Head-to-head · Decompiler Software
Reko vs Recaf
Reko leads on 1 check, Recaf on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreReko · 8.4/10
- Free planboth
- Most featuresRecaf · 4 of 5
Reko scores higher on our rubric for decompiler software: 8.4 against 7.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #8.
Reko offers native-code decompilation; Recaf doesn't.
Reko is the better fit for free native decompilation across platforms. Recaf is the better fit for java and Android bytecode analysis.
- Reko fits best
Free native decompilation across platforms
- Recaf fits best
Java and Android bytecode analysis
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Reko 8.4/10 Visit ↗ | Recaf 7.9/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 8.4 | 7.9 |
| Ranking | #5 in Decompiler Software | #8 in Decompiler Software |
| Best for | Free native decompilation across platforms | Java and Android bytecode analysis |
| Pricing model | Free | Free |
| Starting price | Free plan | Free plan |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Desktop, Self-hosted | Desktop |
| Platforms | Windows, Linux, macOS | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Support | Community, Docs | Docs |
| Built for | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Reko 3/5 · Recaf 4/5 | ||
| Native-code decompilation | ✓ (best) | — |
| Bytecode decompilation | Not checked yet | ✓ (best) |
| Debugger integration | Not checked yet | ✓ (best) |
| Scripting API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Plugin support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| License type | Free | Free |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Reko is an open-source toolchain for decompiling machine-code binary executables into higher-level output. It is aimed at reverse engineers, developers, and analysts who understand machine code or assembly language and need more than a… Read the review → |
Recaf is an open-source desktop tool for analyzing and editing compiled Java and Android applications. It is aimed at reverse engineering, malware analysis, Java modding, and other workflows involving JVM or Android bytecode. The product… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Reko — where it wins
- Free and open source with no commercial plan structure
- GUI, command-line, .NET API, and runtime library workflows
- Supports multiple architectures, formats, scripts, and plugins
Where it doesn't
- Intended for users familiar with machine code or assembly
- Debugger integration is not a stated strength
- Focused on machine-code executables rather than bytecode
Recaf — where it wins
- Edits bytecode and assembler, then recompiles changed classes
- Combines decompilation, search, obfuscation analysis, and live patching
- Free open-source desktop tool with Windows, macOS, Linux, and CLI support
Where it doesn't
- Does not target native-code decompilation
- Publishing currently centers on CI snapshots rather than regular independent releases
- Its verified integration breadth is limited
- Reko8.4/10 · Free plan
A free, extensible decompiler with GUI, CLI, API, scripting, and multi-architecture support.
Visit RekoFull verdict → - Recaf7.9/10 · Free plan
A capable free toolkit for inspecting, editing, and instrumenting Java and Android bytecode.
Visit RecafFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Ghidra vs Reko
- Ghidra vs Recaf
- Binary Ninja vs Reko
- Binary Ninja vs Recaf
- IDA Pro vs Reko
- IDA Pro vs Recaf
- JEB vs Reko
- JEB vs Recaf
All decompiler software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update



