Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Colony Survival Server Hosting

Shockbyte vs Nodecraft

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score Shockbyte #3 in Colony Survival Server Hosting 7.8/10 Paid plans · price varies by game ✓ 1 of 3 features Visit Shockbyte
Nodecraft #5 in Colony Survival Server Hosting 7.4/10 Paid plans · price varies by game ✓ 3 of 3 features Visit Nodecraft

Shockbyte leads on 0 checks, Nodecraft on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreShockbyte · 7.8/10
  • Most featuresNodecraft · 3 of 3

Shockbyte scores higher on our rubric for colony survival server hosting: 7.8 against 7.4 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #5.

Shockbyte is the better fit for small groups needing established game hosting. Nodecraft is the better fit for colony Survival players seeking straightforward hosting.

  • Shockbyte fits best

    Small groups needing established game hosting

  • Nodecraft fits best

    Colony Survival players seeking straightforward hosting

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Shockbyte 7.8/10 Visit ↗ Nodecraft 7.4/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.8 7.4
Ranking #3 in Colony Survival Server Hosting #5 in Colony Survival Server Hosting
Best for Small groups needing established game hosting Colony Survival players seeking straightforward hosting
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Paid plans · price varies by game Paid plans · price varies by game
Free plan — —
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Support Tickets, Docs, Community · 24/7 Tickets, Docs
Built for Solo, Small business Solo, Small business, Mid-market
Features Shockbyte 1/3 · Nodecraft 3/3
Mod support Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Automatic backups Not checked yet ✓ (best)
DDoS protection ✓ ✓
Specs
Server locations 13 Not checked yet
Control access Not checked yet Not checked yet
Player slots Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Instant setup with automatic backups and DDoS protection
  • Full file access and mod support for custom worlds
  • Webber and Maxwell plans support caves shard configuration
  • Colony Survival hosting with browser-based server management
  • Console, FTP, and mod installation support
  • Automated backups, DDoS protection, and multiple locations
Cons
  • No free plan is available
  • Wilson does not include caves shard support
  • Mods require panel-based file setup rather than one-click installation
  • Management is delivered through the web platform
  • No free plan is offered
  • Support channels are limited to tickets and documentation
Our verdict

Shockbyte provides hosted dedicated servers for Don't Starve Together through cloud deployment and a web control panel. It is aimed at solo players and small groups that want a persistent private or public multiplayer world without…

Read the review →

Nodecraft provides hosted game servers managed through a web-based control panel, with explicit support for Colony Survival. It is designed for individual players, gaming groups, and communities that want managed cloud infrastructure…

Read the review →
  1. ShockbyteColony Survival Server Hosting 7.8Paid plans · price varies by game
  2. NodecraftColony Survival Server Hosting 7.4Paid plans · price varies by game

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Shockbyte — where it wins

    • Instant setup with automatic backups and DDoS protection
    • Full file access and mod support for custom worlds
    • Webber and Maxwell plans support caves shard configuration

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan is available
    • Wilson does not include caves shard support
    • Mods require panel-based file setup rather than one-click installation
  • Nodecraft — where it wins

    • Colony Survival hosting with browser-based server management
    • Console, FTP, and mod installation support
    • Automated backups, DDoS protection, and multiple locations

    Where it doesn't

    • Management is delivered through the web platform
    • No free plan is offered
    • Support channels are limited to tickets and documentation
  • Shockbyte7.8/10 · Paid plans · price varies by game

    A straightforward hosted Don't Starve Together server for small groups and private worlds.

    Visit ShockbyteFull verdict →
  • Nodecraft7.4/10 · Paid plans · price varies by game

    A managed Colony Survival host with practical controls, backups, and mod support.

    Visit NodecraftFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update