Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Reading Comprehension Software

Read 180 vs Scholastic Reading Measure

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score Read 180 #1 in Reading Comprehension Software 9.0/10 Pricing on request ✓ 3 of 3 features Visit HMH

Read 180 leads on 1 check, Scholastic Reading Measure on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreRead 180 · 9.0/10
  • Most featuresRead 180 · 3 of 3

Read 180 scores higher on our rubric for reading comprehension software: 9.0 against 8.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #2.

On assessment type, Scholastic Reading Measure gives you Formative where Read 180 offers Diagnostic. Read 180 offers standards alignment; Scholastic Reading Measure doesn't publish it.

Read 180 is the better fit for comprehensive secondary reading intervention. Scholastic Reading Measure is the better fit for K–8 schools monitoring reading comprehension.

  • Read 180 fits best

    Comprehensive secondary reading intervention

  • Scholastic Reading Measure fits best

    K–8 schools monitoring reading comprehension

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Read 180 9.0/10 Visit ↗ Scholastic Reading Measure 8.2/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 8.2
Ranking #1 in Reading Comprehension Software #2 in Reading Comprehension Software
Best for Comprehensive secondary reading intervention K–8 schools monitoring reading comprehension
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Not published Not published
Free plan — Not published
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Integrations 1 integrations 5 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Read 180 3/3 · Scholastic Reading Measure 2/3
Adaptive difficulty ✓ ✓
Standards alignment ✓ (best) Not published
Class reporting ✓ ✓
Specs
Assessment type Diagnostic Formative
Passage formats Not published Not published
Grade range Grades 3–12 K–8
Our review
Pros
  • Adaptive paths span phonics, fluency, vocabulary, comprehension, and writing
  • Teacher-led lessons, independent texts, and digital practice work together
  • Diagnostic data, progress monitoring, and class reporting support placement
  • Adjusts passage difficulty in response to student answers
  • Generates Lexile measures to guide text matching
  • Records results and reports progress through Literacy Pro
Cons
  • Pricing requires contacting HMH rather than selecting a listed plan
  • Web and cloud deployment may not fit offline implementation needs
  • Its focus on Grades 3–12 excludes students outside that range
  • Available as a component of Literacy Pro, not a standalone assessment
  • Requires sales contact for U.S. pricing
  • Web-based deployment only
Our verdict

Read 180 is a reading intervention curriculum and student software program from Houghton Mifflin Harcourt for students in Grades 3–12 who are reading below grade level. It is designed for dedicated intervention or core classrooms, pairing…

Read the review →

For K–8 educators who need reading comprehension assessment tied to classroom reading, Scholastic Reading Measure offers computer-adaptive passages and questions. It adjusts passage difficulty according to student responses and generates…

Read the review →
  1. Read 180Reading Comprehension Software 9.0Pricing on request
  2. Scholastic Reading MeasureReading Comprehension Software 8.2Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Read 180 — where it wins

    • Adaptive paths span phonics, fluency, vocabulary, comprehension, and writing
    • Teacher-led lessons, independent texts, and digital practice work together
    • Diagnostic data, progress monitoring, and class reporting support placement

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting HMH rather than selecting a listed plan
    • Web and cloud deployment may not fit offline implementation needs
    • Its focus on Grades 3–12 excludes students outside that range
  • Scholastic Reading Measure — where it wins

    • Adjusts passage difficulty in response to student answers
    • Generates Lexile measures to guide text matching
    • Records results and reports progress through Literacy Pro

    Where it doesn't

    • Available as a component of Literacy Pro, not a standalone assessment
    • Requires sales contact for U.S. pricing
    • Web-based deployment only
  • Read 1809.0/10 · Pricing on request

    A broad, adaptive intervention program that connects instruction, practice, assessment, and reporting.

    Visit HMHFull verdict →
  • Scholastic Reading Measure8.2/10 · Pricing on request

    A focused K–8 assessment that connects adaptive comprehension results to reading materials.

    Contact ScholasticFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026

Last updated · How we research and update