Head-to-head · Call for Papers Software
Airballoon vs HotCRP
Airballoon leads on 0 checks, HotCRP on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreAirballoon · 8.2/10
- Free planboth
Airballoon scores higher on our rubric for call for papers software: 8.2 against 7.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #6.
On review stages, Airballoon gives you Custom where HotCRP offers Multi_stage.
Airballoon is the better fit for end-to-end conferences with attendee operations. HotCRP is the better fit for technical conferences needing open-source review depth.
- Airballoon fits best
End-to-end conferences with attendee operations
- HotCRP fits best
Technical conferences needing open-source review depth
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Airballoon 8.2/10 Visit ↗ | HotCRP 7.6/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 8.2 | 7.6 |
| Ranking | #3 in Call for Papers Software | #6 in Call for Papers Software |
| Best for | End-to-end conferences with attendee operations | Technical conferences needing open-source review depth |
| Pricing model | Free plan + paid | Free plan + paid |
| Starting price | Not published | Not published |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, Mobile | Cloud, Self-hosted |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Support | Email, Docs | Email, Docs |
| Integrations | 9 integrations | 2 integrations |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Airballoon 2/2 · HotCRP 2/2 | ||
| Blind review | ✓ | ✓ |
| Schedule builder | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Submission types | Mixed | Mixed |
| Review stages | Custom | Multi_stage |
| Submission limit | Not published | Not published |
| Reviewer limit | Not published | Not published |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Airballoon is a web-based conference-management platform from Lumvex Labs LLC for academic conferences and workshops. It covers the conference lifecycle from CFP publication and paper, abstract, poster, and proposal submissions through… Read the review → |
HotCRP manages submission, peer-review, and publication workflows for academic conferences, workshops, and journals. It is designed for chairs and program committees that need detailed control over paper registration, submissions,… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Airballoon — where it wins
- Supports paper, abstract, poster, and proposal submissions
- Combines blind review, committee management, and custom review stages
- Extends into websites, schedules, registration, networking, and payments
Where it doesn't
- Registration can incur transaction fees
- Presentation storage can incur storage fees
- Its broad event scope may exceed the needs of CFP-only teams
HotCRP — where it wins
- Multiple review rounds, anonymous review, rebuttals, and discussions
- Conflict controls, track permissions, and flexible reviewer assignment
- Hosted or self-hosted deployment with a REST API
Where it doesn't
- Independent plan support is limited to bug fixes
- Classroom plan provides no support
- Per-submission pricing may be less predictable for large events
- Airballoon8.2/10 · Free plan
A broad web-based conference system covering CFPs, review, event operations, and attendee engagement.
Visit AirballoonFull verdict → - HotCRP7.6/10 · Free plan · paid from $7.50
A deep academic review workflow with flexible hosting and a free plan.
Visit HotCRPFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Microsoft CMT vs Airballoon
- Microsoft CMT vs HotCRP
- EasyChair vs Airballoon
- EasyChair vs HotCRP
- Airballoon vs SimplyConf
- Airballoon vs MeetingHand Abstract Management
- Airballoon vs OpenReview
- Airballoon vs Oxford Abstracts
All call for papers software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026
Last updated · How we research and update






