Head-to-head · Retrospective Software
QRetro vs FocusRetro
QRetro leads on 0 checks, FocusRetro on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreQRetro · 8.2/10
- Free planboth
QRetro scores higher on our rubric for retrospective software: 8.2 against 7.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #8.
On delivery modes, FocusRetro gives you Both where QRetro offers Live.
QRetro is the better fit for free teams needing structured retro workflows. FocusRetro is the better fit for teams needing facilitation and async participation.
- QRetro fits best
Free teams needing structured retro workflows
- FocusRetro fits best
Teams needing facilitation and async participation
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | QRetro 8.2/10 Visit ↗ | FocusRetro 7.2/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Ranking | #2 in Retrospective Software | #8 in Retrospective Software |
| Best for | Free teams needing structured retro workflows | Teams needing facilitation and async participation |
| Pricing model | Free | Free plan + paid |
| Starting price | Not published | Not published |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Support | Email, Docs | |
| Integrations | 5 integrations | 2 integrations |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features QRetro 5/5 · FocusRetro 5/5 | ||
| Retro templates | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anonymous feedback | ✓ | ✓ |
| Voting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Action tracking | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrations | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Participant limit | Not published | Not published |
| Delivery modes | Live | Both |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | QRetro is a browser-based retrospective and team-collaboration tool for agile and software teams. It suits teams that want a repeatable process for collecting feedback, grouping similar cards, discussing themes, voting, summarizing… Read the review → |
FocusRetro is an online retrospective workspace for agile, remote, and hybrid teams. It supports sprint retrospectives, incident post-mortems, health checks, workshops, and project debriefs through reusable templates, private writing,… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
QRetro — where it wins
- 100+ reusable templates and a guided seven-stage workflow
- Private feedback, grouping, configurable voting, and automatic summaries
- Action tracking, health checks, Planning Poker, and Jira/Linear integrations
Where it doesn't
- Designed for live retrospectives rather than asynchronous delivery
- MCP data access depends on compatible clients such as Claude, Cursor, or VS Code
- Seven workflow stages may feel restrictive for open-ended retrospectives
FocusRetro — where it wins
- Private writing, anonymous cards, blind voting, and moderation support candid input
- Action items include owners, due dates, and status for follow-through
- Live and async workflows with timers, guest links, Jira, and Slack integrations
Where it doesn't
- Web-only access limits platform choice for teams wanting native desktop or mobile apps
- Business adds admin controls and workspaces, but its price is not stated here
- No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certification for teams requiring those attestations
- QRetro8.2/10 · Free plan
A free, structured retro workspace with strong workflow coverage and practical integrations.
Visit QRetroFull verdict → - FocusRetro7.2/10 · Free plan · paid from $12/mo (annual) · 14-day trial
A focused retro workspace with strong facilitation and async participation tools.
Visit FocusRetroFull verdict →
More comparisons
- FreeRetrospectives vs QRetro
- FreeRetrospectives vs FocusRetro
- QRetro vs Reetro
- QRetro vs SprintsPlans
- QRetro vs GoRetro
- QRetro vs EasyRetro
- QRetro vs Neatro
- Reetro vs FocusRetro
All retrospective software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026
Last updated · How we research and update






