Head-to-head · Security Ratings Software
Recorded Future Third-Party Risk vs RiskXchange
Recorded Future Third-Party Risk leads on 0 checks, RiskXchange on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreRecorded Future Third-Party Risk · 9.0/10
- Most featuresRecorded Future Third-Party Risk · 3 of 3
Recorded Future Third-Party Risk scores higher on our rubric for security ratings software: 9.0 against 8.5 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #8.
Recorded Future Third-Party Risk is the better fit for threat-led enterprise third-party risk programs. RiskXchange is the better fit for structured TPRM with clear enterprise workflows.
- Recorded Future Third-Party Risk fits best
Threat-led enterprise third-party risk programs
- RiskXchange fits best
Structured TPRM with clear enterprise workflows
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Recorded Future Third-Party Risk 9.0/10 Visit ↗ | RiskXchange 8.5/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.0 | 8.5 |
| Ranking | #3 in Security Ratings Software | #8 in Security Ratings Software |
| Best for | Threat-led enterprise third-party risk programs | Structured TPRM with clear enterprise workflows |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Starting price | — | £14,900/yr |
| Free plan | Not checked yet | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Support | Docs | |
| Integrations | 1 integrations | 13 integrations |
| Built for | Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Recorded Future Third-Party Risk 3/3 · RiskXchange 0/3 | ||
| Vendor monitoring | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| Change alerts | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| API access | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| Specs | ||
| Attack surface coverage | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Score refresh cadence | Continuous | Not checked yet |
| Entity limit | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Risk frameworks | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Recorded Future Third-Party Risk is a web and API platform for security, GRC, and risk teams managing vendor and fourth-party exposure. It combines external security posture assessments with risk ratings and threat intelligence covering… Read the review → |
RiskXchange is a third-party risk management platform for security, procurement, compliance and risk teams. It combines vendor questionnaires and evidence collection with outside-in security ratings on a 0–900 scale, continuous monitoring,… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Recorded Future Third-Party Risk — where it wins
- Continuous monitoring of vendors and fourth parties
- Threat intelligence for breaches, ransomware, leaks, and exposed infrastructure
- Prioritization, action plans, and API access for risk workflows
Where it doesn't
- Pricing is customized by package, organization size, services, and capacity
- ServiceNow is the named integration
- Enterprise-wide coverage may exceed the needs of smaller teams
RiskXchange — where it wins
- Hybrid assessments combine questionnaires, evidence and outside-in ratings.
- Continuous monitoring includes 0–900 scoring and dark-web correlation.
- Fourth-party mapping, APIs and workflow integrations support enterprise programs.
Where it doesn't
- There is no free plan; Essentials starts at £14,900 per year.
- The first two plans have vendor-volume limits, with a supplied limit of 50.
- SSO, custom integrations and premium support require the Enterprise tier.
- Recorded Future Third-Party Risk9.0/10 · Pricing on request
A threat-led platform for continuous vendor risk monitoring, ratings, alerts, and remediation.
Visit siteFull verdict → - RiskXchange8.5/10 · Paid
A structured TPRM platform combining hybrid assessments, monitoring and remediation workflows.
Visit RiskXchangeFull verdict →
More comparisons
- SecurityScorecard Third-Party Risk Management vs Recorded Future Third-Party Risk
- SecurityScorecard Third-Party Risk Management vs RiskXchange
- Bitsight Security Ratings vs Recorded Future Third-Party Risk
- Bitsight Security Ratings vs RiskXchange
- Recorded Future Third-Party Risk vs Panorays
- Recorded Future Third-Party Risk vs Black Kite Third-Party Cyber Risk
- Recorded Future Third-Party Risk vs UpGuard
- Recorded Future Third-Party Risk vs ThreatWatch
All security ratings software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update







