Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Regression Testing Software

Cypress vs OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One)

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Higher score Cypress #3 in Regression Testing Software 7.9/10 Free plan · paid from $67/mo (annual) · 30-day trial Free plan✓ 0 of 1 features Visit Cypress
OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) #5 in Regression Testing Software 7.1/10 Pricing on request ✓ 0 of 1 features Visit OpenText

Cypress leads on 1 check, OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) on 0, and 0 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreCypress · 7.9/10
  • Free planonly Cypress

Cypress scores higher on our rubric for regression testing software: 7.9 against 7.1 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #5.

Cypress offers free plan; OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) doesn't.

Cypress is the better fit for javaScript teams testing web applications. OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) is the better fit for enterprises with legacy and packaged-app test needs.

  • Cypress fits best

    JavaScript teams testing web applications

  • OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) fits best

    Enterprises with legacy and packaged-app test needs

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Cypress 7.9/10 Visit ↗ OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) 7.1/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.9 7.1
Ranking #3 in Regression Testing Software #5 in Regression Testing Software
Best for JavaScript teams testing web applications Enterprises with legacy and packaged-app test needs
Pricing model Free plan + paid Paid
Starting price Not published Not published
Free plan ✓ (best) —
Free trial — —
Free trial length 30 days 30 days
Deployment Cloud, Desktop Self-hosted, Desktop
Platforms Web, Windows, macOS, Linux Windows, Linux
Support Email, Community, Docs Phone, Community, Docs, Tickets
Integrations 6 integrations 6 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Cypress 0/1 · OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) 0/1
Parallel execution Not published Not published
Specs
Test types Not published Not published
Supported platforms Not published Not published
Test execution Not published Not published
Documented integrations Not published Not published
Test authoring Code Code
Our review
Pros
  • Tests end-to-end flows and components in real browsers
  • Supports Chrome-family browsers, Firefox, and WebKit
  • Cloud adds replay, analytics, and CI parallelization
  • Covers web, desktop, mobile, API, mainframe, and packaged applications.
  • Supports parallel, distributed, and Docker-based test execution.
  • Combines AI object recognition with visual regression detection.
Cons
  • Test authoring centers on JavaScript and TypeScript
  • Visual comparison depends on plugins or integrations
  • Cloud's paid tiers are priced annually
  • Public pricing is unavailable; purchasing goes through sales.
  • No free plan; evaluation is limited to a 30-day trial.
  • Positioned for mid-market and enterprise teams, not small teams.
Our verdict

Cypress combines an open-source desktop app for end-to-end and component testing with Cypress Cloud for recorded results, analytics, replay, and CI workflows. It is aimed at teams building web applications, particularly those authoring…

Read the review →

For QA and development teams working across complex enterprise environments, OpenText Functional Testing provides automated functional and end-to-end testing. Its scope spans web, desktop, mobile, API, mainframe, composite, SAP, and…

Read the review →
  1. CypressRegression Testing Software 7.9Free plan · paid from $67/mo (annual) · 30-day trial
  2. OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One)Regression Testing Software 7.1Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Cypress — where it wins

    • Tests end-to-end flows and components in real browsers
    • Supports Chrome-family browsers, Firefox, and WebKit
    • Cloud adds replay, analytics, and CI parallelization

    Where it doesn't

    • Test authoring centers on JavaScript and TypeScript
    • Visual comparison depends on plugins or integrations
    • Cloud's paid tiers are priced annually

  • OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) — where it wins

    • Covers web, desktop, mobile, API, mainframe, and packaged applications.
    • Supports parallel, distributed, and Docker-based test execution.
    • Combines AI object recognition with visual regression detection.

    Where it doesn't

    • Public pricing is unavailable; purchasing goes through sales.
    • No free plan; evaluation is limited to a 30-day trial.
    • Positioned for mid-market and enterprise teams, not small teams.
  • Cypress7.9/10 · Free plan · paid from $67/mo (annual) · 30-day trial

    Open-source browser tests pair with Cypress Cloud for replay, analytics, and CI parallelization.

    Visit CypressFull verdict →
  • OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One)7.1/10 · Pricing on request

    Broad enterprise test coverage, but pricing requires a sales conversation.

    Visit OpenTextFull verdict →

More comparisons

All regression testing software comparisons → · Full ranking →

Guides on regression testing software

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026

Last updated · How we research and update