Head-to-head · Colony Survival Server Hosting
GTXGaming vs Shockbyte
GTXGaming leads on 0 checks, Shockbyte on 0, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreGTXGaming · 8.4/10
GTXGaming scores higher on our rubric for colony survival server hosting: 8.4 against 7.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #3.
GTXGaming is the better fit for teams needing powerful, managed dedicated infrastructure. Shockbyte is the better fit for small groups needing established game hosting.
- GTXGaming fits best
Teams needing powerful, managed dedicated infrastructure
- Shockbyte fits best
Small groups needing established game hosting
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | GTXGaming 8.4/10 Visit ↗ | Shockbyte 7.8/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 8.4 | 7.8 |
| Ranking | #1 in Colony Survival Server Hosting | #3 in Colony Survival Server Hosting |
| Best for | Teams needing powerful, managed dedicated infrastructure | Small groups needing established game hosting |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Starting price | Not published | Not published |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, Linux | Web |
| Support | Tickets, Community, Docs · 24/7 | Tickets, Docs, Community · 24/7 |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Solo, Small business |
| Features GTXGaming 1/3 · Shockbyte 1/3 | ||
| Mod support | Not published | Not published |
| Automatic backups | Not published | Not published |
| DDoS protection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Server locations | Not published | 13 |
| Control access | Not published | Not published |
| Player slots | Not published | Not published |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | GTXGaming provides dedicated physical servers for game hosting, websites, applications, and bare-metal workloads. It suits small teams through enterprise organizations that need dedicated CPU, memory, NVMe storage, and operating-system… Read the review → |
Shockbyte provides hosted dedicated servers for Don't Starve Together through cloud deployment and a web control panel. It is aimed at solo players and small groups that want a persistent private or public multiplayer world without… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
GTXGaming — where it wins
- Dedicated Ryzen, EPYC, and Intel servers with DDR5 and NVMe storage
- Enterprise DDoS protection, daily offsite backups, and 24/7 human support
- Windows/Linux access, root SSH or remote desktop, and 200+ game templates
Where it doesn't
- No free plan; entry pricing starts at £99 per month
- Servers are listed as unmanaged infrastructure
- Colony Survival-specific support is not specifically verified
Shockbyte — where it wins
- Instant setup with automatic backups and DDoS protection
- Full file access and mod support for custom worlds
- Webber and Maxwell plans support caves shard configuration
Where it doesn't
- No free plan is available
- Wilson does not include caves shard support
- Mods require panel-based file setup rather than one-click installation
- GTXGaming8.4/10 · From £99/mo
Powerful managed infrastructure with broad server choices, but it requires a paid dedicated setup.
Visit GTXGamingFull verdict → - Shockbyte7.8/10 · Paid plans · price varies by game
A straightforward hosted Don't Starve Together server for small groups and private worlds.
Visit ShockbyteFull verdict →
More comparisons
- GTXGaming vs ScalaCube
- GTXGaming vs Citadel Servers
- GTXGaming vs Nodecraft
- GTXGaming vs Survival Servers
- GTXGaming vs Pingperfect
- ScalaCube vs Shockbyte
- Shockbyte vs Citadel Servers
- Shockbyte vs Nodecraft
All colony survival server hosting comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update






