Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Security Ratings Software

Recorded Future Third-Party Risk vs RiskXchange

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score Recorded Future Third-Party Risk #3 in Security Ratings Software 9.0/10 Pricing on request ✓ 3 of 3 features Visit site

Recorded Future Third-Party Risk leads on 0 checks, RiskXchange on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreRecorded Future Third-Party Risk · 9.0/10
  • Most featuresRecorded Future Third-Party Risk · 3 of 3

Recorded Future Third-Party Risk scores higher on our rubric for security ratings software: 9.0 against 8.5 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #8.

Recorded Future Third-Party Risk is the better fit for threat-led enterprise third-party risk programs. RiskXchange is the better fit for structured TPRM with clear enterprise workflows.

  • Recorded Future Third-Party Risk fits best

    Threat-led enterprise third-party risk programs

  • RiskXchange fits best

    Structured TPRM with clear enterprise workflows

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Recorded Future Third-Party Risk 9.0/10 Visit ↗ RiskXchange 8.5/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 8.5
Ranking #3 in Security Ratings Software #8 in Security Ratings Software
Best for Threat-led enterprise third-party risk programs Structured TPRM with clear enterprise workflows
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price — £14,900/yr
Free plan Not checked yet —
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Support Docs Email
Integrations 1 integrations 13 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Recorded Future Third-Party Risk 3/3 · RiskXchange 0/3
Vendor monitoring ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Change alerts ✓ (best) Not checked yet
API access ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Specs
Attack surface coverage Not checked yet Not checked yet
Score refresh cadence Continuous Not checked yet
Entity limit Not checked yet Not checked yet
Risk frameworks Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Continuous monitoring of vendors and fourth parties
  • Threat intelligence for breaches, ransomware, leaks, and exposed infrastructure
  • Prioritization, action plans, and API access for risk workflows
  • Hybrid assessments combine questionnaires, evidence and outside-in ratings.
  • Continuous monitoring includes 0–900 scoring and dark-web correlation.
  • Fourth-party mapping, APIs and workflow integrations support enterprise programs.
Cons
  • Pricing is customized by package, organization size, services, and capacity
  • ServiceNow is the named integration
  • Enterprise-wide coverage may exceed the needs of smaller teams
  • There is no free plan; Essentials starts at £14,900 per year.
  • The first two plans have vendor-volume limits, with a supplied limit of 50.
  • SSO, custom integrations and premium support require the Enterprise tier.
Our verdict

Recorded Future Third-Party Risk is a web and API platform for security, GRC, and risk teams managing vendor and fourth-party exposure. It combines external security posture assessments with risk ratings and threat intelligence covering…

Read the review →

RiskXchange is a third-party risk management platform for security, procurement, compliance and risk teams. It combines vendor questionnaires and evidence collection with outside-in security ratings on a 0–900 scale, continuous monitoring,…

Read the review →
  1. Recorded Future Third-Party RiskSecurity Ratings Software 9.0Pricing on request
  2. RiskXchangeSecurity Ratings Software 8.5Paid

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Recorded Future Third-Party Risk — where it wins

    • Continuous monitoring of vendors and fourth parties
    • Threat intelligence for breaches, ransomware, leaks, and exposed infrastructure
    • Prioritization, action plans, and API access for risk workflows

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing is customized by package, organization size, services, and capacity
    • ServiceNow is the named integration
    • Enterprise-wide coverage may exceed the needs of smaller teams
  • RiskXchange — where it wins

    • Hybrid assessments combine questionnaires, evidence and outside-in ratings.
    • Continuous monitoring includes 0–900 scoring and dark-web correlation.
    • Fourth-party mapping, APIs and workflow integrations support enterprise programs.

    Where it doesn't

    • There is no free plan; Essentials starts at £14,900 per year.
    • The first two plans have vendor-volume limits, with a supplied limit of 50.
    • SSO, custom integrations and premium support require the Enterprise tier.
  • Recorded Future Third-Party Risk9.0/10 · Pricing on request

    A threat-led platform for continuous vendor risk monitoring, ratings, alerts, and remediation.

    Visit siteFull verdict →
  • RiskXchange8.5/10 · Paid

    A structured TPRM platform combining hybrid assessments, monitoring and remediation workflows.

    Visit RiskXchangeFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update