Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · DevSecOps Platforms

Semgrep AppSec Platform vs Mend.io

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 7 checks side by side
Higher score Semgrep AppSec Platform #2 in DevSecOps Platforms 9.2/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 5 of 6 features Visit Semgrep
Mend.io #3 in DevSecOps Platforms 9.0/10 Pricing on request ✓ 6 of 6 features Visit Mend.io

Semgrep AppSec Platform leads on 0 checks, Mend.io on 0, and 7 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 7 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreSemgrep AppSec Platform · 9.2/10
  • Free planonly Semgrep AppSec Platform
  • Most featuresMend.io · 6 of 6

Semgrep AppSec Platform scores higher on our rubric for devsecops platforms: 9.2 against 9.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #3.

On deployment model, Mend.io gives you Hybrid where Semgrep AppSec Platform offers Cloud.

Semgrep AppSec Platform is the better fit for teams wanting affordable code-centric AppSec. Mend.io is the better fit for mature enterprises needing comprehensive AppSec.

  • Semgrep AppSec Platform fits best

    Teams wanting affordable code-centric AppSec

  • Mend.io fits best

    Mature enterprises needing comprehensive AppSec

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Semgrep AppSec Platform 9.2/10 Visit ↗ Mend.io 9.0/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.2 9.0
Ranking #2 in DevSecOps Platforms #3 in DevSecOps Platforms
Best for Teams wanting affordable code-centric AppSec Mature enterprises needing comprehensive AppSec
Pricing model Free plan + paid Paid
Starting price $15/user/mo $250/user/yr
Free plan ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Self-hosted, Browser extension
Platforms Web Web
Support Email, Tickets, Community, Docs Docs
Compliance SOC 2, GDPR, SSO/SAML ISO 27001, SOC 2, GDPR, SSO/SAML
Integrations 15 integrations 12 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Semgrep AppSec Platform 5/6 · Mend.io 6/6
IaC scanning ✓ ✓
Container scanning ✓ ✓
Policy as code ✓ ✓
Remediation workflows ✓ ✓
SBOM management ✓ ✓
Compliance reporting Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Specs
Deployment model Cloud Hybrid
Our review
Pros
  • Free edition covers code and supply chain security for up to 10 repositories
  • SAST, SCA, secrets detection, SBOM export, and policy enforcement in one platform
  • Integrates with major source-control, CI/CD, IDE, ticketing, and identity tools
  • Combines SAST, SCA, container, IaC, policy, SBOM, and AI security.
  • Supports web, API, and self-hosted deployment models.
  • Integrates with GitHub, GitLab, Jira, Jenkins, ServiceNow, and more.
Cons
  • Cloud-only deployment may not fit teams requiring fully self-hosted operations
  • Paid capabilities are split across separate Code, Supply Chain, and Secrets plans
  • Enterprise features require a separate plan without published pricing
  • Published plan prices use annual per-developer billing.
  • The three plans separate AppSec, AI security, and Renovate capabilities.
  • Its broad feature set may require deliberate policy and workflow design.
Our verdict

Semgrep AppSec Platform is a cloud-based application security platform for development and security teams that need to scan source code, open-source dependencies, and hardcoded secrets. Its scope combines SAST with cross-file and…

Read the review →

Mend.io is an application security platform for development and security teams. It brings together static application security testing, software composition analysis, container scanning, infrastructure-as-code scanning, dependency updates,…

Read the review →
  1. Semgrep AppSec PlatformDevSecOps Platforms 9.2Free plan
  2. Mend.ioDevSecOps Platforms 9.0Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Semgrep AppSec Platform — where it wins

    • Free edition covers code and supply chain security for up to 10 repositories
    • SAST, SCA, secrets detection, SBOM export, and policy enforcement in one platform
    • Integrates with major source-control, CI/CD, IDE, ticketing, and identity tools

    Where it doesn't

    • Cloud-only deployment may not fit teams requiring fully self-hosted operations
    • Paid capabilities are split across separate Code, Supply Chain, and Secrets plans
    • Enterprise features require a separate plan without published pricing
  • Mend.io — where it wins

    • Combines SAST, SCA, container, IaC, policy, SBOM, and AI security.
    • Supports web, API, and self-hosted deployment models.
    • Integrates with GitHub, GitLab, Jira, Jenkins, ServiceNow, and more.

    Where it doesn't

    • Published plan prices use annual per-developer billing.
    • The three plans separate AppSec, AI security, and Renovate capabilities.
    • Its broad feature set may require deliberate policy and workflow design.
  • Semgrep AppSec Platform9.2/10 · Free plan

    An affordable, developer-focused AppSec platform with broad integrations and cloud-only delivery.

    Visit SemgrepFull verdict →
  • Mend.io9.0/10 · Pricing on request

    Broad DevSecOps coverage for enterprises managing code, supply-chain, container, and AI risk.

    Visit Mend.ioFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update