Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Reading Comprehension Software

Scholastic Reading Measure vs MAP Growth Reading

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score Scholastic Reading Measure #2 in Reading Comprehension Software 8.2/10 Pricing on request ✓ 2 of 3 features Contact Scholastic
MAP Growth Reading #4 in Reading Comprehension Software 7.4/10 Pricing on request ✓ 3 of 3 features Visit NWEA

Scholastic Reading Measure leads on 0 checks, MAP Growth Reading on 1, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreScholastic Reading Measure · 8.2/10
  • Most featuresMAP Growth Reading · 3 of 3

Scholastic Reading Measure scores higher on our rubric for reading comprehension software: 8.2 against 7.4 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #4.

MAP Growth Reading offers standards alignment; Scholastic Reading Measure doesn't publish it.

Scholastic Reading Measure is the better fit for K–8 schools monitoring reading comprehension. MAP Growth Reading is the better fit for K–12 adaptive reading measurement.

  • Scholastic Reading Measure fits best

    K–8 schools monitoring reading comprehension

  • MAP Growth Reading fits best

    K–12 adaptive reading measurement

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Scholastic Reading Measure 8.2/10 Visit ↗ MAP Growth Reading 7.4/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.2 7.4
Ranking #2 in Reading Comprehension Software #4 in Reading Comprehension Software
Best for K–8 schools monitoring reading comprehension K–12 adaptive reading measurement
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Not published Not published
Free plan Not published Not published
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Browser extension
Platforms Web Web, iOS, Android, Chrome extension
Support Email, Phone, Docs Docs
Integrations 5 integrations 30+ integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Scholastic Reading Measure 2/3 · MAP Growth Reading 3/3
Adaptive difficulty ✓ ✓
Standards alignment Not published ✓ (best)
Class reporting ✓ ✓
Specs
Assessment type Formative Not published
Passage formats Not published Both
Grade range K–8 K–12
Our review
Pros
  • Adjusts passage difficulty in response to student answers
  • Generates Lexile measures to guide text matching
  • Records results and reports progress through Literacy Pro
  • Adapts item difficulty to each student across grades K–12
  • Measures foundational skills, comprehension, and vocabulary
  • Offers English and Spanish forms with accessibility features
Cons
  • Available as a component of Literacy Pro, not a standalone assessment
  • Requires sales contact for U.S. pricing
  • Web-based deployment only
  • Pricing requires contacting sales
  • Reading is included in a MAP Growth K–12 license, not sold separately
  • Listed support channels are documentation
Our verdict

For K–8 educators who need reading comprehension assessment tied to classroom reading, Scholastic Reading Measure offers computer-adaptive passages and questions. It adjusts passage difficulty according to student responses and generates…

Read the review →

For schools and districts measuring reading achievement across kindergarten through grade 12, MAP Growth Reading is NWEA’s computer-adaptive interim assessment. It adjusts item difficulty to each student and measures foundational skills…

Read the review →
  1. Scholastic Reading MeasureReading Comprehension Software 8.2Pricing on request
  2. MAP Growth ReadingReading Comprehension Software 7.4Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Scholastic Reading Measure — where it wins

    • Adjusts passage difficulty in response to student answers
    • Generates Lexile measures to guide text matching
    • Records results and reports progress through Literacy Pro

    Where it doesn't

    • Available as a component of Literacy Pro, not a standalone assessment
    • Requires sales contact for U.S. pricing
    • Web-based deployment only
  • MAP Growth Reading — where it wins

    • Adapts item difficulty to each student across grades K–12
    • Measures foundational skills, comprehension, and vocabulary
    • Offers English and Spanish forms with accessibility features

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting sales
    • Reading is included in a MAP Growth K–12 license, not sold separately
    • Listed support channels are documentation
  • Scholastic Reading Measure8.2/10 · Pricing on request

    A focused K–8 assessment that connects adaptive comprehension results to reading materials.

    Contact ScholasticFull verdict →
  • MAP Growth Reading7.4/10 · Pricing on request

    Adaptive reading measures, standards alignment, and growth reports for K–12 educators.

    Visit NWEAFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026

Last updated · How we research and update