Head-to-head · Call for Papers Software
SimplyConf vs HotCRP
SimplyConf leads on 0 checks, HotCRP on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreSimplyConf · 7.9/10
- Free planboth
SimplyConf scores higher on our rubric for call for papers software: 7.9 against 7.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #6.
On review stages, SimplyConf gives you Custom where HotCRP offers Multi_stage.
SimplyConf is the better fit for self-hosted conferences needing modular pricing. HotCRP is the better fit for technical conferences needing open-source review depth.
- SimplyConf fits best
Self-hosted conferences needing modular pricing
- HotCRP fits best
Technical conferences needing open-source review depth
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | SimplyConf 7.9/10 Visit ↗ | HotCRP 7.6/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 7.9 | 7.6 |
| Ranking | #4 in Call for Papers Software | #6 in Call for Papers Software |
| Best for | Self-hosted conferences needing modular pricing | Technical conferences needing open-source review depth |
| Pricing model | Free plan + paid | Free plan + paid |
| Starting price | $29/yr | Not published |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, Self-hosted | Cloud, Self-hosted |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Support | Email, Docs | Email, Docs |
| Integrations | 2 integrations | 2 integrations |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features SimplyConf 2/2 · HotCRP 2/2 | ||
| Blind review | ✓ | ✓ |
| Schedule builder | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Submission types | Mixed | Mixed |
| Review stages | Custom | Multi_stage |
| Submission limit | Not published | Not published |
| Reviewer limit | Not published | Not published |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | SimplyConf is a WordPress-based conference management product for academic conferences, universities, program committees, and organizations running one or multiple events. Its free, open-source core covers events, abstract submissions, and… Read the review → |
HotCRP manages submission, peer-review, and publication workflows for academic conferences, workshops, and journals. It is designed for chairs and program committees that need detailed control over paper registration, submissions,… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
SimplyConf — where it wins
- Free, open-source core with web and self-hosted deployment
- Supports blind review, reviewer assignment, and review progress tracking
- Adds Stripe payments, scheduling, email, and export workflows
Where it doesn't
- Reviews, emails, payments, schedules, and exports require paid add-ons
- WordPress is central to the product's ecosystem fit
- Managed hosting and self-hosting involve different deployment choices
HotCRP — where it wins
- Multiple review rounds, anonymous review, rebuttals, and discussions
- Conflict controls, track permissions, and flexible reviewer assignment
- Hosted or self-hosted deployment with a REST API
Where it doesn't
- Independent plan support is limited to bug fixes
- Classroom plan provides no support
- Per-submission pricing may be less predictable for large events
- SimplyConf7.9/10 · Free plan · paid from $29/yr
A flexible WordPress-based choice for conferences that need self-hosting and add-on control.
Visit SimplyConfFull verdict → - HotCRP7.6/10 · Free plan · paid from $7.50
A deep academic review workflow with flexible hosting and a free plan.
Visit HotCRPFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Microsoft CMT vs SimplyConf
- Microsoft CMT vs HotCRP
- EasyChair vs SimplyConf
- EasyChair vs HotCRP
- Airballoon vs SimplyConf
- Airballoon vs HotCRP
- SimplyConf vs MeetingHand Abstract Management
- SimplyConf vs OpenReview
All call for papers software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026
Last updated · How we research and update





