Head-to-head · Security Ratings Software
SecurityScorecard Third-Party Risk Management vs RiskXchange
SecurityScorecard Third-Party Risk Management leads on 1 check, RiskXchange on 0, and 0 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreSecurityScorecard Third-Party Risk Management · 9.4/10
- Free planonly SecurityScorecard Third-Party Risk Management
- Free trialonly SecurityScorecard Third-Party Risk Management
SecurityScorecard Third-Party Risk Management scores higher on our rubric for security ratings software: 9.4 against 8.5 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #8.
SecurityScorecard Third-Party Risk Management offers free plan; RiskXchange doesn't.
SecurityScorecard Third-Party Risk Management is the better fit for teams needing broad third-party risk coverage. RiskXchange is the better fit for structured TPRM with clear enterprise workflows.
- SecurityScorecard Third-Party Risk Management fits best
Teams needing broad third-party risk coverage
- RiskXchange fits best
Structured TPRM with clear enterprise workflows
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | SecurityScorecard Third-Party Risk Management 9.4/10 Visit ↗ | RiskXchange 8.5/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.4 | 8.5 |
| Ranking | #1 in Security Ratings Software | #8 in Security Ratings Software |
| Best for | Teams needing broad third-party risk coverage | Structured TPRM with clear enterprise workflows |
| Pricing model | Free plan + paid | Paid |
| Starting price | — | £14,900/yr |
| Free plan | ✓ (best) | — |
| Free trial | 14 days | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Support | Tickets, Docs, Phone | |
| Compliance | SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS | ISO 27001, SSO/SAML |
| Integrations | 12 integrations | 13 integrations |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features SecurityScorecard Third-Party Risk Management 0/3 · RiskXchange 0/3 | ||
| Vendor monitoring | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Change alerts | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| API access | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Specs | ||
| Attack surface coverage | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Score refresh cadence | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Entity limit | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Risk frameworks | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | SecurityScorecard Third-Party Risk Management is a cloud-based platform for security, risk, compliance, and procurement teams managing third-party and fourth-party exposure. Its TITAN platform brings together security ratings, vendor… Read the review → |
RiskXchange is a third-party risk management platform for security, procurement, compliance and risk teams. It combines vendor questionnaires and evidence collection with outside-in security ratings on a 0–900 scale, continuous monitoring,… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
SecurityScorecard Third-Party Risk Management — where it wins
- Continuous monitoring covers both third- and fourth-party risk
- Combines ratings, questionnaires, evidence, workflows, and framework mapping
- REST API plus integrations with GRC, security, IT, and workflow systems
Where it doesn't
- Paid packages use sales-led pricing
- Advanced capabilities are reserved for higher tiers
- Broad functionality may exceed the needs of narrow assessment teams
RiskXchange — where it wins
- Hybrid assessments combine questionnaires, evidence and outside-in ratings.
- Continuous monitoring includes 0–900 scoring and dark-web correlation.
- Fourth-party mapping, APIs and workflow integrations support enterprise programs.
Where it doesn't
- There is no free plan; Essentials starts at £14,900 per year.
- The first two plans have vendor-volume limits, with a supplied limit of 50.
- SSO, custom integrations and premium support require the Enterprise tier.
- SecurityScorecard Third-Party Risk Management9.4/10 · Free plan · 14-day trial
Broad third-party risk coverage with free self-monitoring and scalable paid tiers.
Visit siteFull verdict → - RiskXchange8.5/10 · Paid
A structured TPRM platform combining hybrid assessments, monitoring and remediation workflows.
Visit RiskXchangeFull verdict →
More comparisons
- SecurityScorecard Third-Party Risk Management vs Bitsight Security Ratings
- SecurityScorecard Third-Party Risk Management vs Recorded Future Third-Party Risk
- SecurityScorecard Third-Party Risk Management vs ThreatWatch
- Bitsight Security Ratings vs RiskXchange
- Recorded Future Third-Party Risk vs RiskXchange
- Panorays vs RiskXchange
- Black Kite Third-Party Cyber Risk vs RiskXchange
- UpGuard vs RiskXchange
All security ratings software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update







