Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Cyber Risk Quantification (CRQ) Tools

Risk Cloud Quantify vs Marsh Blue[i]

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Risk Cloud Quantify #1 in Cyber Risk Quantification (CRQ) Tools 9.1/10 Pricing on request ✓ 4 of 6 features Visit LogicGate
Marsh Blue[i] #3 in Cyber Risk Quantification (CRQ) Tools 7.8/10 Pricing on request ✓ 1 of 6 features Contact Marsh

Risk Cloud Quantify leads on 0 checks, Marsh Blue[i] on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreRisk Cloud Quantify · 9.1/10
  • Most featuresRisk Cloud Quantify · 4 of 6

Risk Cloud Quantify scores higher on our rubric for cyber risk quantification (crq) tools: 9.1 against 7.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #3.

Risk Cloud Quantify is the better fit for teams needing detailed FAIR-based cyber-loss modeling. Marsh Blue[i] is the better fit for teams linking cyber-loss estimates to insurance decisions.

  • Risk Cloud Quantify fits best

    Teams needing detailed FAIR-based cyber-loss modeling

  • Marsh Blue[i] fits best

    Teams linking cyber-loss estimates to insurance decisions

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Risk Cloud Quantify 9.1/10 Visit ↗ Marsh Blue[i] 7.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.1 7.8
Ranking #1 in Cyber Risk Quantification (CRQ) Tools #3 in Cyber Risk Quantification (CRQ) Tools
Best for Teams needing detailed FAIR-based cyber-loss modeling Teams linking cyber-loss estimates to insurance decisions
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request Pricing on request
Free plan — Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Built for Enterprise, Mid-market Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Risk Cloud Quantify 4/6 · Marsh Blue[i] 1/6
FAIR model support ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Monte Carlo simulation ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Scenario modeling ✓ ✓
Third-party risk Not checked yet Not checked yet
Framework mapping Not checked yet Not checked yet
API access ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment Cloud Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Open FAIR analysis with 50,000-run Monte Carlo simulations
  • Custom scenarios, loss curves and annual loss exceedance reports
  • REST API plus Jira, Slack and Microsoft 365 integrations
  • Quantifies potential cyber losses and analyzes risk scenarios.
  • Connects cyber-risk insights with insurance decisions.
  • Provides analytics-based cyber-risk reporting.
Cons
  • Available as an add-on to a broader Risk Cloud subscription
  • Pricing is customized rather than published as a fixed amount
  • Cloud deployment and no 24/7 support option
  • It is not positioned as a standalone security-monitoring product.
  • Pricing is handled through a sales contact.
  • The offering is aimed at mid-market and enterprise organizations.
Our verdict

Risk Cloud Quantify is LogicGate’s cyber-risk quantification capability for enterprise and mid-market governance, risk and compliance teams. It translates potential cyber incidents into monetary terms through the Open FAIR model,…

Read the review →

Marsh Blue[i] is a cyber-risk analytics offering for organizations that want a structured view of cyber exposure, particularly mid-market and enterprise teams weighing potential losses against insurance decisions. It supports quantitative…

Read the review →
  1. Risk Cloud QuantifyCyber Risk Quantification (CRQ) Tools 9.1Pricing on request
  2. Marsh Blue[i]Cyber Risk Quantification (CRQ) Tools 7.8Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Risk Cloud Quantify — where it wins

    • Open FAIR analysis with 50,000-run Monte Carlo simulations
    • Custom scenarios, loss curves and annual loss exceedance reports
    • REST API plus Jira, Slack and Microsoft 365 integrations

    Where it doesn't

    • Available as an add-on to a broader Risk Cloud subscription
    • Pricing is customized rather than published as a fixed amount
    • Cloud deployment and no 24/7 support option

  • Marsh Blue[i] — where it wins

    • Quantifies potential cyber losses and analyzes risk scenarios.
    • Connects cyber-risk insights with insurance decisions.
    • Provides analytics-based cyber-risk reporting.

    Where it doesn't

    • It is not positioned as a standalone security-monitoring product.
    • Pricing is handled through a sales contact.
    • The offering is aimed at mid-market and enterprise organizations.
  • Risk Cloud Quantify9.1/10 · Pricing on request

    A FAIR-based quantification add-on for modeling cyber losses in financial terms.

    Visit LogicGateFull verdict →
  • Marsh Blue[i]7.8/10 · Pricing on request

    A consulting-led analytics offering for estimating cyber losses and informing insurance decisions.

    Contact MarshFull verdict →

More comparisons

All cyber risk quantification (CRQ) tools comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update