Head-to-head · Retrospective Software
Reetro vs FocusRetro
Reetro leads on 0 checks, FocusRetro on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreReetro · 8.2/10
- Free planboth
Reetro scores higher on our rubric for retrospective software: 8.2 against 7.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #8.
Reetro is the better fit for teams needing async retros and scheduling. FocusRetro is the better fit for teams needing facilitation and async participation.
- Reetro fits best
Teams needing async retros and scheduling
- FocusRetro fits best
Teams needing facilitation and async participation
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Reetro 8.2/10 Visit ↗ | FocusRetro 7.2/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Ranking | #3 in Retrospective Software | #8 in Retrospective Software |
| Best for | Teams needing async retros and scheduling | Teams needing facilitation and async participation |
| Pricing model | Free plan + paid | Free plan + paid |
| Starting price | Not published | Not published |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Support | Email, Phone, Docs | |
| Compliance | SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, SSO/SAML, 2FA | GDPR, SSO/SAML |
| Integrations | 4 integrations | 2 integrations |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Reetro 5/5 · FocusRetro 5/5 | ||
| Retro templates | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anonymous feedback | ✓ | ✓ |
| Voting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Action tracking | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrations | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Participant limit | 60 participants | Not published |
| Delivery modes | Both | Both |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Reetro is a web-based retrospective tool for scrum masters, agile teams, and organizations that need structured feedback and follow-through. It supports standard, phased, and whiteboard boards, reusable templates, anonymous feedback,… Read the review → |
FocusRetro is an online retrospective workspace for agile, remote, and hybrid teams. It supports sprint retrospectives, incident post-mortems, health checks, workshops, and project debriefs through reusable templates, private writing,… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Reetro — where it wins
- Supports live, phased, whiteboard, and asynchronous retrospectives
- Tracks assignees, statuses, due dates, and priorities
- Connects with Jira, Azure DevOps, Confluence, and Trello
Where it doesn't
- Free plan limits teams, members, boards, and health checks
- Pro includes only limited AI features and support
- Available on the web rather than across multiple platforms
FocusRetro — where it wins
- Private writing, anonymous cards, blind voting, and moderation support candid input
- Action items include owners, due dates, and status for follow-through
- Live and async workflows with timers, guest links, Jira, and Slack integrations
Where it doesn't
- Web-only access limits platform choice for teams wanting native desktop or mobile apps
- Business adds admin controls and workspaces, but its price is not stated here
- No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certification for teams requiring those attestations
- Reetro8.2/10 · Free plan · paid from $10/mo
A flexible retrospective workspace with async workflows, scheduling, and team-based pricing.
Visit ReetroFull verdict → - FocusRetro7.2/10 · Free plan · paid from $12/mo (annual) · 14-day trial
A focused retro workspace with strong facilitation and async participation tools.
Visit FocusRetroFull verdict →
More comparisons
- FreeRetrospectives vs Reetro
- FreeRetrospectives vs FocusRetro
- QRetro vs Reetro
- QRetro vs FocusRetro
- Reetro vs SprintsPlans
- Reetro vs GoRetro
- Reetro vs EasyRetro
- Reetro vs Neatro
All retrospective software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026
Last updated · How we research and update






