Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Cyber Risk Quantification (CRQ) Tools

Marsh Blue[i] vs KPMG Cyber Risk Intelligence (CRI)

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Higher score Marsh Blue[i] #3 in Cyber Risk Quantification (CRQ) Tools 7.8/10 Pricing on request ✓ 1 of 6 features Contact Marsh
KPMG Cyber Risk Intelligence (CRI) #5 in Cyber Risk Quantification (CRQ) Tools 5.0/10 Pricing on request ✓ 0 of 6 features Visit KPMG CRI

Marsh Blue[i] leads on 0 checks, KPMG Cyber Risk Intelligence (CRI) on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreMarsh Blue[i] · 7.8/10
  • Most featuresMarsh Blue[i] · 1 of 6

Marsh Blue[i] scores higher on our rubric for cyber risk quantification (crq) tools: 7.8 against 5.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #5.

Marsh Blue[i] is the better fit for teams linking cyber-loss estimates to insurance decisions. KPMG Cyber Risk Intelligence (CRI) is the better fit for enterprise cyber-risk evaluation.

  • Marsh Blue[i] fits best

    Teams linking cyber-loss estimates to insurance decisions

  • KPMG Cyber Risk Intelligence (CRI) fits best

    Enterprise cyber-risk evaluation

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Marsh Blue[i] 7.8/10 Visit ↗ KPMG Cyber Risk Intelligence (CRI) 5.0/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.8 5.0
Ranking #3 in Cyber Risk Quantification (CRQ) Tools #5 in Cyber Risk Quantification (CRQ) Tools
Best for Teams linking cyber-loss estimates to insurance decisions Enterprise cyber-risk evaluation
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request Pricing on request
Free plan Not checked yet Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Enterprise
Features Marsh Blue[i] 1/6 · KPMG Cyber Risk Intelligence (CRI) 0/6
FAIR model support Not checked yet Not checked yet
Monte Carlo simulation Not checked yet Not checked yet
Scenario modeling ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Third-party risk Not checked yet Not checked yet
Framework mapping Not checked yet Not checked yet
API access Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Quantifies potential cyber losses and analyzes risk scenarios.
  • Connects cyber-risk insights with insurance decisions.
  • Provides analytics-based cyber-risk reporting.
  • Designed to support cybersecurity investment decisions
  • Addresses governance and cyber-risk communication
  • Offered by KPMG for enterprise organizations
Cons
  • It is not positioned as a standalone security-monitoring product.
  • Pricing is handled through a sales contact.
  • The offering is aimed at mid-market and enterprise organizations.
  • Contact-sales pricing adds a step to commercial evaluation
  • Enterprise positioning may not suit smaller organizations
  • Technical evaluation calls for direct diligence with KPMG
Our verdict

Marsh Blue[i] is a cyber-risk analytics offering for organizations that want a structured view of cyber exposure, particularly mid-market and enterprise teams weighing potential losses against insurance decisions. It supports quantitative…

Read the review →

KPMG Cyber Risk Intelligence (CRI) is software for evaluating and communicating cyber risk. It is positioned for organizations seeking quantified risk insights to inform cybersecurity investment, governance and decision-making. Its stated…

Read the review →
  1. Marsh Blue[i]Cyber Risk Quantification (CRQ) Tools 7.8Pricing on request
  2. KPMG Cyber Risk Intelligence (CRI)Cyber Risk Quantification (CRQ) Tools 5.0Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Marsh Blue[i] — where it wins

    • Quantifies potential cyber losses and analyzes risk scenarios.
    • Connects cyber-risk insights with insurance decisions.
    • Provides analytics-based cyber-risk reporting.

    Where it doesn't

    • It is not positioned as a standalone security-monitoring product.
    • Pricing is handled through a sales contact.
    • The offering is aimed at mid-market and enterprise organizations.

  • KPMG Cyber Risk Intelligence (CRI) — where it wins

    • Designed to support cybersecurity investment decisions
    • Addresses governance and cyber-risk communication
    • Offered by KPMG for enterprise organizations

    Where it doesn't

    • Contact-sales pricing adds a step to commercial evaluation
    • Enterprise positioning may not suit smaller organizations
    • Technical evaluation calls for direct diligence with KPMG
  • Marsh Blue[i]7.8/10 · Pricing on request

    A consulting-led analytics offering for estimating cyber losses and informing insurance decisions.

    Contact MarshFull verdict →
  • KPMG Cyber Risk Intelligence (CRI)5.0/10 · Pricing on request

    An enterprise-focused option for evaluating and communicating cyber risk.

    Visit KPMG CRIFull verdict →

More comparisons

All cyber risk quantification (CRQ) tools comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update