Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Cyber Risk Quantification (CRQ) Tools

FairCRQ vs Marsh Blue[i]

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score FairCRQ #2 in Cyber Risk Quantification (CRQ) Tools 8.5/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 4 of 6 features Visit FairCRQ
Marsh Blue[i] #3 in Cyber Risk Quantification (CRQ) Tools 7.8/10 Pricing on request ✓ 1 of 6 features Contact Marsh

FairCRQ leads on 0 checks, Marsh Blue[i] on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreFairCRQ · 8.5/10
  • Free planonly FairCRQ
  • Most featuresFairCRQ · 4 of 6

FairCRQ scores higher on our rubric for cyber risk quantification (crq) tools: 8.5 against 7.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #3.

FairCRQ is the better fit for organizations seeking free, board-ready risk estimates. Marsh Blue[i] is the better fit for teams linking cyber-loss estimates to insurance decisions.

  • FairCRQ fits best

    Organizations seeking free, board-ready risk estimates

  • Marsh Blue[i] fits best

    Teams linking cyber-loss estimates to insurance decisions

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature FairCRQ 8.5/10 Visit ↗ Marsh Blue[i] 7.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.5 7.8
Ranking #2 in Cyber Risk Quantification (CRQ) Tools #3 in Cyber Risk Quantification (CRQ) Tools
Best for Organizations seeking free, board-ready risk estimates Teams linking cyber-loss estimates to insurance decisions
Pricing model Free Paid
Starting price Free plan Pricing on request
Free plan ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features FairCRQ 4/6 · Marsh Blue[i] 1/6
FAIR model support ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Monte Carlo simulation ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Scenario modeling ✓ ✓
Third-party risk ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Framework mapping Not checked yet Not checked yet
API access Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment Cloud Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • OpenFAIR estimates include 10,000 Monte Carlo iterations per scenario
  • Shows annualised loss expectancy, percentiles and a loss exceedance curve
  • Produces scenario rankings and a board-ready risk summary
  • Quantifies potential cyber losses and analyzes risk scenarios.
  • Connects cyber-risk insights with insurance decisions.
  • Provides analytics-based cyber-risk reporting.
Cons
  • Estimates depend on organizational and security inputs, with calibration optional
  • Focused on cyber-loss quantification rather than broader risk management
  • No verified integrations or API access
  • It is not positioned as a standalone security-monitoring product.
  • Pricing is handled through a sales contact.
  • The offering is aimed at mid-market and enterprise organizations.
Our verdict

FairCRQ is a browser-based cyber risk quantification utility from Veptr.ai, intended for organizations that need to assess potential cyber losses and communicate them to decision-makers. It models scenarios such as ransomware, data…

Read the review →

Marsh Blue[i] is a cyber-risk analytics offering for organizations that want a structured view of cyber exposure, particularly mid-market and enterprise teams weighing potential losses against insurance decisions. It supports quantitative…

Read the review →
  1. FairCRQCyber Risk Quantification (CRQ) Tools 8.5Free plan
  2. Marsh Blue[i]Cyber Risk Quantification (CRQ) Tools 7.8Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • FairCRQ — where it wins

    • OpenFAIR estimates include 10,000 Monte Carlo iterations per scenario
    • Shows annualised loss expectancy, percentiles and a loss exceedance curve
    • Produces scenario rankings and a board-ready risk summary

    Where it doesn't

    • Estimates depend on organizational and security inputs, with calibration optional
    • Focused on cyber-loss quantification rather than broader risk management
    • No verified integrations or API access

  • Marsh Blue[i] — where it wins

    • Quantifies potential cyber losses and analyzes risk scenarios.
    • Connects cyber-risk insights with insurance decisions.
    • Provides analytics-based cyber-risk reporting.

    Where it doesn't

    • It is not positioned as a standalone security-monitoring product.
    • Pricing is handled through a sales contact.
    • The offering is aimed at mid-market and enterprise organizations.
  • FairCRQ8.5/10 · Free plan

    A free, browser-based tool for turning cyber scenarios into board-ready loss estimates.

    Visit FairCRQFull verdict →
  • Marsh Blue[i]7.8/10 · Pricing on request

    A consulting-led analytics offering for estimating cyber losses and informing insurance decisions.

    Contact MarshFull verdict →

More comparisons

All cyber risk quantification (CRQ) tools comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update