Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Reading Comprehension Software

Scholastic Reading Measure vs CommonLit

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score Scholastic Reading Measure #2 in Reading Comprehension Software 8.2/10 Pricing on request ✓ 2 of 3 features Contact Scholastic
CommonLit #3 in Reading Comprehension Software 7.7/10 Free plan · paid from $4,000/yr Free plan✓ 0 of 3 features Visit CommonLit

Scholastic Reading Measure leads on 2 checks, CommonLit on 1, and 0 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreScholastic Reading Measure · 8.2/10
  • Free planonly CommonLit
  • Most featuresScholastic Reading Measure · 2 of 3

Scholastic Reading Measure scores higher on our rubric for reading comprehension software: 8.2 against 7.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #3.

CommonLit offers free plan; Scholastic Reading Measure doesn't publish it. Scholastic Reading Measure offers adaptive difficulty; CommonLit doesn't publish it. Scholastic Reading Measure offers class reporting; CommonLit doesn't publish it.

Scholastic Reading Measure is the better fit for K–8 schools monitoring reading comprehension. CommonLit is the better fit for schools wanting broad, affordable ELA resources.

  • Scholastic Reading Measure fits best

    K–8 schools monitoring reading comprehension

  • CommonLit fits best

    Schools wanting broad, affordable ELA resources

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Scholastic Reading Measure 8.2/10 Visit ↗ CommonLit 7.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.2 7.7
Ranking #2 in Reading Comprehension Software #3 in Reading Comprehension Software
Best for K–8 schools monitoring reading comprehension Schools wanting broad, affordable ELA resources
Pricing model Paid Free plan + paid
Starting price Not published Not published
Free plan Not published ✓ (best)
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Support Email, Phone, Docs Email, Live chat, Docs
Integrations 5 integrations 4 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Scholastic Reading Measure 2/3 · CommonLit 0/3
Adaptive difficulty ✓ (best) Not published
Standards alignment Not published Not published
Class reporting ✓ (best) Not published
Specs
Assessment type Formative Not published
Passage formats Not published Not published
Grade range K–8 Not published
Our review
Pros
  • Adjusts passage difficulty in response to student answers
  • Generates Lexile measures to guide text matching
  • Records results and reports progress through Literacy Pro
  • Thousands of literary and informational texts with grade-level listings
  • Guided checks, read-aloud audio, annotations, and translation tools
  • Paid dashboards, benchmarks, and Clever/ClassLink rostering
Cons
  • Available as a component of Literacy Pro, not a standalone assessment
  • Requires sales contact for U.S. pricing
  • Web-based deployment only
  • Web-only delivery offers no offline access
  • Foundational phonics is outside the stated curriculum focus
  • Assessment dashboards and implementation support require paid school plans
Our verdict

For K–8 educators who need reading comprehension assessment tied to classroom reading, Scholastic Reading Measure offers computer-adaptive passages and questions. It adjusts passage difficulty according to student responses and generates…

Read the review →

CommonLit is a browser-based literacy platform for educators and students. Its Text Library contains literary and informational works with grade-level listings for grades 3–12, while CommonLit 360 provides a full-year ELA curriculum for…

Read the review →
  1. Scholastic Reading MeasureReading Comprehension Software 8.2Pricing on request
  2. CommonLitReading Comprehension Software 7.7Free plan · paid from $4,000/yr

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Scholastic Reading Measure — where it wins

    • Adjusts passage difficulty in response to student answers
    • Generates Lexile measures to guide text matching
    • Records results and reports progress through Literacy Pro

    Where it doesn't

    • Available as a component of Literacy Pro, not a standalone assessment
    • Requires sales contact for U.S. pricing
    • Web-based deployment only
  • CommonLit — where it wins

    • Thousands of literary and informational texts with grade-level listings
    • Guided checks, read-aloud audio, annotations, and translation tools
    • Paid dashboards, benchmarks, and Clever/ClassLink rostering

    Where it doesn't

    • Web-only delivery offers no offline access
    • Foundational phonics is outside the stated curriculum focus
    • Assessment dashboards and implementation support require paid school plans
  • Scholastic Reading Measure8.2/10 · Pricing on request

    A focused K–8 assessment that connects adaptive comprehension results to reading materials.

    Contact ScholasticFull verdict →
  • CommonLit7.7/10 · Free plan · paid from $4,000/yr

    A broad web-based ELA library and curriculum with free access and paid school analytics.

    Visit CommonLitFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026

Last updated · How we research and update