Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Regression Testing Software

OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) vs SoapUI

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Higher score OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) #5 in Regression Testing Software 7.1/10 Pricing on request ✓ 0 of 1 features Visit OpenText
SoapUI #6 in Regression Testing Software 6.8/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 1 features Visit SoapUI

OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) leads on 0 checks, SoapUI on 1, and 0 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreOpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) · 7.1/10
  • Free planonly SoapUI

OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) scores higher on our rubric for regression testing software: 7.1 against 6.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #6.

SoapUI offers free plan; OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) doesn't.

OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) is the better fit for enterprises with legacy and packaged-app test needs. SoapUI is the better fit for teams maintaining REST and SOAP service regressions.

  • OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) fits best

    Enterprises with legacy and packaged-app test needs

  • SoapUI fits best

    Teams maintaining REST and SOAP service regressions

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) 7.1/10 Visit ↗ SoapUI 6.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.1 6.8
Ranking #5 in Regression Testing Software #6 in Regression Testing Software
Best for Enterprises with legacy and packaged-app test needs Teams maintaining REST and SOAP service regressions
Pricing model Paid Free
Starting price Not published Not published
Free plan — ✓ (best)
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted, Desktop Desktop
Platforms Windows, Linux Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Phone, Community, Docs, Tickets Community, Docs
Integrations 6 integrations 9 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) 0/1 · SoapUI 0/1
Parallel execution Not published Not published
Specs
Test types Not published Not published
Supported platforms Not published Not published
Test execution Not published Not published
Documented integrations Not published Not published
Test authoring Code Not published
Our review
Pros
  • Covers web, desktop, mobile, API, mainframe, and packaged applications.
  • Supports parallel, distributed, and Docker-based test execution.
  • Combines AI object recognition with visual regression detection.
  • Free, open-source coverage for REST, SOAP, and GraphQL APIs
  • Combines regression, functional, load testing, mocking, and contracts
  • Runs from the command line and integrates with CI and build tools
Cons
  • Public pricing is unavailable; purchasing goes through sales.
  • No free plan; evaluation is limited to a 30-day trial.
  • Positioned for mid-market and enterprise teams, not small teams.
  • Desktop deployment limits it to Windows, macOS, and Linux workstations
  • Support is provided through community channels and documentation
  • Focused on API services rather than broad user-interface regression
Our verdict

For QA and development teams working across complex enterprise environments, OpenText Functional Testing provides automated functional and end-to-end testing. Its scope spans web, desktop, mobile, API, mainframe, composite, SAP, and…

Read the review →

SoapUI is a free, open-source desktop application for developers and testers maintaining REST, SOAP, and GraphQL services. It supports REST requests, SOAP/WSDL validation, GraphQL queries and mutations, assertions, functional and…

Read the review →
  1. OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One)Regression Testing Software 7.1Pricing on request
  2. SoapUIRegression Testing Software 6.8Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) — where it wins

    • Covers web, desktop, mobile, API, mainframe, and packaged applications.
    • Supports parallel, distributed, and Docker-based test execution.
    • Combines AI object recognition with visual regression detection.

    Where it doesn't

    • Public pricing is unavailable; purchasing goes through sales.
    • No free plan; evaluation is limited to a 30-day trial.
    • Positioned for mid-market and enterprise teams, not small teams.
  • SoapUI — where it wins

    • Free, open-source coverage for REST, SOAP, and GraphQL APIs
    • Combines regression, functional, load testing, mocking, and contracts
    • Runs from the command line and integrates with CI and build tools

    Where it doesn't

    • Desktop deployment limits it to Windows, macOS, and Linux workstations
    • Support is provided through community channels and documentation
    • Focused on API services rather than broad user-interface regression
  • OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One)7.1/10 · Pricing on request

    Broad enterprise test coverage, but pricing requires a sales conversation.

    Visit OpenTextFull verdict →
  • SoapUI6.8/10 · Free plan

    A free desktop suite for functional and regression coverage across REST, SOAP, and GraphQL APIs.

    Visit SoapUIFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026

Last updated · How we research and update