Head-to-head · Pre-employment Testing
SHL vs TestGorilla
SHL leads on 0 checks, TestGorilla on 1, and 0 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreSHL · 7.7/10
- Free planonly TestGorilla
SHL scores higher on our rubric for pre-employment testing: 7.7 against 7.4 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #4.
TestGorilla offers free plan; SHL doesn't publish it.
SHL is the better fit for large-scale mobile cognitive and skills testing. TestGorilla is the better fit for SMBs wanting broad testing and a free plan.
- SHL fits best
Large-scale mobile cognitive and skills testing
- TestGorilla fits best
SMBs wanting broad testing and a free plan
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | SHL 7.7/10 Visit ↗ | TestGorilla 7.4/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 7.7 | 7.4 |
| Ranking | #3 in Pre-employment Testing | #4 in Pre-employment Testing |
| Best for | Large-scale mobile cognitive and skills testing | SMBs wanting broad testing and a free plan |
| Pricing model | Paid | Free plan + paid |
| Starting price | Not published | Not published |
| Free plan | Not published | ✓ (best) |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, Mobile | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web |
| Support | Email, Tickets, Docs | Email, Live chat, Docs |
| Built for | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features SHL 0/3 · TestGorilla 0/3 | ||
| ATS integrations | Not published | Not published |
| Anti-cheating controls | Not published | Not published |
| Custom questions | Not published | Not published |
| Specs | ||
| Assessment formats | Not published | Not published |
| Candidate invites | Not published | Not published |
| Report analytics | Not published | Not published |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | SHL provides online assessments and reporting for organizations evaluating candidates and employees. Its portfolio spans cognitive ability, personality, behavioral, skills and job-focused assessments, so it can support more than one kind… Read the review → |
TestGorilla is a cloud-based assessment and sourcing platform for employers and recruiting teams. It suits organizations that want to evaluate candidates across more than a single skills category, with tests for cognitive ability,… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
SHL — where it wins
- Covers cognitive, personality, behavioral, skills and job-focused assessments
- Includes project configuration, candidate scheduling and bulk data upload
- Offers real-time reports plus automated and live proctoring
Where it doesn't
- Paid offering may require sign-in to view pricing
- Broad assessment coverage may exceed simpler hiring workflows
- Candidate management and proctoring add configuration choices
TestGorilla — where it wins
- Free plan includes 10 monthly credits and five essential skills tests.
- Library covers skills, cognitive, situational, personality, language and coding tests.
- Offers AI interviews, monitoring, reporting exports and 15 ATS integrations.
Where it doesn't
- Free plan has one full access seat and a limited set of five essential tests.
- Core and Plus require annual billing; monthly pricing is not offered.
- Monitoring features such as webcam snapshots may not suit every candidate experience.
- SHL7.7/10 · Paid
Broad candidate assessment options with project controls, reporting and proctoring.
Visit SHLFull verdict → - TestGorilla7.4/10 · Free plan · paid from $142/mo (annual)
Broad hiring assessments with a free plan and paid options from $142 per month, billed annually.
Visit TestGorillaFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Aon Assessment Solutions vs TestGorilla
- SHL vs iMocha
- SHL vs Bryq
- SHL vs Cappfinity
- TestGorilla vs Cappfinity
All pre-employment testing comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026
Last updated · How we research and update





