Head-to-head · Decompiler Software
Ghidra vs Recaf
Ghidra leads on 1 check, Recaf on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreGhidra · 9.4/10
- Free planboth
- Most featuresGhidra · 5 of 5
Ghidra scores higher on our rubric for decompiler software: 9.4 against 7.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #8.
Ghidra offers native-code decompilation; Recaf doesn't.
Ghidra is the better fit for free, broad native and bytecode analysis. Recaf is the better fit for java and Android bytecode analysis.
- Ghidra fits best
Free, broad native and bytecode analysis
- Recaf fits best
Java and Android bytecode analysis
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Ghidra 9.4/10 Visit ↗ | Recaf 7.9/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.4 | 7.9 |
| Ranking | #1 in Decompiler Software | #8 in Decompiler Software |
| Best for | Free, broad native and bytecode analysis | Java and Android bytecode analysis |
| Pricing model | Free | Free |
| Starting price | Free plan | Free plan |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Platforms | Windows, Linux, macOS | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Support | Docs, Community | Docs |
| Built for | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Ghidra 5/5 · Recaf 4/5 | ||
| Native-code decompilation | ✓ (best) | — |
| Bytecode decompilation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Debugger integration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Scripting API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Plugin support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| License type | Free | Free |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Ghidra is an open-source software reverse-engineering framework created and maintained by the National Security Agency Research Directorate. It is designed for analysts, security researchers, and developers examining compiled programs… Read the review → |
Recaf is an open-source desktop tool for analyzing and editing compiled Java and Android applications. It is aimed at reverse engineering, malware analysis, Java modding, and other workflows involving JVM or Android bytecode. The product… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Ghidra — where it wins
- Free open-source framework for native-code disassembly and decompilation
- Supports Java and DEX bytecode analysis alongside native architectures
- Includes debugging, scripting, headless analysis, and plugin support
Where it doesn't
- Its broad feature set may require a technical reverse-engineering workflow
- Plugin and scripting extensions add configuration choices to the environment
- Focused on compiled-program analysis rather than general software development
Recaf — where it wins
- Edits bytecode and assembler, then recompiles changed classes
- Combines decompilation, search, obfuscation analysis, and live patching
- Free open-source desktop tool with Windows, macOS, Linux, and CLI support
Where it doesn't
- Does not target native-code decompilation
- Publishing currently centers on CI snapshots rather than regular independent releases
- Its verified integration breadth is limited
- Ghidra9.4/10 · Free plan
A free, broad toolkit for native-code, Java, and DEX analysis.
Visit GhidraFull verdict → - Recaf7.9/10 · Free plan
A capable free toolkit for inspecting, editing, and instrumenting Java and Android bytecode.
Visit RecafFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Ghidra vs Binary Ninja
- Ghidra vs IDA Pro
- Ghidra vs JEB
- Ghidra vs Reko
- Ghidra vs rev.ng
- Ghidra vs RetDec
- Binary Ninja vs Recaf
- IDA Pro vs Recaf
All decompiler software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update




