Linux workstations
  • Support is provided through community channels and documentation
  • Focused on API services rather than broad user-interface regression
  • No free plan; listed pricing is billed annually
  • Chrome plan covers Chrome rather than multiple browser engines
  • Visual testing is not included in Automate
Our verdict

SoapUI is a free, open-source desktop application for developers and testers maintaining REST, SOAP, and GraphQL services. It supports REST requests, SOAP/WSDL validation, GraphQL queries and mutations, assertions, functional and…

Read the review →

BrowserStack Automate is a cloud-based end-to-end testing platform for software development and QA teams that write browser tests in code. It runs Selenium, Playwright, Cypress, Puppeteer, and JavaScript tests across desktop and mobile…

Read the review →
  1. SoapUIRegression Testing Software 6.8Free plan
  2. BrowserStack AutomateRegression Testing Software 6.7From $59/mo (annual)

Strengths and trade-offs

  • SoapUI — where it wins

    • Free, open-source coverage for REST, SOAP, and GraphQL APIs
    • Combines regression, functional, load testing, mocking, and contracts
    • Runs from the command line and integrates with CI and build tools

    Where it doesn't

    • Desktop deployment limits it to Windows, macOS, and Linux workstations
    • Support is provided through community channels and documentation
    • Focused on API services rather than broad user-interface regression

  • BrowserStack Automate — where it wins

    • Runs Selenium, Playwright, Cypress, Puppeteer, and JavaScript tests
    • Tests real desktop and mobile browsers with parallel execution
    • Provides video, screenshots, console, network, framework, and CI logs

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan; listed pricing is billed annually
    • Chrome plan covers Chrome rather than multiple browser engines
    • Visual testing is not included in Automate
  • SoapUI6.8/10 · Free plan

    A free desktop suite for functional and regression coverage across REST, SOAP, and GraphQL APIs.

    Visit SoapUIFull verdict →
  • BrowserStack Automate6.7/10 · From $59/mo (annual)

    Code-based browser testing across real desktop and mobile environments, with CI evidence.

    Visit BrowserStackFull verdict →

More comparisons

All regression testing software comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026

Last updated · How we research and update